Obtaining new resolutions in carnivore tooth pit morphological analyses: A methodological update for digital taphonomy

Modern day investigation in fields of archaeology and palaeontology can be greatly characterised by an exponential growth of integrated new technologies, nevertheless, while these advances are of great significance to multiple lines of research, their evaluation and update over time is equally as important. Here we present an application of inter and intra-observer analysis in taphonomy based geometric morphometrics, employing robust non-parametric statistical analyses for the study of experimental carnivore tooth pit morphologies. To fully understand the influence of measurement errors in the collection of this data, our statistical assessment was performed on fully superimposed, partially superimposed and raw landmark coordinates collected from 3D surface scanning. Experimental samples used to assess these errors includes wolf and dog tooth pits used in modern day ecological livestock predation analysis. Results obtained from this study highlight the importance of landmark type in the assessment of error, emphasising the value of semi-landmark models over the use of ambiguous Type III landmarks. In addition to this, data also reveals the importance of observer experience for the collection of data alongside an interesting increase in error when working with fully superimposed landmarks due to the “Pinocchio Effect”. Through this study we are able to redefine the geometric morphometric models used for tooth pit morphological analyses. This final hybrid Type II fixed landmark and semi-landmark model presents a significant reduction in human induced error, generating a more metrically reliable and replicable method that can be used for data pooling in future inter-institutional research. These results can be considered a fundamental step forward for carnivore inspired studies, having an impact on archaeological, palaeontological, modern-day ecological research as well as applications in other forensic sciences.

[1]  J. Mitani,et al.  Taphonomic aspects of crowned hawk-eagle predation on monkeys. , 2003, Journal of human evolution.

[2]  R. Blumenschine,et al.  Komodo monitor (Varanus komodoensis) feeding behavior and dental function reflected through tooth marks on bone surfaces, and the application to ziphodont paleobiology , 2009, Paleobiology.

[3]  A. Rosas,et al.  Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Multimodal learning with deep Boltzmann machines , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[5]  Rajat Raina,et al.  Constructing informative priors using transfer learning , 2006, ICML.

[6]  E. Carbonell,et al.  Range of bone modifications by human chewing , 2013 .

[7]  Blaise Agüera y Arcas,et al.  Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data , 2016, AISTATS.

[8]  D Lombao,et al.  Teaching to make stone tools: new experimental evidence supporting a technological hypothesis for the origins of language , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Mean Shift: A Robust Approach Toward Feature Space Analysis , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Pablo Rodríguez-Gonzálvez,et al.  Automatic tree parameter extraction by a Mobile LiDAR System in an urban context , 2018, PloS one.

[11]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Monitoring the health of an emblematic monument from terrestrial laser scanner , 2008 .

[12]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Finding a "Kneedle" in a Haystack: Detecting Knee Points in System Behavior , 2011, 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.

[13]  V. Kalm,et al.  GIS‐based reconstruction of Late Weichselian proglacial lakes in northwestern Russia and Belarus , 2017 .

[14]  F. d’Errico,et al.  Criteria for identifying bone modification by termites in the fossil record , 2012 .

[15]  P. Currie,et al.  Cannibalism in Tyrannosaurus rex , 2010, PloS one.

[16]  Michael Höhle,et al.  Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods , 2009 .

[17]  Fabio Crosilla,et al.  Use of generalised Procrustes analysis for the photogrammetric block adjustment by independent models , 2002 .

[18]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  3D analysis of cut marks using a new geometric morphometric methodological approach , 2019, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[19]  E. Carbonell,et al.  Taphonomic modifications produced by modern brown bears (Ursus arctos) , 2013 .

[20]  Pablo Rodríguez-Gonzálvez,et al.  Validation of Portable Mobile Mapping System for Inspection Tasks in Thermal and Fluid-Mechanical Facilities , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[21]  J. Yravedra,et al.  A cautionary note on the use of captive carnivores to model wild predator behavior: a comparison of bone modification patterns on long bones by captive and wild lions , 2013 .

[22]  F. Rohlf,et al.  A revolution morphometrics. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Mark B. Roberts,et al.  The Mental Template in Handaxe Manufacture: New Insights into Acheulean Lithic Technological Behavior at Boxgrove, Sussex, UK , 2019 .

[24]  J. Yravedra,et al.  A study of dimensional differences of tooth marks (pits and scores) on bones modified by small and large carnivores , 2012, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[25]  Stephen J. Lycett,et al.  A crossbeam co-ordinate caliper for the morphometric analysis of lithic nuclei: a description, test and empirical examples of application , 2006 .

[26]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[27]  P. O'higgins,et al.  A geometric morphometric study of regional differences in the ontogeny of the modern human facial skeleton † , 2002, Journal of anatomy.

[28]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Discerning carnivore agency through the three-dimensional study of tooth pits: Revisiting crocodile feeding behaviour at FLK- Zinj and FLK NN3 (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania) , 2017 .

[29]  Marta Mirazón Lahr,et al.  The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications. , 2007, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  Phillip L. Walker,et al.  Comparison of coordinate measurement precision of different landmark types on human crania using a 3D laser scanner and a 3D digitiser: Implications for applications of digital morphometrics , 2011 .

[31]  Chris Robinson,et al.  Error in geometric morphometric data collection: Combining data from multiple sources. , 2017, American journal of physical anthropology.

[32]  Eric Delson,et al.  Evaluating causes of error in landmark-based data collection using scanners , 2017, PloS one.

[33]  M. Grassberger,et al.  Experimental sharp force injuries to ribs: Multimodal morphological and geometric morphometric analyses using micro-CT, macro photography and SEM. , 2018, Forensic science international.

[34]  Pietro Perona,et al.  One-shot learning of object categories , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[35]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Differentiating percussion pits and carnivore tooth pits using 3D reconstructions and geometric morphometrics , 2018, PloS one.

[36]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[37]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  Measurement error in geometric morphometrics : Empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape , 1998 .

[38]  D. González-Aguilera,et al.  Combining machine learning algorithms and geometric morphometrics: A study of carnivore tooth marks , 2019, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology.

[39]  G. Haynes.  A guide for differentiating mammalian carnivore taxa responsible for gnaw damage to herbivore limb bones , 1983, Paleobiology.

[40]  R. Blumenschine,et al.  A diagnosis of crocodile feeding traces on larger mammal bone, with fossil examples from the Plio-Pleistocene Olduvai Basin, Tanzania. , 2006, Journal of human evolution.

[41]  T. Tanimori,et al.  First On-Site True Gamma-Ray Imaging-Spectroscopy of Contamination near Fukushima Plant , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[42]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[43]  J. Kieser,et al.  Analysis of experimental cranial skin wounding from screwdriver trauma , 2008, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[44]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Distributed deep learning networks among institutions for medical imaging , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[45]  Harold D. Delaney,et al.  The Kruskal-Wallis Test and Stochastic Homogeneity , 1998 .

[46]  I. Király,et al.  Learning how to use a tool: Mutually exclusive tool-function mappings are selectively acquired from linguistic in-group models. , 2018, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[47]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Micro-photogrammetric characterization of cut marks on bones , 2015 .

[48]  Gerhard W Weber,et al.  Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania. , 2009, Journal of human evolution.

[49]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Confronting Passive and Active Sensors with Non-Gaussian Statistics , 2014, Sensors.

[50]  Lloyd A. Courtenay,et al.  Who ate OH80 (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania)? A geometric-morphometric analysis of surface bone modifications of a Paranthropus boisei skeleton , 2019, Quaternary International.

[51]  J. M. Lynch,et al.  Quantifying temporal bone morphology of great apes and humans: an approach using geometric morphometrics , 2002, Journal of anatomy.

[52]  G. Erickson,et al.  Bite marks attributable to Tyrannosaurus rex: Preliminary description and implications , 1996 .

[53]  C. Dickman,et al.  MEASUREMENT ERROR ASSOCIATED WITH EXTERNAL MEASUREMENTS COMMONLY USED IN SMALL-MAMMAL STUDIES , 2006 .

[54]  T. Hanihara,et al.  Intra-and Interobserver Errors in Facial Flatness Measurements , 1999 .

[55]  F. Muñoz-Muñoz,et al.  Measurement Error in Morphometric Studies: Comparison between Manual and Computerized Methods , 2010 .

[56]  P. O’Higgins.  The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry , 2000, Journal of anatomy.

[57]  Ashirbani Saha,et al.  Deep learning for segmentation of brain tumors: Impact of cross‐institutional training and testing , 2018, Medical physics.

[58]  Larry D. Hostetler,et al.  The estimation of the gradient of a density function, with applications in pattern recognition , 1975, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[59]  G. Haynes.  Evidence of carnivore gnawing on Pleistocene and Recent mammalian bones , 1980, Paleobiology.

[60]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Semilandmarks in Three Dimensions , 2005 .

[61]  R. Blumenschine.  Percussion marks, tooth marks, and experimental determinations of the timing of hominid and carnivore access to long bones at FLK Zinjanthropus, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania , 1995 .

[62]  D. Krause,et al.  Cannibalism in the Madagascan dinosaur Majungatholus atopus , 2003, Nature.

[63]  P. Andrews,et al.  When humans chew bones. , 2011, Journal of human evolution.

[64]  G. Haynes,et al.  Osteophagia and bone modifications by giraffe and other large ungulates , 2013 .

[65]  C. Haynes,et al.  Camels as Taphonomic Agents , 1985, Quaternary Research.

[66]  M. Schmittbuhl,et al.  New approaches in hominoid taxonomy: morphometrics. , 2003, American journal of physical anthropology.

[67]  C. Villemant,et al.  Combining geometric morphometrics with pattern recognition for the investigation of species complexes , 2003 .

[68]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[69]  P. Pilesjö,et al.  The use of LIDAR as a data source for digital elevation models : a study of the relationship between the accuracy of digital elevation models and topographical attributes in northern peatlands , 2011 .

[70]  T. Ivanovska,et al.  Procrustes-based geometric morphometrics on MRI images: An example of inter-operator bias in 3D landmarks and its impact on big datasets , 2018, PloS one.

[71]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[72]  Doug M. Boyer,et al.  A collection of non-human primate computed tomography scans housed in MorphoSource, a repository for 3D data , 2016, Scientific Data.

[73]  Jordan M. Malof,et al.  Distributed solar photovoltaic array location and extent dataset for remote sensing object identification , 2016, Scientific Data.

[74]  J. Hodgson,et al.  Pits and pitfalls: taxonomic variability and patterning in tooth mark dimensions , 2009 .

[75]  S. Lele,et al.  Landmark Morphometrics and the Analysis of Variation , 2005 .

[76]  M. Domínguez‐Rodrigo,et al.  The use of tooth pits to identify carnivore taxa in tooth-marked archaeofaunas and their relevance to reconstruct hominid carcass processing behaviours , 2003 .

[77]  P. Saladié,et al.  The Middle Pleistocene site of Torralba (Soria, Spain): a taphonomic view of the Marquis of Cerralbo and Howell faunal collections , 2018, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[78]  M. Domínguez‐Rodrigo,et al.  A taphonomic study of bone modification and of tooth-mark patterns on long limb bone portions by suids , 2009 .

[79]  C J Valeri,et al.  Capturing data from three-dimensional surfaces using fuzzy landmarks. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.

[80]  R E Ward,et al.  Brief communication: measurement size, precision, and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: bigger is better. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[81]  Y. Fernández-Jalvo,et al.  Was it the deer or the fox , 2011 .

[82]  E. Carbonell,et al.  Human predatory behavior and the social implications of communal hunting based on evidence from the TD10.2 bison bone bed at Gran Dolina (Atapuerca, Spain). , 2017, Journal of human evolution.

[83]  Tanya M. Smith,et al.  Australopithecus afarensis endocasts suggest ape-like brain organization and prolonged brain growth , 2020, Science Advances.

[84]  P. O'higgins,et al.  Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three‐dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation , 1998, Journal of anatomy.

[85]  R. Singer.  The “Bone Tools” from Hopefield , 1956 .

[86]  M. Singleton.  Patterns of cranial shape variation in the Papionini (Primates: Cercopithecinae). , 2002, Journal of human evolution.

[87]  Diego González-Aguilera,et al.  Statistical Comparison between Low-Cost Methods for 3D Characterization of Cut-Marks on Bones , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[88]  S. Lougheed,et al.  Measurement Error and Morphometric Studies: Statistical Power and Observer Experience , 1992 .

[89]  Justin W. Adams,et al.  Surface Model and Tomographic Archive of Fossil Primate and Other Mammal Holotype and Paratype Specimens of the Ditsong National Museum of Natural History, Pretoria, South Africa , 2015, PloS one.

[90]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Classification using discriminative restricted Boltzmann machines , 2008, ICML '08.