Effects of syntactic expectations on speech segmentation.

Although the effect of acoustic cues on speech segmentation has been extensively investigated, the role of higher order information (e.g., syntax) has received less attention. Here, the authors examined whether syntactic expectations based on subject-verb agreement have an effect on segmentation and whether they do so despite conflicting acoustic cues. Although participants detected target words faster in phrases containing adequate acoustic cues ("spins" in take spins and "pins" in takes pins), this acoustic effect was suppressed when the phrases were appended to a plural context (those women take spins/*takes pins [with the asterisk indicating a syntactically unacceptable parse]). The syntactically congruent target ("spins") was detected faster regardless of the acoustics. However, a singular context (that woman *take spins/takes pins) had no effect on segmentation, and the results resembled those of the neutral phrases. Subsequent experiments showed that the discrepancy was due to the relative time course of syntactic expectations and acoustics cues. Taken together, the data suggest that syntactic knowledge can facilitate segmentation but that its effect is substantially attenuated if conflicting acoustic cues are encountered before full realization of the syntactic constraint.

[1]  L. Nakatani,et al.  Hearing "words" without words: prosodic cues for word perception. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  P. Boersma.  Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.24) , 2006 .

[3]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[4]  P. Trudgill,et al.  English Accents and Dialects : An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles , 1996 .

[5]  Hugo Queué.  Durational cues for word segmentation Dutch , 1992 .

[6]  P C Gordon,et al.  Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: evidence from priming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  L. Nakatani,et al.  Locus of segmental cues for word juncture. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  An ERP study of continuous speech processing. II. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in non-native speakers. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  Sven L Mattys,et al.  Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Sven L Mattys,et al.  Stress versus coarticulation: toward an integrated approach to explicit speech segmentation. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics , 2001 .

[12]  A. Christophe,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the online syntactic analysis of spoken sentences. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  J. McQueen.  Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics , 1998 .

[14]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition , 1994, ICSLP.

[15]  Laurence White,et al.  English speech timing : a domain and locus approach , 2002 .

[16]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[17]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Word Identification in Fluent Speech , 1995 .

[18]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  L. Tyler,et al.  Quantifying contextual contributions to word-recognition processes , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  D. K. Oller,et al.  The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  S Borsky,et al.  The Temporal Unfolding of Local Acoustic Information and Sentence Context , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[23]  L. Tyler,et al.  Local and Global Structure in Spoken Language Comprehension , 1987 .

[24]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception. , 1997 .

[25]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Leading Up the Lexical Garden Path: Segmentation and Ambiguity in Spoken Word Recognition , 2002 .

[26]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[27]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[28]  Shari R. Baum,et al.  On-line sensitivity to local and long-distance syntactic dependencies in Broca's aphasia , 1989, Brain and Language.

[29]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[30]  M. MacDonald.  The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity , 1993 .

[31]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Sharron E. Whitecross,et al.  Detecting Silent Pauses in Speech , 2005, Psychological science.

[33]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Comparing correlated correlation coefficients , 1992 .

[34]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  Lexical, syntactic, and stress-pattern cues for speech segmentation. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[35]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[37]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure , 1996 .

[39]  M. Kutas,et al.  Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[40]  D. Norris,et al.  The Possible-Word Constraint in the Segmentation of Continuous Speech , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  D. Rubin,et al.  Comparing Correlated but Nonoverlapping Correlations , 1996 .

[42]  A. Cutler,et al.  Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception , 1992 .

[43]  D. Norris.  Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[44]  P. Ladefoged.  A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[45]  Laurence White,et al.  Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The Effects of Context on the Recognition of Polymorphemic Words , 1986 .

[47]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[48]  H. Kolk,et al.  On-line Sensitivity to Subject-Verb Agreement Violations in Broca′s Aphasics: The Role of Syntactic Complexity and Time , 1994, Brain and Language.

[49]  S. Baum.  Sensitivity to Syntactic Violations Across the Age-Span: Evidence from a Word-Monitoring Task , 1991 .

[50]  H Quené,et al.  Segment durations and accent as cues to word segmentation in Dutch. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.