Professionalism for medicine: opportunities and obligations

Physicians' dual roles — as healer and professional — are linked by codes of ethics governing behaviour and are empowered by science. Being part of a profession entails a societal contract. The profession is granted a monopoly over the use of a body of knowledge and the privilege of self‐regulation and, in return, guarantees society professional competence, integrity and the provision of altruistic service. Societal attitudes to professionalism have changed from supportive to increasingly critical — with physicians being criticised for pursuing their own financial interests, and failing to self‐regulate in a way that guarantees competence. Professional values are also threatened by many other factors. The most important are the changes in healthcare delivery in the developed world, with control shifting from the profession to the State and/or the corporate sector. For the ideal of professionalism to survive, physicians must understand it and its role in the social contract. They must meet the obligations necessary to sustain professionalism and ensure that healthcare systems support, rather than subvert, behaviour that is compatible with professionalism's values.

[1]  C. Ham,et al.  The medical profession, the public, and the government , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Nigel Edwards,et al.  Unhappy doctors: what are the causes and what can be done? , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Medical Professionalism.  Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians' charter , 2002, The Lancet.

[4]  R. Stevens,et al.  Public roles for the medical profession in the United States: beyond theories of decline and fall. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[5]  Eliot Freidson,et al.  Professionalism: The Third Logic , 2001 .

[6]  K. Davis,et al.  Physicians' views on quality of care: a five-country comparison. , 2001, Health affairs.

[7]  R. Cruess,et al.  Professionalism: an ideal to be sustained , 2000, The Lancet.

[8]  H. Swick.  Toward a Normative Definition of Medical Professionalism , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  A. J. Dunning.  Status of the doctor—present and future , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  M. Wynia,et al.  Medical professionalism in society. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  L. Casalino.  The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  E. Pellegrino,et al.  Professional medical associations: ethical and practical guidelines. , 1999, JAMA.

[13]  R. Cruess,et al.  Renewing professionalism: an opportunity for medicine. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[14]  D. Irvine.  The performance of doctors: the new professionalism , 1999, The Lancet.

[15]  R. Cruess,et al.  Teaching medicine as a profession in the service of healing , 1997, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  D. Berwick,et al.  Medical associations: guilds or leaders? , 1997, BMJ.

[17]  George Ross Fisher,et al.  Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present , 1996 .

[18]  D. Mechanic,et al.  Changing medical organization and the erosion of trust. , 1996, The Milbank quarterly.

[19]  L. Emanuel,et al.  What Is Accountability in Health Care? , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  Daniel M Fox,et al.  The changing medical profession: an international perspective , 1995, Medical History.

[21]  J P Bunker,et al.  Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy , 1994 .

[22]  H. Perkin,et al.  The rise of professional society: England since 1880 , 1990 .

[23]  J. Mckinlay,et al.  Towards the Proletarianization of Physicians , 1985, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[24]  G. Ritzer,et al.  Professionals as Workers: Mental Labor in Advanced Capitalism. , 1983 .

[25]  J. Kett,et al.  The Social Transformation of American Medicine , 1983 .

[26]  Msmw.  The social transformation of american medicine. , 1983, The Western journal of medicine.

[27]  T. Johnson.  Professions and Power , 1972 .

[28]  Marie R. Haug,et al.  Deprofessionalization: An Alternate Hypothesis for the Future , 1972 .

[29]  M. Roemer.  Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care , 1972 .

[30]  Eliot Freidson,et al.  Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care , 1971 .

[31]  E. Freidson.  Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge , 1970 .

[32]  Mcculloch.  Social work as a profession , 1943 .

[33]  T. Parsons.  The Professions and Social Structure , 1939 .

[34]  E. M. Shanahan.  THE MEDICAL PROFESSION IN AUSTRALIA , 1924 .

[35]  R. Tawney,et al.  The Acquisitive Society , 1922 .

[36]  David W Chambers,et al.  The professions. , 2004, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[37]  J. Allsop.  Regulation and the Medical Profession , 2002 .

[38]  William R. Hendee,et al.  To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System , 2001 .

[39]  J. Corrigan,et al.  To Err Is Human Building a Safer Health System , 2000 .

[40]  Carrie Menkel‐Meadow.  Ethics and Professionalism , 1999 .

[41]  Thomas L. Friedman,et al.  The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization , 1999 .

[42]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  The end of professionalism? , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[43]  I. Svab,et al.  States, regulation and the medical profession , 1996 .

[44]  E. Ackermann.  The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. , 1996, The Medical journal of Australia.

[45]  William M. Sullivan,et al.  Work and integrity : the crisis and promise of professionalism in America , 1995 .

[46]  P. Sohl,et al.  Codes of medical ethics: traditional foundations and contemporary practice. , 1986, Social science & medicine.

[47]  M. Larson.  The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis , 1977 .