A MRI-CT prostate registration using sparse representation technique

Purpose: To develop a new MRI-CT prostate registration using patch-based deformation prediction framework to improve MRI-guided prostate radiotherapy by incorporating multiparametric MRI into planning CT images. Methods: The main contribution is to estimate the deformation between prostate MRI and CT images in a patch-wise fashion by using the sparse representation technique. We assume that two image patches should follow the same deformation if their patch-wise appearance patterns are similar. Specifically, there are two stages in our proposed framework, i.e., the training stage and the application stage. In the training stage, each prostate MR images are carefully registered to the corresponding CT images and all training MR and CT images are carefully registered to a selected CT template. Thus, we obtain the dense deformation field for each training MR and CT image. In the application stage, for registering a new subject MR image with the same subject CT image, we first select a small number of key points at the distinctive regions of this subject CT image. Then, for each key point in the subject CT image, we extract the image patch, centered at the underlying key point. Then, we adaptively construct the coupled dictionary for the underlying point where each atom in the dictionary consists of image patches and the respective deformations obtained from training pair-wise MRI-CT images. Next, the subject image patch can be sparsely represented by a linear combination of training image patches in the dictionary, where we apply the same sparse coefficients to the respective deformations in the dictionary to predict the deformation for the subject MR image patch. After we repeat the same procedure for each subject CT key point, we use B-splines to interpolate a dense deformation field, which is used as the initialization to allow the registration algorithm estimating the remaining small segment of deformations from MRI to CT image. Results: Our MRI-CT registration technique was validated with a clinical study of 10 patients. The accuracy of our approach was assessed using some identified landmarks in both MRI and CT images. Our proposed registration was compared with the current free-form-deformation (FFD)-based registration method. The accuracy of the proposed method was significantly higher than the commonly used FFD-based registration utilizing normalized mutual information (NMI). Conclusions: We have developed a new prostate MR-CT registration approach based on patch-deformation dictionary, demonstrated its clinical feasibility, and validated its accuracy with some identified landmarks. The proposed registration method may provide an accurate and robust means of estimating prostate-gland deformation between MRI and CT scans, and is therefore well-suited for a number of MR-targeted CT-based prostate radiotherapy.

[1]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Clare Allen,et al.  How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate? , 2006, European urology.

[3]  A Jani,et al.  TU-F-BRF-02: MR-US Prostate Registration Using Patient-Specific Tissue Elasticity Property Prior for MR-Targeted, TRUS-Guided HDR Brachytherapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[4]  J Alfred Witjes,et al.  Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers. , 2005, Radiology.

[5]  Roberto Orecchia,et al.  MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Xiaofeng Yang,et al.  Prostate CT segmentation method based on nonrigid registration in ultrasound-guided CT-based HDR prostate brachytherapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[7]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Efficient Convex Optimization Approach to 3D Non-rigid MR-TRUS Registration , 2013, MICCAI.

[9]  Kazuro Sugimura,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: Comparison of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Tom Vercauteren,et al.  Diffeomorphic demons: Efficient non-parametric image registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Improved image registration by sparse patch-based deformation estimation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[12]  Hashim Uddin Ahmed,et al.  Will focal therapy become a standard of care for men with localized prostate cancer? , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[13]  D Thwaites,et al.  An evaluation of four CT-MRI co-registration techniques for radiotherapy treatment planning of prone rectal cancer patients. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  D. Gladstone,et al.  Prostate seed implant quality assessment using MR and CT image fusion. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Oliver Sartor,et al.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[16]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Feature‐based groupwise registration by hierarchical anatomical correspondence detection , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[17]  F. Beuvon,et al.  Multiparametric MRI is helpful to predict tumor focality, stage, and size in patients diagnosed with unilateral low-risk prostate cancer , 2011, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[18]  Xiaofeng Yang,et al.  WE-EF-210-08: BEST IN PHYSICS (IMAGING): 3D Prostate Segmentation in Ultrasound Images Using Patch-Based Anatomical Feature , 2015 .

[19]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[20]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A statistical deformation prior for non-rigid image and shape registration , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[21]  Jesper Carl,et al.  MR-CT registration using a Ni-Ti prostate stent in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 2013, Medical physics.

[22]  Zhengyang Zhou,et al.  Automated segmentation of the parotid gland based on atlas registration and machine learning: a longitudinal MRI study in head-and-neck radiation therapy. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Automatic 3D segmentation of ultrasound images using atlas registration and statistical texture prior , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[24]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Imaging techniques for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy , 2009, Nature Reviews Urology.

[25]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Prostate cancer: sextant localization at MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging before prostatectomy--results of ACRIN prospective multi-institutional clinicopathologic study. , 2009, Radiology.

[27]  B. Daniel,et al.  Mapping of the prostate in endorectal coil-based MRI/MRSI and CT: a deformable registration and validation study. , 2004, Medical physics.

[28]  Baowei Fei,et al.  3D prostate segmentation of ultrasound images combining longitudinal image registration and machine learning , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[29]  A. Evans,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with multi‐parametric MRI: Logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion‐weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  François Cornud,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2‐weighted, dynamic contrast‐enhanced and diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2011, BJU international.

[31]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: Application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[32]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. , 2011, Radiology.