Musical pattern recognition: A comparison of listening to and studying tonal structures and tonal ambiguities.

Two experiments tested responses to short tone sequences of varying harmonic structure. In the first, listeners from three levels of previous musical training detected alterations of the sequences in a short-term recognition task. In the second, highly trained musicians rated the structure of the sequences under home-study conditions with no time constraints imposed. Both recognition and rating responses indicated a discrimination between tonal sequences and sequences where tonal rules were relaxed or violated. The raters from the second experiment were, however, more sensitive to structural variations within modulating and nondiatonic sequences and were less guided by overall pitch contour than were the liteners of the first experiment, including the musically trained listeners. The results are discussed in terms of the strategies available to detect melodic structure under different time constraints. Within the real-time constraints of a recognition test, listeners apprehend simple transformational rules. With study time in which the sequence may be analyzed through a series of hypotheses about structural properties, added symmetries become apparent.

[1]  D J Mewhort,et al.  Perception of structure in short melodic sequences. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty. , 1963 .

[3]  J. Bartlett,et al.  PSYCHOMUSICOLOGY Spring 1981 THE IMPORTANCE OF 'INTERVAL INFORMATION IN LONG-TERM MEMORY FOR MELODIES , 1981 .

[4]  Paul C. Vitz,et al.  A coded element model of the perceptual processing of sequential stimuli. , 1969 .

[5]  W. Jay Dowling,et al.  Recognition of transposed melodies: a key-distance effect in developmental perspective. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  F. Restle,et al.  Coding of nonsense vs the detection of patterns , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[7]  D. Deutsch Tones and Numbers: Specificity of Interference in Immediate Memory , 1970, Science.

[8]  James C. Carlsen Some factors which influence melodic expectancy , 1981 .

[9]  Lola L. Cuddy Musical rules and pitch judgment , 1981 .

[10]  L. Cuddy,et al.  Melody recognition: the experimental application of musical rules. , 1979, Canadian journal of psychology.

[11]  Some tonal determinants of melodic memory. , 1933 .

[12]  Mari Riess Jones,et al.  AUDITORY PATTERNS: STUDIES IN THE PERCEPTION OF STRUCTURE , 1978 .

[13]  Annabel J. Cohen,et al.  Recognition of Transposed Melodic Sequences , 1976 .

[14]  L L Cuddy,et al.  Absolute judgment of musically-related pure tones. , 1971, Canadian journal of psychology.

[15]  L. Cuddy,et al.  Recognition memory for pitch of fixed and roving stimulus tones , 1972 .

[16]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[17]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[18]  Robert M. Gottsdanker Experimenting in psychology , 1978 .