Burst Fracture in the Metastatically Involved Spine: Development, Validation, and Parametric Analysis of a Three-Dimensional Poroelastic Finite-Element Model

Study Design. A finite-element study and in vitro experimental validation was performed for a parametric investigation of features that contribute to burst fracture risk in the metastatically involved spine. Objectives. To develop and validate a three-dimensional poroelastic model of a metastatically compromised vertebral segment, to evaluate the effect of lytic lesions on vertebral strains and pressures, and to determine the influence of loading and motion segment status (bone density, pedicle involvement, disc degeneration, and tumor size) on the relative risk of burst fracture initiation. Summary of Background Data. Finite-element analysis has been used successfully to predict failure loads and fracture patterns for bone. Although models for vertebra affected with tumors have been presented, these have not been thoroughly validated experimentally. Consequently, their predictive capabilities remain uncertain. Methods. A three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model of the first lumbar vertebra and adjacent intervertebral discs, including a tumor of variable size, was developed. To validate the model, 12 cadaver spinal motion segments were tested in axial compression, in intact condition, and with simulated osteolytic defects. Features of the validated model were parametrically varied to investigate the effects of tumor size, trabecular bone density, pedicle involvement, applied loads, loading rates, and disc degeneration using outcome variables of vertebral bulge and vertebral axial deformation. Results. Consistent trends between the experimental data and model predictions were observed. Overall, the model results suggest that tumor size contributes most toward the risk of initiating burst fracture, followed by the applied load magnitude and bone density. Conclusions. The parametric analysis suggests that the principal factors affecting the initiation of burst fracture in metastatically affected vertebrae are tumor size, magnitude of spinal loading, and bone density. Consequently, patient-specific measures of these factors should be factored into decisions regarding clinical prophylaxis. Pedicle involvement or disc degeneration was less important according to the outcome measures in this study.

[1]  W. Hayes,et al.  Strength reductions of thoracic vertebrae in the presence of transcortical osseous defects: effects of defect location, pedicle disruption, and defect size , 1993, European Spine Journal.

[2]  K Kaneda,et al.  Influence of Disc Degeneration on Mechanism of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures , 1992, Spine.

[3]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  T. M. Keaveny,et al.  Dependence of Intertrabecular Permeability on Flow Direction and Anatomic Site , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  W C Hayes,et al.  Computed tomography‐based finite element analysis predicts failure loads and fracture patterns for vertebral sections , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  S. Glassman,et al.  A Human Cadaver Model for Determination of Pathologic Fracture Threshold Resulting From Tumorous Destruction of the Vertebral Body , 1998, Spine.

[7]  T David,et al.  Rheology of Bovine Bone Marrow , 1989, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  W C Hayes,et al.  Structural consequences of endosteal metastatic lesions in long bones , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  W C Hayes,et al.  Load Sharing Between the Shell and Centrum in the Lumbar Vertebral Body , 1997, Spine.

[10]  K. Harrington,et al.  Metastatic disease of the spine. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  A. Tencer,et al.  Mechanism of the Burst Fracture in the Thoracolumbar Spine: The Effect of Loading Rate , 1995, Spine.

[12]  W. Hayes,et al.  Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  C. Whyne,et al.  Parametric finite element analysis of vertebral bodies affected by tumors. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  B. Vernon‐roberts,et al.  Degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine and their sequelae. , 1977, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[15]  J Mizrahi,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of simulated metastatic lesions in the lumbar vertebral body. , 1992, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[16]  R Huiskes,et al.  From structure to process, from organ to cell: recent developments of FE-analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  C. Whyne,et al.  Effect of the Pedicle and Posterior Arch on Vertebral Body Strength Predictions in Finite Element Modeling , 1998, Spine.

[18]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. , 1987, Bone.

[19]  M. Adams,et al.  The Mechanical Function of the Lumbar Apophyseal Joints , 1983, Spine.

[20]  Matthew J. Silva,et al.  Predicting Failure of Thoracic Vertebrae With Simulated and Actual Metastatic Defects , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  C. Whyne,et al.  Biphasic Material Properties of Lytic Bone Metastases , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  A B Schultz,et al.  Loads on the lumbar trunk during level walking , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  DAVID A. WONG,et al.  Spinal Metastases: The Obvious, the Occult, and the Impostors , 1990, Spine.

[24]  W. Hayes,et al.  Postfracture Instability of Vertebrae With Simulated Defects Can Be Predicted From Computed Tomography Data , 2000, Spine.

[25]  W. Hayes,et al.  Strength reductions from metastatic cortical defects in long bones , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[26]  K. Kaneda,et al.  Risk factors and probability of vertebral body collapse in metastases of the thoracic and lumbar spine. , 1997, Spine.

[27]  J. Moran,et al.  A Morphometric Study of Human Lumbar and Selected Thoracic Vertebrae , 1987, Spine.

[28]  A. Schultz,et al.  Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  W. Hayes,et al.  Strength reductions from trabecular destruction within thoracic vertebrae. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[30]  B. Snyder,et al.  Noninvasive Imaging Predicts Failure Load of the Spine with Simulated Osteolytic Defects*† , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  V C Mow,et al.  Alterations in the mechanical behavior of the human lumbar nucleus pulposus with degeneration and aging , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  J. Meder,et al.  Spinal metastases with neurological manifestations. Review of 600 cases. , 1983, Journal of neurosurgery.