Examining the Effects of Flexible Online Exams on Students' Engagement in E-Learning.

Online assessments are essential parts of online learning. There are some debates on quality of online assessments. Nevertheless the study considered online exams as an instructional activity and aimed to examine the effects of online exams on students’ engagements related to course goals. The study was conducted on two cases, which are asynchronous online Bachelor’s Degree Completion programs. While students were able to attend an exam in a day in the first case, students in the second case were allowed to attend exams anytime in a week. In order to collect data about views and preparations of students for online exams, 36 interviews were carried out. According to results, students had some individual and collaborative activities in the process of preparation for online exams. Most preferred collaborative activities included lecturing to each other, working on practice questions and getting informal instructions from experts. In general, students found online exams beneficial in terms of learning. In relatively low weighted online exams, communications between online students should not be seen as a problem, even if they have during the exam.

[1]  James Hartley,et al.  Time of day, exam performance and new technology , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  Joanna Bull,et al.  A Blueprint for Computer-Assisted Assessment , 2003 .

[3]  Janet E. Wall.  Technology-Delivered Assessment: Diamonds or Rocks? ERIC/CASS Digest. , 2000 .

[4]  Darren Pullen,et al.  Case study of a computer based examination system , 2009 .

[5]  Andrew J. Elliot,et al.  Competence and Motivation: Competence as the Core of Achievement Motivation. , 2005 .

[6]  Sandra Kerka,et al.  Assessing Learners Online. Practitioner File. , 2000 .

[7]  J. Keller.  Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach , 2009 .

[8]  Joey F. George,et al.  Group support systems and deceptive communication , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[9]  Berwyn Clayton,et al.  assessment development vocational education quality online quality online training training , 2003 .

[10]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  The importance of participant interaction in online environments , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Joanna Bull,et al.  Computer-assisted assessment in higher education , 1999 .

[12]  N. Rowe.  Cheating in Online Student Assessment: Beyond Plagiarism , 2004 .

[13]  Huaiqing Wang,et al.  Intelligent agent supported personalization for virtual learning environments , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  Alan C. Bugbee,et al.  The Equivalence of Paper-and-Pencil and Computer-Based Testing. , 1996 .

[15]  Darren Pullen,et al.  Schooling without borders: using ICT for flexible delivery of education , 2007 .

[16]  Mike Moore,et al.  The Effects of Distance Learning: A Summary of Literature. Research Monograph Number 2. , 1990 .

[17]  Melissa R. Olt,et al.  ETHICS AND DISTANCE EDUCATION: STRATEGIES FOR MINIMIZING ACADEMIC DISHONESTY IN ONLINE ASSESSMENT , 2002 .

[18]  I. Erturk,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Online Assessment: A Case Study , 2004 .

[19]  Jeffrey R. Stowell,et al.  Effects of Online Testing on Student Exam Performance and Test Anxiety , 2010 .

[20]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Trust and deception in mediated communication , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[21]  Oskar R. Harmon,et al.  Are Online Exams an Invitation to Cheat? , 2007 .

[22]  William A. Horton,et al.  Designing Web-Based Training , 2000 .

[23]  H. Leeson.  The Mode Effect: A Literature Review of Human and Technological Issues in Computerized Testing , 2006 .

[24]  Allan Ellis,et al.  The prevalence and characteristics of online assessment in Australian universities , 2006 .