Being in the thick of in-the-wild studies: the challenges and insights of researcher participation

We describe the insights and challenges offered by researcher participation in in-the-wild studies through the comparison of two prototype evaluations with varying levels of researcher participation. By reflecting on these studies we expose different facets of the researcher's role when interacting with participants in in-the-wild studies. We also demonstrate the value of researcher participation in contributing to the way a researcher understands participant responses: aiding rapport, promoting empathy and stimulating the researcher to reflect on their own assumptions.

[1]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface , 2011, CHI.

[2]  William Buxton,et al.  Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time) , 2008, CHI.

[3]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Ambient influence: can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change? , 2010, UbiComp.

[4]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods , 2011, CHI.

[5]  Francis Jambon,et al.  User experience evaluation in the wild , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Buzzing to play: lessons learned from an in the wild study of real-time vibrotactile feedback , 2011, CHI.

[7]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Divining a Digital Future - Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing , 2011 .

[8]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  When the designer becomes the user: designing a system for therapists by becoming a therapist , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory , 2011, INTR.

[10]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  Reflexivity in digital anthropology , 2011, CHI.

[11]  Richard Harper,et al.  The Organisation in Ethnography –A Discussion of Ethnographic Fieldwork Programs in CSCW , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[12]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[13]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Why It's Worth the Hassle: The Value of In-Situ Studies When Designing Ubicomp , 2007, UbiComp.

[14]  Claire Petitmengin,et al.  Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness , 2006 .

[15]  Ann Light,et al.  Adding method to meaning: A technique for exploring peoples' experience with technology , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Gillian R. Hayes.  The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction , 2011, TCHI.

[17]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Empathy and experience in HCI , 2008, CHI.

[18]  William W. Gaver.  Cultural commentators: Non-native interpretations as resources for polyphonic assessment , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Tobie Kerridge,et al.  Anatomy of a failure: how we knew when our design went wrong, and what we learned from it , 2009, CHI.

[20]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[21]  Karen E. Till,et al.  Ethnography and participant observation , 2010 .