Machine-based learning of predictive models in organic solvent nanofiltration: Pure and mixed solvent flux

Abstract During the last decades, the interest in organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN), both in academia and industry, increased substantially. OSN provides great potential for an energy-efficient separation of complex chemical mixtures with dissolved solutes in the range of 200–1000 Dalton. In contrast to conventional thermal separation processes, the pressure-driven membrane separation operates at mild temperatures without energy intensive phase transition. However, the complex interaction of different phenomena in the mass transfer through the membrane complicate the prediction of membrane performance severely, such that OSN is virtually not considered as an option in conceptual process design. Several attempts have been made to determine predictive models, which allow the determination of at least pure solvent flux through a given membrane. While these models correlate different important physical properties of the solvents and are derived from physical understanding, they provide a limited accuracy and not all of their parameters are identifiable based on available data. In contrast to previous approaches, this work presents a machine learning based approach for the identification of membrane-specific models for the prediction of solvent permeance. The data-driven approach, which is based on genetic programming, generates predictive models that show superior results in terms of accuracy and parameter precision when compared to previously proposed models. Applied to two respective sets of permeation data, the developed models were able to describe the permeance of various solvents with a mean percentage error below 9% and to predict different solvents with a mean percentage error of 15%. Further, the method was applied to solvent mixtures successfully.

[1]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Modelling of solute transport in non-aqueous nanofiltration , 2006 .

[2]  Wolfgang Marquardt,et al.  Optimal Experimental Design for Discriminating Numerous Model Candidates: The AWDC Criterion , 2010 .

[3]  E. S. Tarleton,et al.  Solvent flux through dense polymeric nanofiltration membranes , 2004 .

[4]  Luc Boullart,et al.  Genetic programming: principles and applications , 2001 .

[5]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Solvent dependent solute solubility governs retention in silicone based organic solvent nanofiltration , 2016 .

[6]  M. Skiborowski,et al.  Solvent dependent membrane-solute sensitivity of OSN membranes , 2018, Journal of Membrane Science.

[7]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Machine learning: Overview of the recent progresses and implications for the process systems engineering field , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Kunal Roy,et al.  A Primer on QSAR/QSPR Modeling: Fundamental Concepts , 2015 .

[9]  C. Bellona,et al.  Application of quantitative structure–property relationships (QSPRs) to predict the rejection of organic solutes by nanofiltration , 2013 .

[10]  Uwe Kätzel,et al.  An heuristic-based selection process for organic solvent nanofiltration membranes , 2017 .

[11]  J. Szydłowski,et al.  Physicochemical Properties of Solutions of Amides in H2O and in D2O , 2001 .

[12]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Transport model for solvent permeation through nanofiltration membranes , 2006 .

[13]  G. Amy,et al.  A QSAR model for predicting rejection of emerging contaminants (pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors) by nanofiltration membranes. , 2010, Water research.

[14]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Inference , 2004 .

[15]  B. Dabir,et al.  Membrane fouling in microfiltration of oil-in-water emulsions; a comparison between constant pressure blocking laws and genetic programming (GP) model , 2013 .

[16]  Andrew G. Livingston,et al.  An improved phenomenological model for prediction of solvent permeation through ceramic NF and UF membranes , 2012 .

[17]  David C. Miller,et al.  Learning surrogate models for simulation‐based optimization , 2014 .

[18]  Mohamed Khayet,et al.  Application of response surface methodology and experimental design in direct contact membrane distillation , 2007 .

[19]  Mitsutoshi Nakajima,et al.  Membrane concentration and separation of L-aspartic acid and L-phenylalanine derivatives in organic solvents , 1996 .

[20]  David Hasson,et al.  Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes: Part II. Transport model , 2000 .

[21]  G. Douhéret,et al.  Thermodynamic behavior of water-acetonitrile mixtures excess volumes and viscosities , 1975 .

[22]  Gary L. Amy,et al.  Artificial neural network models based on QSAR for predicting rejection of neutral organic compounds by polyamide nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes , 2009 .

[23]  K. Werth,et al.  The potential of organic solvent nanofiltration processes for oleochemical industry , 2017 .

[24]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Polymeric nanofiltration of binary water-alcohol mixtures : Influence of feed composition and membrane properties on permeability and rejection , 2005 .

[25]  D. K. Hazra,et al.  Viscosities and excess molar volumes for acetonitrile + methanol at 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15 K , 1995 .

[26]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  A Field Guide to Genetic Programming , 2008 .

[27]  E. S. Tarleton,et al.  Solvent-induced swelling of membranes : Measurements and influence in nanofiltration , 2006 .

[28]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Prediction of membrane fouling in the pilot-scale microfiltration system using genetic programming. , 2009 .

[29]  David Hasson,et al.  Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part I: investigation of parameters affecting solvent flux , 1999 .

[30]  G. Ritzoulis,et al.  Densities, viscosities, and dielectric constants of acetonitrile + toluene at 15, 25, and 35 .degree.C , 1986 .

[31]  A. C. Filippou,et al.  Thermodynamic investigation of N,N-dimethylformamide/toluene binary mixtures in the temperature range from 278.15 to 293.15 K , 2006 .

[32]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  ANTIGONE: Algorithms for coNTinuous / Integer Global Optimization of Nonlinear Equations , 2014, Journal of Global Optimization.

[33]  R. L. Riley,et al.  Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes , 1965 .

[34]  Wolfgang Marquardt,et al.  A Hybrid Evolutionary–Deterministic Optimization Approach for Conceptual Design , 2015 .

[35]  K. Ebert,et al.  A transport model for organophilic nanofiltration , 2006 .

[36]  Rui Oliveira,et al.  Analysis of solvent flux through nanofiltration membranes by mechanistic, chemometric and hybrid modelling , 2007 .

[37]  J. Degrève,et al.  Coupled series–parallel resistance model for transport of solvent through inorganic nanofiltration membranes , 2009 .

[38]  A. Górak,et al.  On the reliability of lab-scale experiments for the determination of membrane specific flux measurements in organic solvent nanofiltration , 2019, Chemical Engineering Research and Design.

[39]  J. A. Quinn,et al.  Restricted transport in small pores. A model for steric exclusion and hindered particle motion. , 1974, Biophysical journal.

[40]  Andrew G. Livingston,et al.  Solvent transport in organic solvent nanofiltration membranes , 2005 .

[41]  M. Randic Characterization of molecular branching , 1975 .

[42]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Can the variance in membrane performance influence the design of organic solvent nanofiltration processes? , 2019, Journal of Membrane Science.

[43]  Ryan P. Lively,et al.  Seven chemical separations to change the world , 2016, Nature.

[44]  Martin Mönnigmann,et al.  Systematic identifiability testing for unambiguous mechanistic modeling – application to JAK-STAT, MAP kinase, and NF-κB signaling pathway models , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[45]  Ferenc Szeifert,et al.  Genetic programming for the identification of nonlinear input-output models , 2005 .

[46]  Lloyd S. White,et al.  Transport properties of a polyimide solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane , 2002 .

[47]  S. Hanini,et al.  Prediction of the rejection of organic compounds (neutral and ionic) by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes using neural networks , 2015, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering.

[48]  J. G. Wijmans,et al.  The solution-diffusion model: a review , 1995 .

[49]  Dibakar Bhattacharyya,et al.  Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling , 2001 .

[50]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Fluxes and rejections for nanofiltration with solvent stable polymeric membranes in water, ethanol and n-hexane , 2002 .

[51]  Nikolaos V. Sahinidis,et al.  Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs: A theoretical and computational study , 2004, Math. Program..

[52]  Gyorgy Szekely,et al.  Molecular separation with organic solvent nanofiltration: a critical review. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[53]  G. Box,et al.  Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. , 1990 .

[54]  Bart Van der Bruggen,et al.  Removal of API's (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients) from Organic Solvents by Nanofiltration , 2007 .