Treatment of skewed multi-dimensional training data to facilitate the task of engineering neural models

Successful application of neural network models relies heavily on problem-dependent internal parameters. As the theory does not facilitate the choice of the optimal parameters of neural models, these can solely be obtained through a tedious trial-and-error process. The process requires performing multiple training simulations with various network parameters, until satisfactory performance criteria of a neural model are met. In literature, it has been shown that neural models are not consistently good in prediction under highly skewed data. Consequently, the cost of engineering neural models rises in such circumstance to seek for appropriate internal parameters. In this paper the aim is to show that a recently proposed treatment of highly skewed data eases the task of practitioners in engineering neural network models to meet satisfactory performance criteria. As the applications of neural models grows dramatically in diverse engineering domains, the understanding of the treatment show indispensable practical values.

[1]  K. G. Ranga Raju,et al.  Fractionwise calculation of bed load transport , 1996 .

[2]  Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu,et al.  Generalized regression neural network in modelling river sediment yield , 2006, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[3]  Yafei Jia,et al.  Nonuniform sediment transport in alluvial rivers , 2000 .

[4]  R. J. Garde,et al.  BED LOAD TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT MIXTURES , 1986 .

[5]  Van Rijn,et al.  Sediment transport; Part I, Bed load transport , 1984 .

[6]  A. Esposito,et al.  Optimal Parameters in Neural Network Models for Speech Phoneme Characterization , 2001, WIRN.

[7]  Bay Arinze,et al.  The predictive accuracy of artificial neural networks and multiple regression in the case of skewed data: exploration of some issues , 2000 .

[8]  Hikmet Kerem Ciğizoğlu,et al.  Suspended Sediment Estimation and Forecasting using Artificial Neural Networks , 2002 .

[9]  Usha A. Kumar,et al.  Comparison of neural networks and regression analysis: A new insight , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Hosni Ghedira,et al.  The effect of some internal neural network parameters on SAR texture classification performance , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[11]  John A. Bullinaria,et al.  Evolving neural networks: Is it really worth the effort? , 2005, ESANN.

[12]  Frank Pettersson,et al.  Method for the selection of inputs and structure of feedforward neural networks , 2006, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[13]  George-Christopher Vosniakos,et al.  Initialisation improvement in engineering feedforward ANN models , 2005, ESANN.

[14]  César Hervás-Martínez,et al.  An alternative approach for neural network evolution with a genetic algorithm: Crossover by combinatorial optimization , 2006, Neural Networks.

[15]  H. Altun,et al.  Treatment of multi-dimensional data to enhance neural network estimators in regression problems , 2006 .

[16]  H. Nagy,et al.  Prediction of Sediment Load Concentration in Rivers using Artificial Neural Network Model , 2002 .

[17]  Yee-Meng Chiew,et al.  Analysis of Initiation of Sediment Suspension from Bed Load , 1999 .

[18]  R. J. Garde,et al.  SUSPENDED LOAD TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT MIXTURES , 1986 .

[19]  Khashayar Khorasani,et al.  A new strategy for adaptively constructing multilayer feedforward neural networks , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[20]  H. Einstein,et al.  The Bed-Load Function for Sediment Transportation in Open Channel Flows , 1950 .

[21]  R. J. Garde,et al.  Bed Load Transport of Coarse Nonuniform Sediment , 1984 .