A Computationally Assisted Methodology for Preference-Guided Conceptual Design

We present an interactive, computationally assisted, methodology for capturing and incorporating designer preferences into a numerical search for design concepts. An initial pool of manually created designs is parameterized and used in a computational search that recombines features to form new designs in a semi-automated way. Designs are evaluated quantitatively by performance calculations and evaluated qualitatively by human designers. Designer preference is captured when visual representations of designs are presented to the designer for subjective evaluation. The methodology searches for optimally performing designs, guided by quantitative performance models and designer preferences. The methodology couples the speed of computational searches with the ability of human designers to subjectively evaluate unmodeled objectives. The new methodology is demonstrated with a vehicle architecture example, which generates a set of designs that progressively improves in performance and more fully meets designer preference. The proposed method brings the ability to generate numerous, optimally performing solutions across a wide solution space, in an efficient and human-centered way, and does so in the early stages of design.

[1]  Dan Ventura,et al.  Music recommendation and query-by-content using Self-Organizing Maps , 2009, 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[2]  Hideyuki Takagi,et al.  Interactive evolutionary computation: fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[3]  J. Cagan,et al.  An Extended Pattern Search Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Component Layout , 2000 .

[4]  A. Messac,et al.  Concept Selection Using s-Pareto Frontiers , 2003 .

[5]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Web-based morphological charts for concept design in collaborative product development , 1999, J. Intell. Manuf..

[6]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[7]  R. Balling,et al.  Optimal packaging of complex parametric solids according to mass property criteria , 1994 .

[8]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Measurement methods for product evaluation , 1995 .

[9]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[10]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  A Numerical Optimization Search Strategy for Exploring Morphological Charts , 2009 .

[11]  A. Bowman,et al.  Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis : the kernel approach with S-plus illustrations , 1999 .

[12]  A. Messac,et al.  Smart Pareto filter: obtaining a minimal representation of multiobjective design space , 2004 .

[13]  David G. Ullman,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 1992 .

[14]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[15]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[16]  Robert Stone,et al.  A Validation Study of an Automated Concept Generator Design Tool , 2006 .

[17]  Daniel A. McAdams,et al.  A Computational Technique for Concept Generation , 2005 .

[18]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Architectural layout design optimization , 2002 .

[19]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Interactive design optimization of architectural layouts , 2002 .

[20]  William C. Regli,et al.  Functional Modeling of Engineering Designs for the Semantic Web , 2003, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[21]  Janis Terpenny,et al.  Application of a Genetic Algorithm to Concept Variant Selection , 2006, DAC 2006.

[22]  Ian C. Parmee,et al.  Evolutionary and adaptive computing in engineering design , 2001 .

[23]  Daniel A. McAdams,et al.  An Interactive Morphological Matrix Computational Design Tool: A Hybrid of Two Methods , 2007 .

[24]  Garrett J. Barnum A Computationally-assisted Methodology for Rapid Exploration of Design Possibilities in Conceptual Design , 2010 .

[25]  David Norton Learning about creativity from an artificial artist , 2009, C&C '09.