Polysome-profiling in small tissue samples

Polysome-profiling is commonly used to study genome wide patterns of translational efficiency, i.e. the translatome. The standard approach for collecting efficiently translated polysome-associated RNA results in laborious extraction of RNA from a large volume spread across multiple fractions. This property makes polysome-profiling inconvenient for larger experimental designs or samples with low RNA amounts such as primary cells or frozen tissues. To address this we optimized a non-linear sucrose gradient which reproducibly enriches for mRNAs associated with >3 ribosomes in only one or two fractions, thereby reducing sample handling 5-10 fold. The technique can be applied to cells and frozen tissue samples from biobanks, and generates RNA with a quality reflecting the starting material. When coupled with smart-seq2, a single-cell RNA sequencing technique, translatomes from small tissue samples can be obtained. Translatomes acquired using optimized non-linear gradients are very similar to those obtained when applying linear gradients. Polysome-profiling using optimized nonlinear gradients in HCT-116 cells with or without p53 identified a translatome associated with p53 status under serum starvation. Thus, here we present a polysome-profiling technique applicable to larger studies, primary cells where RNA amount is low and frozen tissue samples.

[1]  A. Rich,et al.  A multiple ribosomal structure in protein synthesis. , 1963, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  A. Gierer Function of aggregated reticulocyte ribosomes in protein synthesis. , 1963, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  H. Green,et al.  Changes in RNA in relation to growth of the fibroblast. IV. Alterations in theproduction and processing of mRNA and rRNA in resting and growing cells , 1976, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  C. Thompson,et al.  Regulation of lymphokine messenger RNA stability by a surface-mediated T cell activation pathway. , 1989, Science.

[5]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[6]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Translation initiation of ornithine decarboxylase and nucleocytoplasmic transport of cyclin D1 mRNA are increased in cells overexpressing eukaryotic initiation factor 4E. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  Richard Simon,et al.  A random variance model for detection of differential gene expression in small microarray experiments , 2003, Bioinform..

[9]  Robert Gentleman,et al.  Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association , 2007, Bioinform..

[10]  S. Zackrisson,et al.  Improved survival rate for women with interval breast cancer – results from the breast cancer screening programme in Malmö, Sweden 1976–1999 , 2007, Journal of medical screening.

[11]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[12]  Eric T. Wang,et al.  An Abundance of Ubiquitously Expressed Genes Revealed by Tissue Transcriptome Sequence Data , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis in Vivo of Translation with Nucleotide Resolution Using Ribosome Profiling , 2009, Science.

[14]  M. Robinson,et al.  A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data , 2010, Genome Biology.

[15]  R. Nadon,et al.  Identification of differential translation in genome wide studies , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Selbach,et al.  Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control , 2011, Nature.

[17]  Philippe P Roux,et al.  Regulation of mRNA translation by signaling pathways. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[18]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Principles of translational control: an overview. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[19]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Distinct Translational Control in CD4+ T Cell Subsets , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[20]  D. Ruggero Translational control in cancer etiology. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[21]  V. P. Collins,et al.  The eEF2 Kinase Confers Resistance to Nutrient Deprivation by Blocking Translation Elongation , 2013, Cell.

[22]  C. Holt,et al.  The Central Dogma Decentralized: New Perspectives on RNA Function and Local Translation in Neurons , 2013, Neuron.

[23]  Pedro G. Ferreira,et al.  CPEB1 coordinates alternative 3′-UTR formation with translational regulation , 2013, Nature.

[24]  L. Foster,et al.  Protein synthesis rate is the predominant regulator of protein expression during differentiation , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[25]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Translational control of immune responses: from transcripts to translatomes , 2014, Nature Immunology.

[26]  Åsa K. Björklund,et al.  Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2 , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[27]  J. Connett,et al.  Fibrotic extracellular matrix activates a profibrotic positive feedback loop. , 2014, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[28]  T. Alain,et al.  Polysome Fractionation and Analysis of Mammalian Translatomes on a Genome-wide Scale , 2014, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[29]  O. Larsson,et al.  mTOR coordinates protein synthesis, mitochondrial activity and proliferation , 2015, Cell cycle.

[30]  Matthew E. Ritchie,et al.  limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Targeting the translation machinery in cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[32]  Maxwell R. Mumbach,et al.  Dynamic profiling of the protein life cycle in response to pathogens , 2015, Science.

[33]  Patrick B. F. O'Connor,et al.  Oxygen and glucose deprivation induces widespread alterations in mRNA translation within 20 minutes , 2015, Genome Biology.

[34]  J. Pelletier,et al.  nanoCAGE reveals 5′ UTR features that define specific modes of translation of functionally related MTOR-sensitive mRNAs , 2016, Genome research.

[35]  R. Aebersold,et al.  On the Dependency of Cellular Protein Levels on mRNA Abundance , 2016, Cell.

[36]  R. Kiessling,et al.  IL-15 activates mTOR and primes stress-activated gene expression leading to prolonged antitumor capacity of NK cells. , 2016, Blood.

[37]  Nicholas T. Ingolia Ribosome Footprint Profiling of Translation throughout the Genome , 2016, Cell.

[38]  Patrick B. F. O'Connor,et al.  Insights into the mechanisms of eukaryotic translation gained with ribosome profiling , 2016, Nucleic acids research.