Accuracy of low‐dose proton CT image registration for pretreatment alignment verification in reference to planning proton CT

Abstract Purpose Proton CT (pCT) has the ability to reduce inherent uncertainties in proton treatment by directly measuring the relative proton stopping power with respect to water, thereby avoiding the uncertain conversion of X‐ray CT Hounsfield unit to relative stopping power and the deleterious effect of X‐ ray CT artifacts. The purpose of this work was to further evaluate the potential of pCT for pretreatment positioning using experimental pCT data of a head phantom. Methods The performance of a 3D image registration algorithm was tested with pCT reconstructions of a pediatric head phantom. A planning pCT simulation scan of the phantom was obtained with 200 MeV protons and reconstructed with a 3D filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm followed by iterative reconstruction and a representative pretreatment pCT scan was reconstructed with FBP only to save reconstruction time. The pretreatment pCT scan was rigidly transformed by prescribing random errors with six degrees of freedom or deformed by the deformation field derived from a head and neck cancer patient to the pretreatment pCT reconstruction, respectively. After applying the rigid or deformable image registration algorithm to retrieve the original pCT image before transformation, the accuracy of the registration was assessed. To simulate very low‐dose imaging for patient setup, the proton CT images were reconstructed with 100%, 50%, 25%, and 12.5% of the total number of histories of the original planning pCT simulation scan, respectively. Results The residual errors in image registration were lower than 1 mm and 1° of magnitude regardless of the anatomic directions and imaging dose. The mean residual errors ranges found for rigid image registration were from −0.29 ± 0.09 to 0.51 ± 0.50 mm for translations and from −0.05 ± 0.13 to 0.08 ± 0.08 degrees for rotations. The percentages of sub‐millimetric errors found, for deformable image registration, were between 63.5% and 100%. Conclusion This experimental head phantom study demonstrated the potential of low‐dose pCT imaging for 3D image registration. Further work is needed to confirm the value pCT for pretreatment image‐guided proton therapy.

[1]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  Marco Durante,et al.  Dosimetric effects of residual uncertainties in carbon ion treatment of head chordoma. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[4]  A Ghebremedhin,et al.  Water-equivalent path length calibration of a prototype proton CT scanner. , 2012, Medical physics.

[5]  G. Coutrakon,et al.  Detector development for Proton Computed Tomography (pCT) , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[6]  S N Penfold,et al.  A maximum likelihood proton path formalism for application in proton computed tomography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[7]  Reinhard W. Schulte,et al.  Design and construction of the 1st proton CT scanner , 2013 .

[8]  Gregory C Sharp,et al.  Scale invariant feature transform in adaptive radiation therapy: a tool for deformable image registration assessment and re-planning indication , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Blake Schultze,et al.  A Fast Experimental Scanner for Proton CT: Technical Performance and First Experience With Phantom Scans , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[10]  David R. Haynor,et al.  Nonrigid multimodality image registration , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  The influence of patient positioning uncertainties in proton radiotherapy on proton range and dose distributions. , 2014, Medical physics.

[12]  Marco Riboldi,et al.  Real-time tumour tracking in particle therapy: technological developments and future perspectives. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  A. Mahajan.  Proton Craniospinal Radiation Therapy: Rationale and Clinical Evidence , 2014 .

[14]  Zuofeng Li,et al.  Five-year outcomes from 3 prospective trials of image-guided proton therapy for prostate cancer. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Zhengrong Liang,et al.  Reconstruction for proton computed tomography by tracing proton trajectories: a Monte Carlo study. , 2006, Medical physics.

[16]  Joao Seco,et al.  A theoretical framework to predict the most likely ion path in particle imaging , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  B. Yeap,et al.  Long-term toxic effects of proton radiotherapy for paediatric medulloblastoma: a phase 2 single-arm study. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  A B Rosenfeld,et al.  Total variation superiorization schemes in proton computed tomography image reconstruction. , 2010, Medical physics.

[19]  Michael J Ackerman,et al.  Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing Api: a technical report on ITK--the Insight Toolkit. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[20]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  N-SIFT: N-DIMENSIONAL SCALE INVARIANT FEATURE TRANSFORM FOR MATCHING MEDICAL IMAGES , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[21]  V Bashkirov,et al.  An evaluation of spatial resolution of a prototype proton CT scanner. , 2016, Medical physics.

[22]  Michael E. Papka,et al.  Distributed and hardware accelerated computing for clinical medical imaging using proton computed tomography (pCT) , 2013, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..