SPREAD - Exploring the decision space in energy systems synthesis

Abstract A method is presented to systematically analyze the decision space in the synthesis of energy supply systems. Commonly, synthesis problems are solved by mathematical optimization yielding a single optimal design. However, optimization is based on a model which never represents reality to perfection. Thus, the designer will be forced to revise parts of the optimal solution. We therefore support the design process by automatically identifying important features of good solutions. For this purpose, we analyze near-optimal solutions. To explore the decision space, we minimize and maximize both the number and the capacity of units while keeping the costs within a specified range. From this analysis, we derive insight into correlations between decisions. To support the decision maker, we represent the range of good design decisions and their correlations in the flowsheet of the energy system. The method is illustrated for the synthesis of an energy system in the pharmaceutical industry.

[1]  Cinzia Colapinto,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis with goal programming in engineering, management and social sciences: a state-of-the art review , 2015, Annals of Operations Research.

[2]  Graham Ault,et al.  Multi-objective planning of distributed energy resources: A review of the state-of-the-art , 2010 .

[3]  B. Li,et al.  Modelling to generate alternatives with an energy system optimization model , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .

[5]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition? , 2016 .

[6]  Andrea Lazzaretto,et al.  Optimum Biorefinery Pathways Selection Using the Integer-Cuts Constraint Method Applied to a MILP Problem , 2015 .

[7]  B. Qvale,et al.  A Combinatorial Method for the Automatic Generation of Multiple, Near-Optimal Heat Exchanger Networks , 2001 .

[8]  François Maréchal,et al.  Model-based optimization of distributed and renewable energy systems in buildings , 2016 .

[9]  André Bardow,et al.  Multi-objective synthesis of energy systems: Efficient identification of design trade-offs , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez,et al.  On the use of filters to facilitate the post-optimal analysis of the Pareto solutions in multi-objective optimization , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[11]  André Bardow,et al.  The optimum is not enough: A near-optimal solution paradigm for energy systems synthesis , 2015 .

[12]  José María Ponce-Ortega,et al.  Optimal design of residential cogeneration systems under uncertainty , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[13]  Enrico Sciubba,et al.  A Brief Review of Methods for the Design and Synthesis Optimization of Energy Systems , 2002 .

[14]  F. Glover.  IMPROVED LINEAR INTEGER PROGRAMMING FORMULATIONS OF NONLINEAR INTEGER PROBLEMS , 1975 .

[15]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A clustering procedure for reducing the number of representative solutions in the Pareto Front of multiobjective optimization problems , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  André Bardow,et al.  How to Explore and Analyze the Decision Space in the Synthesis of Energy Supply Systems , 2016 .

[17]  Mauro Reini,et al.  Multicriteria optimization of a distributed energy supply system for an industrial area , 2013 .

[18]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  Experiments concerning sequential versus simultaneous maximization of objective function and distance , 2008, J. Heuristics.

[19]  Pan Liu,et al.  Deriving multiple near‐optimal solutions to deterministic reservoir operation problems , 2011 .

[20]  Kari Alanne,et al.  Distributed energy generation and sustainable development , 2006 .

[21]  Rand R. Wilcox,et al.  Basic Statistics: Understanding Conventional Methods and Modern Insights , 2009 .

[22]  Zukui Li,et al.  Optimal scenario reduction framework based on distance of uncertainty distribution and output performance: I. Single reduction via mixed integer linear optimization , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[23]  Jochen Steimel,et al.  Optimization‐based support for process design under uncertainty: A case study , 2016 .

[24]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  How to select a small set of diverse solutions to mixed integer programming problems , 2009, Oper. Res. Lett..

[25]  Joseph F. DeCarolis,et al.  Using modeling to generate alternatives (MGA) to expand our thinking on energy futures , 2011 .

[26]  Ximing Cai,et al.  Finding multiple optimal solutions to optimal load distribution problem in hydropower plant , 2012 .

[27]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Modelling and optimization of retrofitting residential energy systems at the urban scale , 2014 .

[28]  François Maréchal,et al.  Decision support for ranking Pareto optimal process designs under uncertain market conditions , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[29]  François Maréchal,et al.  Methods for multi-objective investment and operating optimization of complex energy systems , 2012 .

[30]  E. Balas,et al.  Canonical Cuts on the Unit Hypercube , 1972 .

[31]  Zdravko Kravanja,et al.  The importance of proper economic criteria and process modeling for single- and multi-objective optimizations , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[32]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming , 1955 .

[33]  Philip Voll,et al.  TRusT: A Two-stage Robustness Trade-off approach for the design of decentralized energy supply systems , 2017 .

[34]  Fengqi You,et al.  Sustainable design and synthesis of energy systems , 2015 .

[35]  André Bardow,et al.  Automated superstructure-based synthesis and optimization of distributed energy supply systems , 2013 .

[36]  L. Vandevelde,et al.  Towards low carbon business park energy systems: Classification of techno-economic energy models , 2014 .

[37]  François Maréchal,et al.  Multi-objective, multi-period optimization of district energy systems: IV – A case study , 2015 .