Interplay Between Topology and Social Learning Over Weak Graphs

This work examines a distributed learning problem where the agents of a network form their beliefs about certain hypotheses of interest. Each agent collects streaming (private) data and updates continually its belief by means of a <italic>diffusion</italic> strategy, which blends the agent's data with the beliefs of its neighbors. We focus on <italic>weakly-connected</italic> graphs, where the network is partitioned into sending and receiving sub-networks, and we allow for heterogeneous models across the agents. First, we examine <italic>what</italic> agents learn (<italic>social learning</italic>) and provide an analytical characterization for the long-term beliefs at the agents. Among other effects, the analysis predicts when a leader-follower behavior is possible, where some sending agents control the beliefs of the receiving agents by forcing them to choose a particular and possibly fake hypothesis. Second, we consider the dual or reverse learning problem that reveals <italic>how</italic> agents learn: given the beliefs collected at a receiving agent, we would like to discover the influence that any sending sub-network might have exerted on this receiving agent (<italic>topology learning</italic>). An unexpected interplay between social and topology learning emerges: given <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$H$</tex-math></inline-formula> hypotheses and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$S$</tex-math></inline-formula> sending sub-networks, topology learning can be feasible when <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$H\geq S$</tex-math></inline-formula>. The latter being only a necessary condition, we then examine the feasibility of topology learning for two useful classes of problems. The analysis reveals that a critical element to enable topology learning is a sufficient degree of <italic>diversity</italic> in the statistical models of the sending sub-networks.

[1]  Angelia Nedic,et al.  Distributed optimization over time-varying directed graphs , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks , 2010, Dyn. Games Appl..

[3]  J. Gower Properties of Euclidean and non-Euclidean distance matrices , 1985 .

[4]  M. Alanyali,et al.  Distributed Detection in Sensor Networks With Packet Losses and Finite Capacity Links , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Distributed Detection via Gaussian Running Consensus: Large Deviations Asymptotic Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Bayesian learning in social networks , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[7]  T. Javidi,et al.  Social learning and distributed hypothesis testing , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[8]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed detection with multiple sensors I. Fundamentals , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  Local Tomography of Large Networks Under the Low-Observability Regime , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  Observational learning in an uncertain world , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[11]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Euclidean Distance Matrices: Essential theory, algorithms, and applications , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[12]  Angelia Nedic,et al.  Distributed Optimization Over Time-Varying Directed Graphs , 2015, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[13]  Angelia Nedić,et al.  Fast Convergence Rates for Distributed Non-Bayesian Learning , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  Ali Sayed,et al.  Adaptation, Learning, and Optimization over Networks , 2014, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[15]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[16]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Spread of (Mis)Information in Social Networks , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[17]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  Learning Graph Influence from Social Interactions , 2020, ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[18]  Ali Jadbabaie,et al.  Non-Bayesian Social Learning , 2011, Games Econ. Behav..

[19]  R. Kala,et al.  The Matrix Equation AX - YB = C , 1979 .

[20]  J.-F. Chamberland,et al.  Wireless Sensors in Distributed Detection Applications , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[21]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Social learning and bayesian games in multiagent signal processing: how do local and global decision makers interact? , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[22]  Pooya Molavi,et al.  Information Heterogeneity and the Speed of Learning in Social Networks , 2013 .

[23]  P. Wedin Perturbation theory for pseudo-inverses , 1973 .

[24]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  Estimation and Detection Over Adaptive Networks , 2018 .

[25]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[26]  C. Chamley Rational Herds: Economic Models of Social Learning , 2003 .

[27]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  Learning over social networks via diffusion adaptation , 2012, 2012 Conference Record of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[28]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[29]  P.K. Varshney,et al.  Channel-aware distributed detection in wireless sensor networks , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[30]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  Information Exchange and Learning Dynamics Over Weakly Connected Adaptive Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[31]  Kamiar Rahnama Rad,et al.  Reaching Consensus With Increasing Information , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[32]  Mehmet E. Yildiz,et al.  Binary Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents , 2013, TEAC.

[33]  Lones Smith,et al.  Pathological Outcomes of Observational Learning , 2000 .

[34]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Models for the Diffusion of Beliefs in Social Networks: An Overview , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[35]  Vikram Krishnamurthy,et al.  Interactive Sensing and Decision Making in Social Networks , 2014, Found. Trends Signal Process..

[36]  Santiago Segarra,et al.  Connecting the Dots: Identifying Network Structure via Graph Signal Processing , 2018, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[37]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  Consistent Tomography Under Partial Observations Over Adaptive Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[38]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  Social Learning Over Weakly Connected Graphs , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks.

[39]  Sergio Barbarossa,et al.  Distributed Decision Through Self-Synchronizing Sensor Networks in the Presence of Propagation Delays and Asymmetric Channels , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[40]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  Distributed detection with multiple sensors I. Advanced topics , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[41]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  Exponential Collapse of Social Beliefs over Weakly-connected Heterogeneous Networks , 2019, ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[42]  Alvaro Sandroni,et al.  Non-Bayesian Learning , 2010 .