Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries

This study investigates patterns in the language and type of social sciences and humanities (SSH) publications in non-English speaking European countries to demonstrate that such patterns are related not only to discipline but also to each country’s cultural and historic heritage. We investigate publication patterns that occur across SSH publications of the whole of the SSH and of economics and business, law, and philosophy and theology publications in the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Flanders (Belgium), Norway, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia. We use data from 74,022 peer-reviewed publications from 2014 registered in at least one of the eight countries’ national databases and for 272,376 peer-reviewed publications from the period of 2011–2014 registered in at least one of the seven countries’ national databases (for all countries except Slovakia). Our findings show that publication patterns differ both between fields (e.g. patterns in law differ from those in economics and business in the same way in Flanders and Finland) and within fields (e.g. patterns in law in the Czech Republic differ from patterns in law in Finland). We observe that the publication patterns are stable and quite similar in West European and Nordic countries, whereas in Central and Eastern European countries the publication patterns demonstrate considerable changes. Nevertheless, in all countries, the share of articles and the share of publications in English is on the rise. We conclude with recommendations for science policy and highlight that internationalization policies in non-English speaking countries should consider various starting points and cultural heritages in different countries.

[1]  Steffi Heinecke On The Route Towards Renewal? The Polish Academy Of Sciences In Post-Socialist Context , 2018 .

[2]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Grand challenges in data integration—state of the art and future perspectives: an introduction , 2016, Scientometrics.

[3]  Li Wang,et al.  Bibliometrics in the research assessment exercise reports of Finnish universities and the relevant international perspectives , 2014 .

[4]  V. Papava On the Theory of Post-Communist Economic Transition to Market , 2012 .

[5]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study , 2013, Scientometrics.

[6]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries , 2016, Scientometrics.

[7]  Emanuel Kulczycki,et al.  Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland , 2017 .

[8]  Gunnar Sivertsen,et al.  Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities , 2016, Scientometrics.

[9]  Emanuel Kulczycki,et al.  Publication Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities in Flanders and Poland , 2017, ISSI.

[10]  G. Sivertsen Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model , 2016 .

[11]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bias in peer review , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Tim C. E. Engels,et al.  Cognitive and Organizational Classification of Publications in the Social Sciences and Humanities , 2017, ISSI.

[13]  Emanuel Kulczycki,et al.  Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[14]  Tim C. E. Engels,et al.  The objectives, design and selection process of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW) , 2014 .

[16]  Bea Mahieu,et al.  International Audit of Research, Development & Innovation in the Czech Republic , 2011 .

[17]  Tim C. E. Engels,et al.  European databases and repositories for social sciences and humanities research output : report , 2017 .

[18]  Brigitte Tiefenthaler,et al.  Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding system , 2015 .

[19]  Birger Larsen,et al.  Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: an empirical analysis of the potential , 2011, Scientometrics.

[20]  Eric H. J. Spruyt,et al.  Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009 , 2012, Scientometrics.

[21]  Tim C. E. Engels,et al.  Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey , 2018, Research Evaluation.

[22]  Tim C. E. Engels,et al.  The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science—a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9) , 2012 .

[23]  M. Kwiek Structural changes in the Polish higher education system (1990–2010): a synthetic view , 2014 .

[24]  Katalin Balázs,et al.  Transformation of the Research Systems of Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe: An Introduction , 1995 .

[25]  Thed van Leeuwen The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible , 2006 .

[26]  Hanna-Mari Puuska,et al.  Scholarly Publishing Patterns in Finland - A comparison of disciplinary groups , 2014 .