Bistable State Switch Enables Ultrasensitive Feedback Control in Heterogeneous Microbial Populations

Molecular feedback control circuits can improve robustness of gene expression at the single cell-level. This achievement can be offset by requirements of rapid protein expression, that may induce cellular stress, known as burden, that reduces colony growth. To begin to address this challenge we take inspiration by ‘division-of-labor’ in heterogeneous cell populations: we propose to combine bistable switches and quorum sensing systems to coordinate gene expression at the population-level. We show that bistable switches in individual cells operating in parallel yield an ultrasensitive response, while cells maintain heterogeneous levels of gene expression to avoid burden across all cells. Within a feedback loop, these switches can achieve robust reference tracking and adaptation to disturbances at the population-level. We also demonstrate that molecular sequestration enables tunable hysteresis in individual switches, making it possible to obtain a wide range of stable population-level expressions.

[1]  R. Weiss,et al.  Programmed population control by cell–cell communication and regulated killing , 2004, Nature.

[2]  Sara Hooshangi,et al.  From unicellular properties to multicellular behavior: bacteria quorum sensing circuitry and applications. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[3]  A. Arkin,et al.  Sequestration-based bistability enables tuning of the switching boundaries and design of a latch , 2012, Molecular systems biology.

[4]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Molecular Titration Promotes Oscillations and Bistability in Minimal Network Models with Monomeric Regulators. , 2016, ACS synthetic biology.

[5]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering for biofuels: exploiting innate microbial capacity or importing biosynthetic potential? , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[6]  M. Lenzen,et al.  Scientists’ warning on affluence , 2020, Nature Communications.

[7]  Christian Cuba Samaniego,et al.  Ultrasensitive molecular controllers for quasi-integral feedback , 2018, bioRxiv.

[8]  Yoke Peng Leong,et al.  Hard Limits and Performance Tradeoffs in a Class of Antithetic Integral Feedback Networks. , 2019, Cell systems.

[9]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Resource Competition Shapes the Response of Genetic Circuits. , 2017, ACS synthetic biology.

[10]  J. Stelling,et al.  Robustness of Cellular Functions , 2004, Cell.

[11]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  Wael Sabra,et al.  Biosystems analysis and engineering of microbial consortia for industrial biotechnology , 2010 .

[13]  Griffin M. Weber,et al.  BioNumbers—the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  E. Winfree,et al.  Construction of an in vitro bistable circuit from synthetic transcriptional switches , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  Michael A. Fischbach,et al.  Synthetic Microbes As Drug Delivery Systems , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[16]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Realizing “integral control” in living cells: How to overcome leaky integration due to dilution? , 2017, bioRxiv.

[17]  Siddhartha Roy,et al.  Kinetics of Transcription Initiation at lacP1 , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Layered Feedback Control Improves Robust Functionality across Heterogeneous Cell Populations , 2020, bioRxiv.

[20]  S. West,et al.  Division of labour in microorganisms: an evolutionary perspective , 2016, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[21]  W. Lim,et al.  Defining Network Topologies that Can Achieve Biochemical Adaptation , 2009, Cell.

[22]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Protein sequestration generates a flexible ultrasensitive response in a genetic network , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[23]  D. Y. Zhang,et al.  Engineering Entropy-Driven Reactions and Networks Catalyzed by DNA , 2007, Science.

[24]  M. Khammash,et al.  A universal biomolecular integral feedback controller for robust perfect adaptation , 2019, Nature.

[25]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Synthetic circuit for exact adaptation and fold-change detection , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Control theory meets synthetic biology , 2016, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  Nikolaos Anesiadis,et al.  Engineering metabolism through dynamic control. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[28]  S. Leibler,et al.  Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch , 2004, Science.

[29]  S. Basu,et al.  A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation , 2005, Nature.

[30]  M. Andersen,et al.  Ultrasensitive response motifs: basic amplifiers in molecular signalling networks , 2013, Open Biology.

[31]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Population regulation in microbial consortia using dual feedback control , 2017, bioRxiv.

[32]  M. Charbonneau,et al.  Developing a new class of engineered live bacterial therapeutics to treat human diseases , 2020, Nature Communications.

[33]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  A Systems-Level Analysis of Perfect Adaptation in Yeast Osmoregulation , 2009, Cell.

[34]  M. Thattai,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in Fluctuating Environments , 2004, Genetics.

[35]  Christian Cuba Samaniego,et al.  An ultrasensitive biomolecular network for robust feedback control , 2017 .