Perception of biological motion in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): by females only

The ability to perceive biological motion (BM) has been demonstrated in a number of species including humans but the few studies of non-human primates have been relatively inconclusive. We investigated whether common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are able to perceive biological motion, using a novel method to test non-human primates. Marmosets (7 male and 7 female) were trained to remove a cover from a container and look inside it, revealing a computer screen. Then they were presented with images on this computer screen consisting of a novel BM pattern (a walking hen) and 4 manipulations of that pattern (a static frame of this pattern and inverted, scrambled, and rotating versions of the pattern). The behavioural responses of the marmosets were recorded and used to assess discrimination between stimuli. BM was attended to by females but not males, as shown by active inspection behaviour, mainly movement of the head towards the stimulus. Females paid significantly less attention to all of the other stimuli. This indicates the females’ ability to attend to biological motion. Females showed slightly more attention to the inverted BM than to the static, scrambled, and rotating patterns. The males were less attentive to all of the stimuli than were the females and, unlike the females, responded to all stimuli in a similar manner. This sex difference could be due to an inability of males to recognise BM altogether or to a lesser amount of curiosity. Considered together with the findings of previous studies on chicks and humans, the results of the present study support the notion of a common mechanism across species for the detection of BM.

[1]  Christian Graff,et al.  Four-Day-Old Human Neonates Look Longer at Non-Biological Motions of a Single Point-of-Light , 2007, PloS one.

[2]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks , 2006, Current Biology.

[3]  R. Blake Cats Perceive Biological Motion , 1993 .

[4]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Are Animals Autistic Savants? , 2008, PLoS biology.

[5]  G. Mather,et al.  Recognition of Animal Locomotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays , 1993, Perception.

[6]  N. Caine,et al.  Demonstration of a foraging advantage for trichromatic marmosets (Callithrix geoffroyi) dependent on food colour , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[8]  D R Proffitt,et al.  The development of infant sensitivity to biomechanical motions. , 1985, Child development.

[9]  S. Lea,et al.  Categorization of natural movements by pigeons: visual concept discrimination and biological motion. , 1998, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  Nikolaus F Troje,et al.  Reference Frames for Orientation Anisotropies in Face Recognition and Biological-Motion Perception , 2003, Perception.

[11]  M. Strube,et al.  RESEARCH ARTICLE Personality Traits in Captive Lion-Tailed Macaques (Macaca silenus) , 2005 .

[12]  J. Itani On the acquisition and propagation of a new food habit in the natural group of the Japanese monkey at Takasaki - Yama , 1958, Primates.

[13]  Masao Kawai,et al.  Newly-acquired pre-cultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima islet , 1965, Primates.

[14]  F. Simion,et al.  A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Perception of the symmetrical patterning of human gait by infants. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[16]  L. Rogers,et al.  Parental care in marmosets (Callithrix jacchus jacchus): Development and effect of anogenital licking on exploration. , 1999 .

[17]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns , 2005, PLoS biology.

[18]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Recognition of Point-Light Biological Motion Displays by Young Children , 2001, Perception.

[19]  D. Perrett,et al.  Responses of Anterior Superior Temporal Polysensory (STPa) Neurons to Biological Motion Stimuli , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  A. Mikami,et al.  Advantage of dichromats over trichromats in discrimination of color‐camouflaged stimuli in nonhuman primates , 2005, American journal of primatology.

[21]  C. Lazaro-Perea,et al.  Intergroup interactions in wild common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus: territorial defence and assessment of neighbours , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Response Toward Novel Foods and Novel Objects in Wild Cebus apella , 2003, International Journal of Primatology.

[23]  Annie S. Olinick,et al.  Global and local processing in adult humans (Homo sapiens), 5-year-old children (Homo sapiens), and adult cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[24]  M. E. Yamamoto,et al.  Sex differences in common Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) in response to an unfamiliar food task , 2004, Primates.

[25]  L. Rogers,et al.  Head-cocking as a form of exploration in the common marmoset and its development. , 2006, Developmental psychobiology.

[26]  P. Kappeler The acquisition process of a novel behavior pattern in a group of ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) , 1987, Primates.

[27]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[28]  A. Klin,et al.  Two-year-olds with autism orient to nonsocial contingencies rather than biological motion , 2009, Nature.

[29]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Perception of biomechanical motions by infants: implementation of various processing constraints. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  R. Fox,et al.  The perception of biological motion by human infants. , 1982, Science.

[31]  M. Brosnan,et al.  Gestalt processing in autism: failure to process perceptual relationships and the implications for contextual understanding. , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[32]  D. Scully Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 1987 .

[33]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[34]  Comparative study of visual perception using Johansson's stimuli , 1997 .

[35]  M. Tomonaga Visual Search for Biological Motion Patterns in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 2001 .

[36]  L. Regolin,et al.  Perception of the stereokinetic illusion by the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[37]  J. Bachevalier,et al.  Gender differences in visual habit formation in 3-month-old rhesus monkeys. , 1989, Developmental psychobiology.

[38]  Processing of biological motion point-light displays by baboons (Papio papio). , 2007 .