Repetition Probability Effects Depend on Prior Experiences

The magnitude of repetition suppression (RS) in the Fusiform Face Area is influenced by the probability of repetitions of faces (Summerfield et al., 2008), implying that perceptual expectations affect repetition-related processes. Surprisingly, however, macaque single-cell (Kaliukhovich and Vogels, 2011) and human fMRI (Kovács et al., 2013) studies have failed to find repetition probability [P(rep)] modulations of RS with nonface stimuli in the occipitotemporal cortex, suggesting that the effect is face specific. One possible explanation of this category selectivity is that the extensive experience humans have with faces affects the neural mechanisms of RS specifically, creating P(rep) modulatory effects. To address this question, we used fMRI to test the P(rep) effects for another well trained stimulus category, upright letters of the roman alphabet as well as for unfamiliar false fonts. We observed significant RS for both stimulus sets in the Letter Form Area as well as in the caudodorsal part of the lateral occipital complex. Interestingly, the influence of P(rep) on RS was dependent on the stimulus: while we observed P(rep) modulations for the roman letters, no such effects were found for the unfamiliar false fonts in either area. Our findings suggest that P(rep) effects on RS are manifest for nonface stimuli as well, but that they depend on the experience of the subjects with the stimulus category. This shows, for the first time, that prior experience affects the influence of contextual predictive information on RS in the human occipitotemporal cortex.

[1]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Activation of Fusiform Face Area by Greebles Is Related to Face Similarity but Not Expertise , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Developmental changes in category-specific brain responses to numbers and letters in a working memory task , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  R. Henson,et al.  Explaining away repetition effects via predictive coding , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[4]  T. Shallice,et al.  Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. , 2000, Science.

[5]  T. Hendler,et al.  A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  R N Henson,et al.  Repetition effects for words and nonwords as indexed by event-related fMRI: a preliminary study. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[9]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[11]  Michael J. Constantino,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008 .

[12]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Repetition priming and repetition suppression: A case for enhanced efficiency through neural synchronization , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[14]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[15]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[17]  D. Sharp,et al.  The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  R. Vogels,et al.  Repetition Probability Does Not Affect fMRI Repetition Suppression for Objects , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Roth,et al.  Premotor activations in response to visually presented single letters depend on the hand used to write: a study on left-handers , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Maximilian Riesenhuber,et al.  Individual Variability in Location Impacts Orthographic Selectivity in the “Visual Word Form Area” , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Christian J Fiebach,et al.  Neuronal Mechanisms of Repetition Priming in Occipitotemporal Cortex: Spatiotemporal Evidence from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electroencephalography , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Keenan,et al.  Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  The Processing of Visual Shape in the Cerebral Cortex of Human and Nonhuman Primates: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  R. Henson Neuroimaging studies of priming , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.

[30]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[31]  Jonas Larsson,et al.  fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation? , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  G. Hole Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[33]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Memory systems for structural and semantic knowledge of faces and buildings , 2006, Brain Research.

[35]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Targeting the functional properties of cortical neurons using fMR-adaptation , 2012, NeuroImage.

[36]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Attention to single letters activates left extrastriate cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  A. Todorović,et al.  Repetition Suppression and Expectation Suppression Are Dissociable in Time in Early Auditory Evoked Fields , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  The problem of functional localization in the human brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  A. Mack,et al.  What we see: Inattention and the capture of attention by meaning , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[42]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  B. Wandell,et al.  Differential sensitivity to words and shapes in ventral occipito-temporal cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  C. Price,et al.  Three Distinct Ventral Occipitotemporal Regions for Reading and Object Naming , 1999, NeuroImage.

[45]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Expertise with characters in alphabetic and nonalphabetic writing systems engage overlapping occipito-temporal areas , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[46]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Stimulus repetition probability effects on repetition suppression are position invariant for faces , 2012, NeuroImage.

[47]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus , 2002, Neuroreport.

[49]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects , 2009, Cognition.

[50]  Mingxia Zhang,et al.  The “visual word form area” is involved in successful memory encoding of both words and faces , 2010, NeuroImage.

[51]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.

[52]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  A critical review of the development of face recognition: Experience is less important than previously believed , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[53]  Orrin Devinsky,et al.  Sequential then Interactive Processing of Letters and Words in the Left Fusiform Gyrus , 2012, Nature Communications.

[54]  Olivia S. Cheung,et al.  Visual prediction and perceptual expertise. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[55]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  G. Kovács,et al.  Neural correlates of high-level adaptation-related aftereffects. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  C. Olson,et al.  Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[60]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[61]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The unique role of the visual word form area in reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. , 1999 .