Practical Systems for Personal Thermal Comfort

Conventional centralized HVAC systems cannot provide office workers with personalized thermal comfort because workers in a single zone share a common air handling unit and thus a single air temperature. Moreover, they heat or cool an entire zone even if a single worker is present, which can waste energy. Both drawbacks are addressed by Personal Environmental Control (PEC) systems that modify the thermal envelope around a worker’s body to provide personalized comfort. However, most PEC systems are both expensive and difficult to deploy, making them unsuitable for large-scale deployment. In contrast, we present two novel PEC systems: SPOTlight and its successor OpenTherm. These systems are carefully designed for practical, rapid, and scalable deployment. Intuitive web-based interfaces for user controls allow OpenTherm to be installed in only about 15 minutes, including user training. It is also low-cost (as low as US$80, in volume) because it uses the fewest possible sensors and a lightweight compute engine that can optionally be located in the cloud. In this thesis, we present the detailed design of SPOTlight and OpenTherm systems, and results from a cumulative 81 months of OpenTherm’s operation in 15 offices. In our objective evaluation, we find that OpenTherm improved user comfort by ∼67%. This is in comparison to when only the central HVAC system with no knowledge of occupancy and inability to control offices individually is used.

[1]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  Optimal Personal Comfort Management Using SPOT+ , 2013, BuildSys@SenSys.

[2]  Gail Brager,et al.  Air movement preferences observed in office buildings , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[3]  Alberto E. Cerpa,et al.  Energy efficient building environment control strategies using real-time occupancy measurements , 2009, BuildSys '09.

[4]  Kwang Ho Lee,et al.  Energy savings from extended air temperature setpoints and reductions in room air mixing - eScholarship , 2005 .

[5]  Y Zhu,et al.  Progress in thermal comfort research over the last twenty years. , 2013, Indoor air.

[6]  Rhys Goldstein,et al.  Real-time occupancy detection using decision trees with multiple sensor types , 2011, SpringSim.

[7]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[8]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Comfort, perceived air quality, and work performance in a low-power task–ambient conditioning system , 2008 .

[9]  Rayman Preet Singh,et al.  A cloud-based consumer-centric architecture for energy data analytics , 2013, e-Energy '13.

[10]  Ping Pan,et al.  Internet Engineering Task Force , 1995 .

[11]  Edward Arens,et al.  Draft or Breeze? Preferences for air movement in office buildings and schools from the ASHRAE database , 2009 .

[12]  Gail Brager,et al.  Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference , 1998 .

[13]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[14]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[15]  J. Toftum,et al.  Air movement--good or bad? , 2004, Indoor air.

[16]  Fred Bauman,et al.  Field study of the impact of a desktop task/ambient conditioning system in office buildings , 1998 .

[17]  Sevastianos Mirasgedis,et al.  Mitigating CO2 emissions from energy use in the world's buildings , 2007 .

[18]  Srinivasan Keshav,et al.  SPOT: a smart personalized office thermal control system , 2013, e-Energy '13.

[19]  Miguel Á. Carreira-Perpiñán,et al.  OBSERVE: Occupancy-based system for efficient reduction of HVAC energy , 2011, Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[20]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  Personalized HVAC control system , 2010, 2010 Internet of Things (IOT).

[21]  Tullie Circle,et al.  AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING AND AIR-CONDITIONING , 2013 .

[22]  S. Svendsen,et al.  Residential and commercial buildings , 2012 .