A two-phase growth strategy in cultured neuronal networks as reflected by the distribution of neurite branching angles.

Neurite outgrowth and branching patterns are instrumental in dictating the wiring diagram of developing neuronal networks. We study the self-organization of single cultured neurons into complex networks focusing on factors governing the branching of a neurite into its daughter branches. Neurite branching angles of insect ganglion neurons in vitro were comparatively measured in two neuronal categories: neurons in dense cultures that bifurcated under the presence of extrinsic (cellular environment) cues versus neurons in practical isolation that developed their neurites following predominantly intrinsic cues. Our experimental results were complemented by theoretical modeling and computer simulations. A preferred regime of branching angles was found in isolated neurons. A model based on biophysical constraints predicted a preferred bifurcation angle that was consistent with this range shown by our real neurons. In order to examine the origin of the preferred regime of angles we constructed simulations of neurite outgrowth in a developing network and compared the simulated developing neurons with our experimental results. We tested cost functions for neuronal growth that would be optimized at a specific regime of angles. Our results suggest two phases in the process of neuronal development. In the first, reflected by our isolated neurons, neurons are tuned to make first contact with a target cell as soon as possible, to minimize the time of growth. After contact is made, that is, after neuronal interconnections are formed, a second branching strategy is adopted, favoring higher efficiency in neurite length and volume. The two-phase development theory is discussed in relation to previous results.

[1]  R. Segev,et al.  Self-wiring of neural networks , 1997, cond-mat/9710352.

[2]  D. Bray,et al.  Mechanical tension produced by nerve cells in tissue culture. , 1979, Journal of cell science.

[3]  G. Ascoli,et al.  Quantitative morphometry of hippocampal pyramidal cells: Differences between anatomical classes and reconstructing laboratories , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  P. Whitington,et al.  Axon guidance factors in invertebrate development. , 1993, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[5]  Christopher Cherniak,et al.  Local optimization of neuron arbors , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  Amir Ayali,et al.  Morphological characterization of in vitro neuronal networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Dmitri B. Chklovskii,et al.  Wiring Optimization in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[8]  Amir Ayali,et al.  Growth morphology of two-dimensional insect neural networks , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[9]  Amir Harel,et al.  Biophysical Constraints on Neuronal Branching , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[10]  Brent A. Kauffman,et al.  In vivo dynamics of CNS sensory arbor formation: a time-lapse study in the embryonic leech. , 2003, Journal of neurobiology.

[11]  G. Edelman,et al.  Theoretical neuroanatomy and the connectivity of the cerebral cortex , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  D. Chklovskii,et al.  Power-law for axon diameters at branch point , 2003, BMC Neuroscience.

[13]  D A Turner,et al.  Morphometric and electrical properties of reconstructed hippocampal CA3 neurons recorded in vivo , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  A. B. Huber,et al.  Signaling at the growth cone: ligand-receptor complexes and the control of axon growth and guidance. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  K. Zinn,et al.  Neurobiology: Derailed axons get on track , 1999, Nature.

[16]  G. Mitchison Neuronal branching patterns and the economy of cortical wiring , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Jaap van Pelt,et al.  Branching rates and growth functions in the outgrowth of dendritic branching patterns , 2002, Network.

[18]  Jaap van Pelt,et al.  Branching rates and growth functions in the outgrowth of dendritic branching patterns. , 2002 .

[19]  Jaap van Pelt,et al.  Measures for quantifying dendritic arborizations , 2002, Network.

[20]  D A Turner,et al.  Dendritic properties of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in the rat: Intracellular staining in vivo and in vitro , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Connectivity and complexity: the relationship between neuroanatomy and brain dynamics , 2000, Neural Networks.

[22]  Amir Ayali,et al.  Self Organization of Two‐dimensional Insect Neural Networks , 2002 .

[23]  W. Rall Branching dendritic trees and motoneuron membrane resistivity. , 1959, Experimental neurology.

[24]  C. Goodman,et al.  The Molecular Biology of Axon Guidance , 1996, Science.

[25]  James Q. Zheng Turning of nerve growth cones induced by localized increases in intracellular calcium ions , 2000, Nature.

[26]  C. Cherniak,et al.  Large-scale optimization of neuron arbors. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[27]  M. Lohrum,et al.  Spatial Distributions of Guidance Molecules Regulate Chemorepulsion and Chemoattraction of Growth Cones , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  LETTERS TO NATURE , 1996 .

[29]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Communication in Neuronal Networks , 2003, Science.

[30]  T. Jessell,et al.  Axon guidance and the patterning of neuronal projections in vertebrates. , 1988, Science.

[31]  Kai Zinn,et al.  Regulated neurite tension as a mechanism for determination of neuronal arbor geometries in vivo , 1997, Current Biology.

[32]  Wade G Regehr,et al.  Neuronal firing: Does function follow form? , 1996, Current Biology.

[33]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  Measurements of growth cone adhesion to culture surfaces by micromanipulation , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.