On the influence of meteorological input on photochemical modelling of a severe episode over a coastal area

Abstract The modelling reconstruction of the processes determining the transport and mixing of ozone and its precursors in complex terrain areas is a challenging task, particularly when local-scale circulations, such as sea breeze, take place. Within this frame, the ESCOMPTE European campaign took place in the vicinity of Marseille (south-east of France) in summer 2001. The main objectives of the field campaign were to document several photochemical episodes, as well as to constitute a detailed database for chemistry transport models intercomparison. CAMx model has been applied on the largest intense observation periods (IOP) (June 21–26, 2001) in order to evaluate the impacts of two state-of-the-art meteorological models, RAMS and MM5, on chemical model outputs. The meteorological models have been used as best as possible in analysis mode, thus allowing to identify the spread arising in pollutant concentrations as an indication of the intrinsic uncertainty associated to the meteorological input. Simulations have been deeply investigated and compared with a considerable subset of observations both at ground level and along vertical profiles. The analysis has shown that both models were able to reproduce the main circulation features of the IOP. The strongest discrepancies are confined to the Planetary Boundary Layer, consisting of a clear tendency to underestimate or overestimate wind speed over the whole domain. The photochemical simulations showed that variability in circulation intensity was crucial mainly for the representation of the ozone peaks and of the shape of ozone plumes at the ground that have been affected in the same way over the whole domain and all along the simulated period. As a consequence, such differences can be thought of as a possible indicator for the uncertainty related to the definition of meteorological fields in a complex terrain area.

[1]  P. Drobinski,et al.  Impact of the Rhone and Durance valleys on sea-breeze Circulation in the Marseille Area , 2005 .

[2]  D. Carson,et al.  The development of a dry inversion‐capped convectively unstable boundary layer , 1973 .

[3]  E. Mantilla,et al.  Meteorology and photochemical air pollution in Southern Europe: Experimental results from EC research projects , 1996 .

[4]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Scaling the atmospheric boundary layer , 1986 .

[5]  C. Kottmeier,et al.  Mesoscale circulation systems and ozone concentrations during ESCOMPTE : a case study from IOP 2b , 2005 .

[6]  H. ApSimon,et al.  The influence of the photolysis rates on modelled ozone concentrations , 1998 .

[7]  P. Thunis,et al.  Effects of uncertainties in meteorological inputs on urban airshed model predictions and ozone control strategies , 1996 .

[8]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  A Simple Scheme for Daytime Estimates of the Surface Fluxes from Routine Weather Data , 1983 .

[9]  I. Troen,et al.  A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation , 1986 .

[10]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Coupled Atmosphere–Biophysics–Hydrology Models for Environmental Modeling , 2000 .

[11]  Isabelle Coll,et al.  Impact of meteorological data resolution on the forecasted ozone concentrations during the ESCOMPTE IOP2a and IOP2b , 2005 .

[12]  R. A. Helvey,et al.  Ozone transport by mesoscale and diurnal wind circulations across southern California , 2003 .

[13]  G. Ancellet,et al.  Observed and modelled “chemical weather” during ESCOMPTE , 2005 .

[14]  J. Dudhia A Nonhydrostatic Version of the Penn State–NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation Tests and Simulation of an Atlantic Cyclone and Cold Front , 1993 .

[15]  H. Chepfer,et al.  The Ability of MM5 to Simulate Ice Clouds: Systematic Comparison between Simulated and Measured Fluxes and Lidar/Radar Profiles at the SIRTA Atmospheric Observatory , 2006 .

[16]  Naresh Kumar,et al.  Comparing prognostic and diagnostic meteorological fields and their impacts on photochemical air quality modeling , 1996 .

[17]  Henri Wortham,et al.  The ESCOMPTE program: an overview , 2004 .

[18]  Analysis and validation of ozone variability observed by lidar during the ESCOMPTE-2001 campaign , 2005 .

[19]  Wanshan Cheng Ozone distribution in coastal central Taiwan under sea-breeze conditions , 2002 .

[20]  Gunilla Svensson,et al.  Model simulations of the air quality in Athens, Greece, during the MEDCAPHOT-TRACE campaign , 1998 .

[21]  P. Tulet,et al.  Interaction between local and regional pollution during Escompte 2001: impact on surface ozone concentrations (IOP2a and 2b) , 2005 .

[22]  V. Matveev,et al.  Recirculation of polluted air masses over the East Mediterranean coast , 1997 .

[23]  Robert Vautard,et al.  A comparison of simulated and observed ozone mixing ratios for the summer of 1998 in Western Europe , 2001 .

[24]  R. Pielke,et al.  A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS , 1992 .

[25]  William R. Stockwell,et al.  First-order sensitivity analysis of models with time-dependent parameters: an application to PAN and ozone , 1999 .

[26]  J. W. Drummond,et al.  Observational evidence for the impact of the lake breeze circulation on ozone concentrations in Southern Ontario , 1999 .

[27]  Norbert Kalthoff,et al.  Regional transport and dilution during high pollution episodes in southeastern France: Summary of findings from the ESCOMPTE experiment , 2007 .

[28]  Zifa Wang,et al.  A modeling of the sea breeze and its impacts on ozone distribution in northern Taiwan , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..