I read with interest the article regarding temporal artery biopsy but would ask the authors to clarify how performing a temporal artery biopsy altered the management of those with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA). The diagnosis of GCA is a clinical diagnosis with a positive biopsy result contributing to this. As stated, the American College of Rheumatology score is a validated scoring system with 93.5% sensitivity and 91.2% specificity. If your positive biopsy specimens already scored 3 or greater on the ACR, then they need not have been carried out in the first place with a diagnosis of GCA already being made. I agree wholeheartedly that clinical acumen in selecting those where temporal artery biopsy will alter a patient’s management is imperative.
[1]
F. Hızlı,et al.
Penile Metastasis from Other Malignancies
,
2006,
Urologia Internationalis.
[2]
F. Haddad,et al.
Involvement of the penis by rectocolic adenocarcinoma
,
1987,
Diseases of the colon and rectum.
[3]
B. I. Rees.
Secondary involvement of the penis by rectal cancer
,
1975,
The British journal of surgery.
[4]
F. Hızlı,et al.
Penile metastasis from other malignancies. A study of ten cases and review of the literature.
,
2006,
Urologia internationalis.
[5]
F. Haddad,et al.
Involvement of the penis by rectocolic adenocarcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature
,
1987
.