Controllability analysis of multi objective control systems

The performance requirements stated in project specifications often comprise conflicting objectives. These objectives may further be a complex mix of steady state and dynamic performance. Control devices such as solenoid actuators are often chosen purely on steady state force characteristics, due to the difficulty of appraising the conflicting and generally non-linear nature of the performance objectives. This can have ramifications in terms not only of the actuator performance, but also in the overall controllability of the system when closed-loop control is implemented. An example automotive application examining the multi objective controllability of electronically actuated valves is presented. Multi objective evolutionary techniques are utilised to derive the optimal force-displacement characteristics and also dynamic characteristics of the desired actuator under the constraint of design performance criteria. The selected actuator is then assessed for its controllability and dynamic performance.

[1]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  On-line evolution of robust control systems: an industrial active magnetic bearing application , 2001 .

[2]  Henk Nijmeijer,et al.  Controllability distributions for nonlinear control systems , 1982 .

[3]  Matthew N. O. Sadiku,et al.  Elements of Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[4]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms. I. A unified formulation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[5]  A. Schaft Observability and Controllability for Smooth Nonlinear Systems , 1982 .

[6]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Multiobjective gas turbine engine controller design using genetic algorithms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[7]  A. Krener,et al.  Nonlinear controllability and observability , 1977 .

[8]  Ian Griffin,et al.  Multi-objective optimization approach to the ALSTOM gasifier problem , 2000 .

[9]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[10]  James E. Baker,et al.  Reducing Bias and Inefficienry in the Selection Algorithm , 1987, ICGA.

[11]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: FormulationDiscussion and Generalization , 1993, ICGA.

[12]  S. Hoole Computer-aided analysis and design of electromagnetic devices , 1989 .

[13]  J. Simkin,et al.  Optimization problems in electromagnetics , 1991 .

[14]  Claude Marchand,et al.  Using genetic algorithm for the optimization of electromagnetic devices , 1998 .