Who will be smart home users? An analysis of adoption and diffusion of smart homes

A smart home is considered a primary service of the Internet of Things (IoT), and global leading companies are launching smart home services/products based on the IoT. However, the spread of smart homes has been slower than expected, and analysis of smart homes from a demand perspective is required. This study suggests implications for promoting the smart home market by analyzing factors affecting adoption and diffusion of smart homes. A technology acceptance model was used to describe the adoption of smart homes and a multivariate probit model was used to describe the diffusion of smart homes. The characteristics of smart homes such as network effects between services/products and the importance of personal information protection were considered in addition to demographic variables. The results of this study show that compatibility, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness have significant positive effects on purchase intention. In terms of purchase timing, unlike other information and communication technology (ICT) services/products, older consumers are more likely to purchase smart homes within a given time period than are younger consumers. Therefore, a strategy for promoting smart home purchases by young consumers is required to increase market demand.

[1]  Abdul Rahman Ramli,et al.  Development of an embedded smart home management scheme , 2013 .

[2]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  A Theoretical Model of Consumer Acceptance of mPayment , 2006, AMCIS.

[3]  Ivan Flechais,et al.  Researching Privacy in Smart Homes: A Roadmap of Future Directions and Research Methods , 2018 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[5]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Smart Home: Cognitive Interactive People-Centric Internet of Things , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Juan Sánchez-Fernández,et al.  Role of gender on acceptance of mobile payment , 2014, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[7]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Multiple Response Data , 2003 .

[8]  K. Yap,et al.  Offline and online banking – where to draw the line when building trust in e‐banking? , 2010 .

[9]  Manseok Jo,et al.  Market Strategy for Promoting Green Consumption: Consumer Preference and Policy Implications for Laundry Detergent , 2017 .

[10]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity , 1998 .

[11]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Portrait of an Online Shopper: Understanding and Predicting Consumer Behavior , 2015, WSDM.

[12]  Munkee Choi,et al.  User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value , 2016, Telematics Informatics.

[13]  Nicoletta Corrocher,et al.  The adoption of Web 2.0 services: An empirical investigation , 2011 .

[14]  Daeho Lee,et al.  Strategic management of over-the-top services: Focusing on Korean consumer adoption behavior , 2016 .

[15]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Jeongil Choi,et al.  Estimation of Willingness to Pay for Smart Home Service by Contingent Valuation Method , 2016 .

[17]  M. J. Kraemer,et al.  Researching Privacy in Smart Homes: A Roadmap of Future Research Directions and Research Methods , 2018, IoT 2018.

[18]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[19]  Ling Zhihao,et al.  The research and implement of smart home system based on Internet of Things , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC).

[20]  Chanmi G. Hwang,et al.  Consumers' acceptance of wearable technology: Examining solar-powered clothing , 2014 .

[21]  K. Train.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[22]  Jianjun Yu,et al.  Research and Application on the Smart Home Based on Component Technologies and Internet of Things , 2011 .

[23]  M. Peterson,et al.  Understanding the Attitude-Behavior Gap for Renewable Energy Systems Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory , 2013 .

[24]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[25]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[26]  R. LaPiere.  Attitudes vs Actions. 1934. , 1934, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  Jongsu Lee,et al.  Strategic Management of Cloud Computing Services: Focusing on Consumer Adoption Behavior , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[28]  K. Train,et al.  On the Similarity of Classical and Bayesian Estimates of Individual Mean Partworths , 2000 .

[29]  Chung-Horng Lung,et al.  Smart Home: Integrating Internet of Things with Web Services and Cloud Computing , 2013, 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science.

[30]  Shumaila Y. Yousafzai,et al.  Explaining Internet Banking Behavior: Theory of Reasoned Action, Theory of Planned Behavior, or Technology Acceptance Model? , 2010 .

[31]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany , 2016 .

[32]  Jihoon Hong,et al.  Strategic management of next-generation connected life: Focusing on smart key and car–home connectivity , 2016 .

[33]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  Which smart electricity service contracts will consumers accept? The demand for compensation in a platform market , 2018 .

[34]  Kire Trivodaliev,et al.  A review of Internet of Things for smart home: Challenges and solutions , 2017 .

[35]  Shruti Gupta,et al.  THE ATTITUDE - BEHAVIOR GAP IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUMERISM , 2006 .

[36]  Eunil Park,et al.  Smart home services as the next mainstream of the ICT industry: determinants of the adoption of smart home services , 2018, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[37]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  Moderating Roles of User Demographics in the American Customer Satisfaction Model within the Context of Mobile Services , 2006, AMCIS.

[39]  Daniel Díaz Sánchez,et al.  Major requirements for building Smart Homes in Smart Cities based on Internet of Things technologies , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[40]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[41]  Jing Liang,et al.  Design and implementation of a new smart home control system based on internet of things , 2017, 2017 International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2).

[42]  Shan-shan Chung,et al.  The Value-Action Gap in Waste Recycling: The Case of Undergraduates in Hong Kong , 2007, Environmental management.

[43]  David C. Yen,et al.  The acceptance and diffusion of the innovative smart phone use: A case study of a delivery service company in logistics , 2009, Inf. Manag..