Inverse kinematics for a redundant robotic manipulator used for nuclear decommissioning

The article develops a generic framework for the control of a dual-manipulator mobile robotic system for nuclear decommissioning, with a particular focus on the inverse kinematics and trajectory planning. A six Degrees-Of-Freedom (DOF) kinematic model for each manipulator is described, including the rotation of the end-effector. On this basis, the forward kinematic equations are relatively straightforward to determine. However, the redundant nature of the manipulator and its particular geometry exclude the possibility of a closed-form analytic solution to the inverse kinematics. Hence, previous studies into advanced automatic control using the device have locked off selected control valves. For example, recent research into nonlinear, state-dependent control systems for the hydraulic actuators have been limited to just three DOF. By contrast, this new study considers all the joints of each manipulator, basing the resolution of the inverse kinematics on the iterative Jacobian transpose method. Preliminary experimental and simulation results highlight the potential utility of the system by performing standard tasks such as pick and place operations.

[1]  Jadran Lenarčič,et al.  Advances in Robot Kinematics: Analysis and Control , 1998 .

[2]  Seyed Mahdi Hashemi,et al.  Low-complexity linear parameter-varying modeling and control of a robotic manipulator , 2012 .

[3]  Dmitry Berenson,et al.  Humanoid motion planning for dual-arm manipulation and re-grasping tasks , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Richard Bloss How do you decommission a nuclear installation? Call in the robots , 2010, Ind. Robot.

[5]  C. J. Taylor,et al.  State-dependent control of a hydraulically-actuated nuclear decommissioning robot , 2012, Proceedings of 2012 UKACC International Conference on Control.

[6]  Tamim Asfour,et al.  Integrated Grasp and motion planning , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Bartlomiej Stanczyk,et al.  Development of a telerobotic system for exploration of hazardous environments , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[8]  S. Buss Introduction to Inverse Kinematics with Jacobian Transpose , Pseudoinverse and Damped Least Squares methods , 2004 .

[9]  Takao Nishiumi,et al.  Hydraulic Control Systems: Theory And Practice , 2016 .

[10]  Jean-Marie Aerts,et al.  Control of Nonlinear Biological Systems by Non-minimal State Variable Feedback , 2014 .

[11]  C. James Taylor,et al.  Control of a dual-arm robotic manipulator , 2010 .

[12]  Nariman Sepehri,et al.  Generalized predictive control of a robotic manipulator with hydraulic actuators , 1992, Robotica.

[13]  E. M. Shaban,et al.  Development of an automated verticality alignment system for a vibro-lance , 2008 .

[14]  Peter C. Young,et al.  True Digital Control: Statistical Modelling and Non-Minimal State Space Design , 2013 .

[15]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Nonlinear control of hydraulic robots , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  Robert Bogue,et al.  Robots in the nuclear industry: a review of technologies and applications , 2011, Ind. Robot.

[17]  Cheng Guan,et al.  Nonlinear Adaptive Robust Control of Single-Rod Electro-Hydraulic Actuator With Unknown Nonlinear Parameters , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[18]  Keith J. Burnham,et al.  Controllable forms for stabilising pole assignment design of generalised bilinear systems , 2011 .

[19]  Diego J. Pedregal,et al.  Environmental time series analysis and forecasting with the Captain toolbox , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  Bin Yao,et al.  Indirect Adaptive Robust Control of Hydraulic Manipulators With Accurate Parameter Estimates , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[21]  Derek W. Seward,et al.  Development of a Multi-Arm Mobile Robot for Nuclear Decommissioning Tasks , 2007 .