Invasion of pollination networks on oceanic islands: importance of invader complexes and endemic super generalists

Abstract. The structure of pollination networks is described for two oceanic islands, the Azorean Flores and the Mauritian Ile aux Aigrettes. At each island site, all interactions between endemic, non‐endemic native and introduced plants and pollinators were mapped. Linkage level, i.e. number of species interactions per species, was significantly higher for endemic species than for non‐endemic native and introduced species. Linkage levels of the two latter categories were similar. Nine types of interaction may be recognized among endemic, non‐endemic native and introduced plants and pollinators. Similar types had similar frequencies in the two networks. Specifically, we looked for the presence of ‘invader complexes’ of mutualists, defined as groups of introduced species interacting more with each other than expected by chance and thus facilitating each other’s establishment. On both islands, observed frequencies of interactions between native (endemic and non‐endemic) and introduced pollinators and plants differed from random. Introduced pollinators and plants interacted less than expected by chance. Thus, the data did not support the existence of invader complexes. Instead, our study suggested that endemic super‐generalist species, i.e. pollinators or plant species with a very wide pollination niche, include new invaders in their set of food plants or pollinators and thereby improve establishment success of the invaders. Reviewing other studies, super generalists seem to be a widespread island phenomenon, i.e. island pollination networks include one or a few species with a very high generalization level compared to co‐occurring species. Low density of island species may lead to low interspecific competition, high abundance and ultimately wide niches and super generalization.

[1]  R. Frey Tiergeographische Studien über die Dipteren-Fauna der Azoren. I. Verzeichnis der bisher von der Azoren bekannten Dipteren , 1945 .

[2]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[3]  D. L. Angelis,et al.  STABILITY AND CONNECTANCE IN FOOD WEB MODELS , 1975 .

[4]  J. Olesen The Macaronesian bird-flower element and its relation to bird and bee opportunists , 1985 .

[5]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Flowering and seasonal changes in flower sex ratio and frequency of flower visitors in a population of Saxifraga hirculus , 1989 .

[7]  P. M. Davis,et al.  The Butterflies of Mauritius , 1993, The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera.

[8]  J. Olesen,et al.  Mauritian red nectar remains a mystery , 1998, Nature.

[9]  B. G. Baldwin,et al.  Switch from specialized to generalized pollination , 1998, Nature.

[10]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  The structure of a high latitude plant‐flower visitor system: the dominance of flies , 1999 .

[11]  J Memmott,et al.  The structure of a plant-pollinator food web. , 1999, Ecology letters.

[12]  Steiner,et al.  Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  M Rejmánek,et al.  Plant invasions — the role of mutualisms , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  J. Olesen,et al.  Insular interactions between lizards and flowers: flower visitation by an endemic Mauritian gecko , 2001, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[15]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS IN PLANT–POLLINATOR MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS , 2002 .

[16]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown? , 1999, Biological Invasions.