Sensorimotor adaptation of speech I: Compensation and adaptation.

When motor actions (e.g., reaching with your hand) adapt to altered sensory feedback (e.g., viewing a shifted image of your hand through a prism), the phenomenon is called sensorimotor adaptation (SA). In the study reported here, SA was observed in speech. In two 2-hour experiments (adaptation and control), participants whispered a variety of CVC words. For those words containing the vowel /E/, participants heard auditory feedback of their whispering. A DSP-based vocoder processed the participants' auditory feedback in real time, allowing the formant frequencies of participants' auditory speech feedback to be shifted. In the adaptation experiment, formants were shifted along one edge of the vowel triangle. For half the participants, formants were shifted so participants heard /a/ when they produced /E/; for the other half, the shift made participants hear /i/ when they produced /E/. During the adaptation experiment, participants altered their production of /E/ to compensate for the altered feedback, and these production changes were retained when participants whispered with auditory feedback blocked by masking noise. In a control experiment, in which the formants were not shifted, participants' production changes were small and inconsistent. Participants exhibited a range of adaptations in response to the altered feedback, with some participants adapting almost completely, and other participants showing very little or no adaptation.

[1]  J. P. Southall Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics, Translated from the Third German Edition. Vol. I , 1925 .

[2]  Bernard S. Lee Some Effects of Side‐Tone Delay , 1950 .

[3]  G. Fairbanks,et al.  Systematic research in experimental phonetics. I. A theory of the speech mechanism as a servosystem. , 1954, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[4]  R. Held,et al.  Adaptation of Disarranged Hand-Eye Coordination Contingent upon Re-Afferent Stimulation , 1958 .

[5]  R. Held,et al.  A Neural Model for Labile Sensorimotor Coordinations , 1962 .

[6]  A. J. Yates Delayed Auditory Feedback , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  H. Lane,et al.  The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech , 1971 .

[8]  C. Smith,et al.  Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  Thomas G. Giolas,et al.  Auditory management of hearing-impaired children : principles and prerequisites for intervention , 1978 .

[10]  R. Welch Perceptual Modification: Adapting to Altered Sensory Environments , 1978 .

[11]  Norman J. Lass,et al.  Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice , 1979 .

[12]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  W. Cooper Speech Perception and Production: Studies in Selective Adaptation , 1979 .

[14]  Lawrence J. Raphael,et al.  Speech Science Primer: Physiology, Acoustics, and Perception of Speech , 1980 .

[15]  H Levitt,et al.  The structure of segmental errors in the speech of deaf children. , 1980, Journal of communication disorders.

[16]  J. Elman Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Speech Production Characteristics of the Hearing Impaired , 1982 .

[18]  M. E. Lutman,et al.  Hearing science and hearing disorders , 1983 .

[19]  Ellen Douglas-Cowie,et al.  Speech production in profound postlingual deafness. , 1983 .

[20]  K. Kallail,et al.  Formant-frequency differences between isolated whispered and phonated vowel samples produced by adult female subjects. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[23]  Douglas D. O'Shaughnessy,et al.  Speech communication : human and machine , 1987 .

[24]  D K Oller,et al.  The role of audition in infant babbling. , 1988, Child development.

[25]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Vowel duration and voice onset time for stressed and nonstressed syllables in stutterers under delayed auditory feedback condition. , 1989, Folia phoniatrica.

[26]  H. Lane,et al.  Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Forward Models: Supervised Learning with a Distal Teacher , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Transformed auditory feedback: Effects of fundamental frequency perturbation , 1993 .

[29]  P. Monoson Speech Science Primer: Physiology, Acoustics, and Perception of Speech (3rd ed.) , 1994 .

[30]  V. Gracco,et al.  Articulatory changes following spectral and temporal modifications in auditory feedback , 1994 .

[31]  Ingo R. Titze,et al.  Principles of voice production , 1994 .

[32]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit memory: A new frontier for cognitive neuroscience , 1995 .

[34]  Eugene E. Bernard,et al.  Biological Prototypes and Synthetic Systems , 1995 .

[35]  René Carré,et al.  Vowel-consonant-vowel modeling bysuperposition of consonant closure on vowel-to-vowel gestures , 1995 .

[36]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[37]  M L Matthies,et al.  Acoustic and articulatory measures of sibilant production with and without auditory feedback from a cochlear implant. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[38]  J Wozniak,et al.  Changes in sound pressure and fundamental frequency contours following changes in hearing status. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  C. Larson,et al.  Cross-modality influences in speech motor control: the use of pitch shifting for the study of F0 control. , 1998, Journal of communication disorders.

[40]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. , 1998, Science.

[41]  C. Larson,et al.  Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  J. Laver,et al.  The handbook of phonetic sciences , 1999 .

[43]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Coarticulation • Suprasegmentals,et al.  Acoustic Phonetics , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.