Psychosocial issues in space: future challenges.

As the duration of space flights increases and crews become more heterogeneous, psychosocial factors are likely to play an increasingly important role in determining mission success. The operations of the International Space Station and planning of interplanetary missions represent important future challenges for how to select, train and monitor crews. So far, empirical evidence about psychological factors in space is based on simulations and personnel in analog environments (i.e. polar expeditions, submarines). It is apparent that attempts to transfer from these environments to space requires a thorough analysis of the human behavior specific to the fields. Recommendations for research include the effects of multi-nationality on crew interaction, development of tension within crews and between Mission Control, and prediction of critical phases in adaptation over time. Selection of interpersonally compatible crews, pre-mission team training and implementation of tools for self-monitoring of psychological parameters ensure that changes in mission requirements maximize crew performance.

[1]  N Kanas,et al.  Psychosocial support for cosmonauts. , 1991, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  V. Gushin,et al.  Chapter 2 Soviet Psychophysiological Investigations Of Simulated Isolation: Some Results And Prospects , 1993 .

[3]  Y A Clearwater,et al.  The human experience in Antarctica: applications to life in space. , 1989, Behavioral science.

[4]  菊池 長徳 Biobehavioral self-regulation : Eastern and Western perspectives , 1995 .

[5]  R. Helmreich,et al.  Culture at Work in Aviation and Medicine: National, Organizational and Professional Influences , 1998 .

[6]  R. Helmreich Culture and error in space: implications from analog environments. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  N Kanas,et al.  Interpersonal and cultural issues involving crews and ground personnel during Shuttle/Mir space missions. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  R. Vaernes EXEMSI: description of facilities, organization, crew selection, and operational aspects. Experimental Campaign for the European Manned Space Infrastructure. , 1996, Advances in space biology and medicine.

[9]  NationalResearchCouncil,et al.  A Strategy for Research in Space Biology and Medicine in the New Century , 1998 .

[10]  Ragnar J. Værnes,et al.  Chapter 2 Exemsi: Description of Facilities, Organization, Crew Selection, and Operational Aspects , 1996 .

[11]  D Manzey,et al.  Psychological countermeasures for extended manned spaceflights. , 1995, Acta astronautica.

[12]  V. A. Efimov,et al.  Chapter 16 Psychological Evaluation and Support During Exemsi , 1996 .

[13]  N Kanas,et al.  Content analysis of the crew communication with external communicants under prolonged isolation. , 1997, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  N Kanas,et al.  Crewmember interactions during a Mir space station simulation. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[15]  G M Sandal Crew Tension during a Space Station Simulation , 2001, Environment and behavior.

[16]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A Theory of Sentence Memory as Part of A General Theory of Memory , 2001 .

[17]  H Ursin,et al.  Psychological reactions during polar expeditions and isolation in hyperbaric chambers. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  A W Holland,et al.  Operational psychology countermeasures during the Lunar-Mars Life Support Test Project. , 1998, Life support & biosphere science : international journal of earth space.

[19]  H C Foushee,et al.  Organization, selection, and training of crews for extended spaceflight: findings from analogs and implications. , 1990, Journal of spacecraft and rockets.

[20]  J. Hunter,et al.  Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance , 1984 .

[21]  L A Palinkas,et al.  Behavior and performance on long-duration spaceflights: evidence from analogue environments. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[22]  H Ursin,et al.  Interpersonal relations during simulated space missions. , 1995, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[23]  L A Palinkas,et al.  Summary of research issues in behavior and performance in isolated and confined extreme (ICE) environments. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[24]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Comprehending anaphoric metaphors , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[25]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Verification of Sentences Containing Anaphoric Metaphors: An ACT-R Computational Model , 2003 .

[26]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Pilot personality and crew coordination: implications for training and selection. , 1991, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[27]  S F Kholin,et al.  Soviet psychophysiological investigations of simulated isolation: some results and prospects. , 1993, Advances in space biology and medicine.

[28]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Predicting astronaut effectiveness: a multivariate approach. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[29]  G M Sandal,et al.  Coping in Antarctica: is it possible to generalize results across settings? , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.