The word hinoki or ‘cypress’ can be transcribed in two variant forms, 檜 (the so-called “traditional” variant) and 桧 (the “simplified” variant), in Japanese kanji. Such variant forms are called kanji variants. The present paper reviews a series of studies on Japanese kanji recognition (Yokoyama, 2006a, 2006b, 2006c), and proposes a model which accounts for performance in a preference judgment task based on kanji frequency data. Yokoyama (2006a) administers preference judgment task in which the participants were presented with 263 pairs of traditional and simplified variants and asked to choose the more preferable variant of each pair. The analyses indicate a positive contribution of frequency to variant preferences, supporting the so-called “mere exposure effect” theory of Zajonc (1968). This finding leads to a logistic regression model that describes preference behavior in kanji recognition, based on Fechner’s law. Yokoyama (2006b) shows that the model is comparable to the so-called “the generalized matching law” of Baum (1974) and to “the ideal free distribution theory” of Fagen (1987). Yokoyama (2006c) further examines the predictive validity of the model with empirical data obtained from a preference judgment task, administered in the Tokyo and Kyoto areas. Logistic regression analyses are performed with the ratio of preference for the given variants and the logit of the character frequencies, yielding significant correlations between the predicted probabilities and the observed responses (r = .804 for Asahi newspaper data). The present paper synthesizes these studies and proposes a logistic regression model that efficiently describes preference behavior in Japanese kanji recognition, integrating the theoretical perspectives of mere exposure effect and the generalized matching law.
[1]
B. Monin.
The warm glow heuristic: when liking leads to familiarity.
,
2003,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[2]
Ronald Wardhaugh.
An introduction to sociolinguistics
,
1988
.
[3]
N. Chikamatsu,et al.
A Japanese logographic character frequency list for cognitive science research
,
2000,
Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[4]
R. Elliott,et al.
Neural Response during Preference and Memory Judgments for Subliminally Presented Stimuli: A Functional Neuroimaging Study
,
1998,
The Journal of Neuroscience.
[5]
R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.
Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.
,
1961,
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[6]
R. Zajonc.
Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.
,
1968
.
[7]
K. Matsuda.
Dissecting analogical leveling quantitatively: The case of the innovative potential suffix in Tôkyô Japanese
,
1993,
Language Variation and Change.
[8]
R. Fagen,et al.
A generalized habitat matching rule
,
2005,
Evolutionary Ecology.
[9]
W M Baum,et al.
On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.
,
1974,
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[10]
R. Zajonc,et al.
Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.
,
1980,
Science.