Locating Existing Best Management Practices Within a Watershed: The Value of Multiple Methods

There is an increasing need to document the impacts of conservation-related best management practices (BMPs) on water quality within a watershed. However, this impact analysis depends upon accurate geospatial locations of existing practices, which are difficult to obtain. This study demonstrates and evaluates three different methods for obtaining geospatial information for BMPs. This study was focused on the Eagle Creek Watershed, a mixed use watershed in central Indiana. We obtained geospatial information for BMPs through government records, producer interviews, and remote-sensing aerial photo interpretation. Aerial photos were also used to validate the government records and producer interviews. This study shows the variation in results obtained from the three sources of information as well as the benefits and drawbacks of each method. Using only one method for obtaining BMP information can be incomplete, and this study demonstrates how multiple methods can be used for the most accurate picture.

[1]  Mark D. Tomer,et al.  Assessment of the Iowa River's South Fork watershed: Part 2. Conservation practices , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[2]  Jae-Pil Cho,et al.  Water quality effects of simulated conservation practice scenarios in the Little River Experimental watershed , 2010, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[3]  Joseph R. Makuch,et al.  The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[4]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Effectiveness of best management practices in improving water quality in a pasture-dominated watershed , 2010, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[5]  MiSeon Lee,et al.  Evaluation of non-point source pollution reduction by applying best management practices using a SWAT model and QuickBird high resolution satellite imagery. , 2010, Journal of environmental sciences.

[6]  John Lyons,et al.  EFFECTS OF WATERSHED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON HABITAT AND FISH IN WISCONSIN STREAMS 1 , 2002 .

[7]  Adam Reimer,et al.  The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: implications for conservation adoption , 2012 .

[8]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  Conservation practices and gully erosion contributions in the Topashaw Canal watershed , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[9]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Small Watershed Monitoring Designs: A Report from the Chesapeake Bay Program Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee , 2010 .

[10]  Martin Volk,et al.  Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to predict the impact of alternative management practices on water quality and quantity , 2009 .

[11]  Zachary M Easton,et al.  Modeling watershed-scale effectiveness of agricultural best management practices to reduce phosphorus loading. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Adam Reimer,et al.  Equine Farm Operators: An Underserved Target Audience for Conservation Practice Outreach? , 2011 .

[13]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  An overview of recent remote sensing and GIS based research in ecological informatics , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[14]  Ray B. Bryant,et al.  Cannonsville Reservoir and Town Brook watersheds: Documenting conservation efforts to protect New York City's drinking water , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[15]  Andrea Armstrong,et al.  Adoption of the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program in the New York City watershed: The role of farmer attitudes , 2011, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[16]  Saied Mostaghimi,et al.  Development of survey-like assessment tools to assess agricultural best management practice performance potential , 2005 .

[17]  Chad B. Godsey,et al.  The adoption of conservation tillage practices in Oklahoma: Findings from a producer survey , 2011, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[18]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Impacts of land-use change and best management practice implementation in a Conservation Effects Assessment Project watershed: Northwest Arkansas , 2010, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[19]  J. Harbor.  A Practical Method for Estimating the Impact of Land-Use Change on Surface Runoff, Groundwater Recharge and Wetland Hydrology , 1994 .

[20]  Adam Reimer,et al.  The influence of perceptions of practice characteristics: An examination of agricultural best management practice adoption in two Indiana watersheds , 2012 .

[21]  G H Huang,et al.  Barriers to sustainable water-quality management. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  Anthony Vodacek,et al.  The Impact of Agricultural Best Management Practices on Downstream Systems: Soil Loss and Nutrient Chemistry and Flux to Conesus Lake, New York, USA , 2009 .

[23]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices , 2007 .

[24]  M. Halling,et al.  Measuring conservation program best management practice implementation and maintenance at the watershed scale , 2010, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[25]  Perry E. Cabot,et al.  Disproportionality as a Framework for Linking Social and Biophysical Systems , 2006 .

[26]  J. Boll,et al.  Determinants of the adoption of conservation practices by farmers in the Northwest Wheat and Range Region , 2010, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[27]  Mark D. Abkowitz,et al.  Watershed Modeling and its Applications: A State-of-the-Art Review , 2011 .

[28]  A. R. Dedrick,et al.  The length we go: Measuring environmental benefits of conservation practices , 2004 .

[29]  Jim Monke and Renée Johnson,et al.  Actual Farm Bill Spending and Cost Estimates , 2010 .