Osteogenic lineage restriction by osteoprogenitors cultured on nanometric grooved surfaces: The role of focal adhesion maturation

The differentiation of progenitor cells is dependent on more than biochemical signalling. Topographical cues in natural bone extracellular matrix guide cellular differentiation through the formation of focal adhesions, contact guidance, cytoskeletal rearrangement and ultimately gene expression. Osteoarthritis and a number of bone disorders present as growing challenges for our society. Hence, there is a need for next generation implantable devices to substitute for, or guide, bone repair in vivo. Cellular responses to nanometric topographical cues need to be better understood in vitro in order to ensure the effective and efficient integration and performance of these orthopedic devices. In this study, the FDA-approved plastic polycaprolactone was embossed with nanometric grooves and the response of primary and immortalized osteoprogenitor cells observed. Nanometric groove dimensions were 240 nm or 540 nm deep and 12.5 μm wide. Cells cultured on test surfaces followed contact guidance along the length of groove edges, elongated along their major axis and showed nuclear distortion; they formed more focal complexes and lower proportions of mature adhesions relative to planar controls. Down-regulation of the osteoblast marker genes RUNX2 and BMPR2 in primary and immortalized cells was observed on grooved substrates. Down-regulation appeared to directly correlate with focal adhesion maturation, indicating the involvement of ERK 1/2 negative feedback pathways following integrin-mediated FAK activation.

[1]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[2]  A. Boskey,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase signaling pathways regulate the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[3]  Renny T. Franceschi,et al.  Critical role of the extracellular signal–regulated kinase–MAPK pathway in osteoblast differentiation and skeletal development , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell-substrate interface. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[5]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[6]  R Geoff Richards,et al.  Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[7]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Nanotopographical control of human osteoprogenitor differentiation. , 2007, Current stem cell research & therapy.

[8]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[9]  R T Tranquillo,et al.  Self-organization of tissue-equivalents: the nature and role of contact guidance. , 1999, Biochemical Society symposium.

[10]  Hong-Hee Kim,et al.  Low proliferation and high apoptosis of osteoblastic cells on hydrophobic surface are associated with defective Ras signaling. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[11]  Amit Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2012, Trends in biotechnology.

[12]  D. Hamilton,et al.  The effect of substratum topography on osteoblast adhesion mediated signal transduction and phosphorylation. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[13]  H. Demirkiran Bioceramics for osteogenesis, molecular and cellular advances. , 2012, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[14]  D. Hammer,et al.  Focal contact assembly through cytoskeletal polymerization: steady state analysis , 1994, Journal of mathematical biology.

[15]  A Curtis,et al.  Activation of macrophage‐like cells by multiple grooved substrata. Topographical control of cell behaviour. , 1995, Cell biology international.

[16]  M. Biggs,et al.  Focal adhesions in osteoneogenesis , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[17]  M. Fukuzawa,et al.  MYCN downregulates integrin α1 to promote invasion of human neuroblastoma cells , 1992 .

[18]  Patricia J Keely,et al.  Focal adhesion regulation of cell behavior. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  P. Herzyk,et al.  Genomic analysis of the role of transcription factor C/EBPδ in the regulation of cell behaviour on nanometric grooves , 2013, Biomaterials.

[20]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  Apoptosis and Survival of Osteoblast-like Cells Are Regulated by Surface Attachment* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  R. G. Richards,et al.  Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. , 2010, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[22]  Matthew J. Dalby,et al.  Nanotopographical Control of Stem Cell Differentiation , 2010, Journal of tissue engineering.

[23]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Topographical control of cell behaviour: II. Multiple grooved substrata. , 1990, Development.

[24]  M. Fukuzawa,et al.  MYCN downregulates integrin alpha1 to promote invasion of human neuroblastoma cells. , 2008, International journal of oncology.

[25]  A. Aplin,et al.  Anchorage-dependent ERK signaling--mechanisms and consequences. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[26]  L. Gilboa,et al.  Bone morphogenetic protein receptor complexes on the surface of live cells: a new oligomerization mode for serine/threonine kinase receptors. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[27]  Elena Losina,et al.  Rates and Outcomes of Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  W. Liang,et al.  Studies on the orthogonal assembly of β-cyclodextrin-poly (ε-caprolactone) and ferrocene-poly (ethylene oxide). , 2013, Carbohydrate polymers.

[29]  K. Shakesheff,et al.  Human osteoprogenitor growth and differentiation on synthetic biodegradable structures after surface modification. , 2001, Bone.

[30]  Joan M. Taylor,et al.  Adhesion Stimulates Direct PAK1/ERK2 Association and Leads to ERK-dependent PAK1 Thr212 Phosphorylation* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  M. Hatten,et al.  New Directions in Neuronal Migration , 2002, Science.

[32]  G. Stein,et al.  Intricate gene regulatory networks of helix‐loop‐helix (HLH) proteins support regulation of bone‐tissue related genes during osteoblast differentiation , 2008, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[33]  M Navarro,et al.  Biomaterials in orthopaedics , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[34]  Sheila M. Thomas,et al.  An Shp2/SFK/Ras/Erk signaling pathway controls trophoblast stem cell survival. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[35]  R Geoff Richards,et al.  The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[36]  A. Besser,et al.  Force-induced adsorption and anisotropic growth of focal adhesions. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Lifeng Chi,et al.  Osteoblast alignment, elongation and migration on grooved polystyrene surfaces patterned by Langmuir-Blodgett lithography. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[38]  B. Geiger,et al.  Early molecular events in the assembly of the focal adhesion-stress fiber complex during fibroblast spreading. , 2004, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[39]  E. Spanjaard,et al.  Mechanotransduction: Vinculin Provides Stability when Tension Rises , 2013, Current Biology.

[40]  C. Helmick,et al.  Projections of US prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[41]  Micah Dembo,et al.  The dynamics and mechanics of endothelial cell spreading. , 2005, Biophysical journal.