100 million strong: A case study of group identification and deindividuation on Imgur.com

Online groups can become communities, developing group identification and fostering deindividuation. But is this possible for very large, anonymous groups with low barriers to entry, highly constrained formats, and great diversity of content? Applying social identity theory and social identification and deindividuation effects theory, this study assesses influences on group identification and deindividuation in the case of Imgur.com. Respondents reported slightly positive levels of the three forms of group identification, but mixed levels of two forms of deindividuation. As argued by proponents of computer-mediated communication, demographics play only a minor role on these outcomes. More involved usage, such as direct access and commenting on images, is more associated with these outcomes, while more basic usage, such as total hours and reading comments, has little influence. Deindividuation is positively associated with group identification.

[1]  Michele Tepper.  Usenet Communities and the Cultural Politics of Information , 2013 .

[2]  Norman Miller,et al.  Group Aggression: The Effects of Friendship Ties and Anonymity. , 1971 .

[3]  J. Turner,et al.  The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence , 1986 .

[4]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Measuring acceptance of computer-mediated communication systems , 1989, JASIS.

[5]  R. Rice.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation , 1987 .

[6]  A Self-Categorization Theory Perspective on Adolescent Boys’ Sexual Bullying of Girls , 2015, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[7]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[8]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[9]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  D. Poplin.  Communities: A Survey of Theories and Methods of Research , 1979 .

[11]  T. Postmes,et al.  Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality? , 2002 .

[12]  R. Rice,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2002 .

[13]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[14]  R. Watson,et al.  Investigation into deindividuation using a cross-cultural survey technique. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[16]  Craig Calhoun,et al.  Computer Technology, Large-Scale Social Integration, and the Local Community , 1986 .

[17]  E. Hargittai,et al.  THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1 , 2008 .

[18]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[19]  A. Pepitone,et al.  Deindividuation in the small group: further evidence. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  R. Rice.  Challenges facing research on wired cities , 1987 .

[21]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2002 .

[22]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Influence in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Effects of Anonymity on Group Behavior , 2001 .

[23]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[25]  T. Postmes,et al.  Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[26]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[27]  Grant Blank,et al.  WHO CREATES CONTENT? , 2013 .

[28]  Matt C. Howard,et al.  To boldly go where no group has gone before: An analysis of online group identity and validation of a measure , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users , 2011, CHI.

[30]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[31]  R. Spears,et al.  Paralanguage and social perception in computer‐mediated communication , 1992 .

[32]  J. Schradie.  THE DIGITAL PRODUCTION GAP IN GREAT BRITAIN , 2013 .

[33]  M. Hogg,et al.  Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: a perspective on group cohesiveness , 1995 .

[34]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[35]  Marina Schroder.  Handbook Of Organizational Communication An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 2016 .

[36]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other , 2011 .

[37]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 2000 .

[38]  S. Albrecht.  Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet , 2006 .

[39]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Analysis and Improvement of the Measurement of Interpersonal Attraction and Homophily , 2006 .

[40]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  When and How Does Depersonalization Increase Conformity to Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication? , 2006, Commun. Res..

[41]  S. R. Hiltz.  The Network Nation , 1978 .

[42]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Identifying Organizational Identification , 1992 .

[43]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[44]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Digital Divides From Access to Activities: Comparing Mobile and Personal Computer Internet Users , 2013 .

[45]  R. Rice,et al.  An Integrated Model of Knowledge Sharing in Contemporary Communication Environments , 2009 .

[46]  Clay Shirky.  Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[47]  Junghyun Kim,et al.  The effect of uniform virtual appearance on conformity intention: Social identity model of deindividuation effects and optimal distinctiveness theory , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Social Identity Theory of Leadership , 2001 .

[49]  L. Festinger,et al.  Some consequences of de-individuation in a group , 1952 .

[50]  K. Douglas,et al.  Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[51]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Building Member Attachment in Online Communities: Applying Theories of Group Identity and Interpersonal Bonds , 2012, MIS Q..

[52]  Lindsay H. Shaw,et al.  In Defense of the Internet: The Relationship between Internet Communication and Depression, Loneliness, Self-Esteem, and Perceived Social Support , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[53]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Communication Processes in Participatory Websites , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[54]  G. Gonzales,et al.  Information Technologies , 2019, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[55]  E. Diener.  Effects of prior destructive behavior, anonymity, and group presence on deindividuation and aggression. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Personal Mediated Communication and the Concept of Community in Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[57]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[58]  M. Cadinu,et al.  Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  Michael Bieber,et al.  Towards Systems Design for Supporting Enabling Communities , 2007, J. Community Informatics.

[60]  J. Buckner.  The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion , 1988 .

[61]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Common voice: Analysis of behavior modification and content convergence in a popular online community , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[63]  L. Webb,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships , 2010 .

[64]  Tharon W. Howard.  Chapter 1 – Why Design to Thrive? , 2010 .

[65]  Эшфорт Блейк,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 2012 .

[66]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[67]  L. Festinger,et al.  Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.