Achieving sustainable sanitation chains through better informed and more systematic improvements: lessons from multi-city research in Sub-Saharan Africa

This paper presents the synthesised findings of the SPLASH Urban Sanitation research programme through the framework of the sanitation service chain. Urban sanitation service chains are complex and fragmented, involving a multiplicity of service providers and typically resulting in unsustainable or inadequate services. The aggregate data set covers a wide range of research methods including; household surveys, a randomised control trial, a willingness to pay survey prototype testing of technologies, focus group discussions and deliberative forums. Thorough the research, it has been possible to identify situations where incremental improvements are being made with varying degrees of success. Most importantly, it has identified weaknesses to the sanitation service chains where progress is either slow or extremely limited. It is through these weaknesses that key questions affecting the long term sustainability of sanitation service chains need to be answered.

[1]  Albert M. Wright,et al.  Toward a strategic sanitation approach : improving the sustainability of urban sanitation in developing countries , 1997 .

[2]  Katrina J. Charles,et al.  Household demand for sanitation improvements in low-income informal settlements: A case of East African cities , 2014 .

[3]  Kempe Ronald Hope,et al.  Urban population growth in the Caribbean , 1983 .

[4]  Pamela Abbott,et al.  Sanitation markets in urban informal settlements of East Africa , 2015 .

[5]  Fred Rosensweig,et al.  Policy and Sector Reform to Accelerate Access to Improved Rural Sanitation , 2012 .

[6]  J. B. Gning,et al.  value proposition : Resource recovery from faecal sludge — Can it be he driver for improved sanitation ? , 2014 .

[7]  Isabel Günther,et al.  Access to better Toilets , 2014 .

[8]  Antonio Estache,et al.  Current Debates on Infrastructure Policy , 2007 .

[9]  Jonathan Parkinson,et al.  Strategic planning for municipal sanitation: a guide , 2000 .

[10]  Marion W. Jenkins,et al.  Behavioral indicators of household decision-making and demand for sanitation and potential gains from social marketing in Ghana. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[11]  A. E. U. Obika,et al.  Creating demand for urban sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa , 2006 .

[12]  Dena Fam,et al.  Designing sustainable sanitation: Involving design in innovative, transdisciplinary research , 2012 .

[13]  P. Scott,et al.  Tenure security and household investment decisions for urban sanitation: the case of Dakar, Senegal , 2013 .

[14]  Wedc Comparing National Sanitation Policy Content: An initial review of nine country profiles. , 2005 .

[15]  Innocent K. Tumwebaze,et al.  When is shared sanitation improved sanitation? - The correlation between number of users and toilet hygiene , 2012 .

[16]  Isabel C. Blackett,et al.  The missing link in sanitation service delivery : a review of fecal sludge management in 12 cities , 2014 .

[17]  Using local stakeholder knowledge to assess health risks and inform sanitation safety plans , 2013 .

[18]  Jonathan Parkinson,et al.  Urban Sanitation: A Guide to Strategic Planning , 2003 .

[19]  Brian Reed,et al.  Public health reform : lessons from history , 2006 .

[20]  Linda Strande,et al.  Results from FaME (Faecal Management Enterprises) - can dried faecal sludge fuel the sanitation service chain? , 2014 .

[21]  Ellen Wratten,et al.  Conceptualizing urban poverty , 1995 .