How songbirds deal with large amounts of serial information: retrieval rules suggest a hierarchical song memory

Abstract. Many songbirds develop remarkably large vocal repertoires, and this has prompted questions about how birds are able to successfully learn and use the often enormous amounts of information encoded in their various signal patterns. We have studied these questions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos), a species that performs more than 200 different types of songs (strophen), or more than 1000 phonetically different elements composing the songs. In particular, we investigated whether and how both song repertoires and song performance rules of nightingales were coded by auditory stimuli presented in serial learning experiments. Evaluation of singing episodes produced by our trained birds revealed that nightingales cope well with an exposure to even long strings of master song-types. They can readily acquire information encoded within and between the different master songs, and they memorize, for example, which master song-types they have experienced in the same learning context. Imitations of such song-types form distinct sequential associations that are termed “context groups”. Additionally, nightingales develop other song-type associations that are smaller in size and termed “package groups”. Package formation results from constraints of the acquisition mechanisms which obviously lead to a segmentation of auditorily perceived master song sequences. Further experimentation validated that the song memory of nightingales is organized in a hierarchical manner and holding information about “context groups” composed of packages, “package groups” composed of songs, and songs composed of song elements. The evidence suggests that implementation of such a hierarchical organization facilitates a quick retrieval of particular songs, and thereby provides an essential prerequisite for a functionally appropriate use of large vocal repertoire is in songbirds.

[1]  H. Scheich,et al.  Synaptic selection and calcium regulation: common mechanisms of auditory filial imprinting and vocal learning in birds? , 1988 .

[2]  P. Slater,et al.  A Simple Model for Competition Between Behaviour Patterns , 1978 .

[3]  Henrike Hultsch Tracing the Memory Mechanisms in the Song Acquisition of Nightingales , 1992 .

[4]  Daniel M. Weary,et al.  Dual strategies of song development in American redstarts, Setophaga ruticilla , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  George Houghton,et al.  Parallel Models of Serial Behaviour: Lashley Revisited , 1995 .

[6]  Nicholas S. Thompson,et al.  A SYSTEM FOR DESCRIBING BIRD SONG UNITS , 1994 .

[7]  K A Shiovitz,et al.  The process of species-specific song recognition by the indigo bunting, Passerina cyanea, and its relationship to the organization of avian acoustical behavior. , 1975, Behaviour.

[8]  Henrike Hultsch,et al.  Conditions Affecting Song Acquisition in Nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos L.) , 1979 .

[9]  R. A. Hinde,et al.  Alternative motor patterns in chaffinch song , 1958 .

[10]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird song learning: causes and consequences , 1989 .

[11]  D Margoliash,et al.  Distributed representation in the song system of oscines: evolutionary implications and functional consequences. , 1994, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[12]  Katharina Riebel,et al.  Light Flash Stimulation Alters the Nightingale's Singing Style: Implications for Song Control Mechanisms , 1997 .

[13]  Robert E. Lemon,et al.  Organization of song in cardinals , 1971 .

[14]  M. Naguib,et al.  Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  The search for neural mechanisms that define the sensitive period for song learning in birds , 1992 .

[16]  A. Doupe A neural circuit specialized for vocal learning , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  Jörg Böhner,et al.  Early acquisition of song in the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  D. Kroodsma,et al.  Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .

[19]  Dietmar Todt,et al.  Pattern and Time Specificity in Vocal Responses of Blackbirds Turdus Merula L , 1982 .

[20]  Henrike Hultsch,et al.  Early experience can modify singing styles: evidence from experiments with nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Robert E. Lemon,et al.  Markovian Versus Rhomboidal Patterning in the Song of Swainson's Thrush , 1977 .

[22]  Peter Marler,et al.  Song acquisition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris: a comparison of the songs of live-tutored, tape-tutored, untutored, and wild-caught males , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  P. Stoddard,et al.  Repertoire matching between neighbouring song sparrows , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Birdsong for neurobiologists , 1989, Neuron.

[25]  R. B. Payne,et al.  Song learning and social interaction in indigo buntings , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Developmental and seasonal changes in canary song and their relation to changes in the anatomy of song-control nuclei. , 1986, Behavioral and neural biology.

[27]  P. Marler,et al.  Developmental overproduction and selective attrition: new processes in the epigenesis of birdsong. , 1982, Developmental psychobiology.

[28]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations , 1995 .