Modulation of alignment, elongation and contraction of cardiomyocytes through a combination of nanotopography and rigidity of substrates.

The topographic and mechanical characteristics of engineered tissue constructs, simulating native tissues, should benefit tissue engineering. Previous studies reported that surface topography and substrate rigidity provide biomechanical cues to modulate cellular responses such as alignment, migration and differentiation. To fully address this issue, the present study aimed to examine the influence of nanogrooved substrates with different stiffnesses on the responses of rat cardiomyocytes. Nanogrooved substrates (450nm in groove/ridge width; 100 or 350nm in depth) made of polystyrene and polyurethane were prepared by imprinting from polydimethylsiloxane molds. The morphology and orientation of cardiomyocytes attached to the substrates were found to be influenced mainly by the nanogrooved structures, while the contractile function of the cells was regulated by the coupled effect of surface topography and substrate stiffness. The distribution of intracellular structural proteins such as vinculin and F-actin showed that the surface topography and substrate stiffness regulated the organization of the actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesion complexes, and consequently the contractile behavior of the cardiomyocytes. The beating rates of the cultured cardiomyocytes were dependent on both the surface topography and the substrate stiffness. The study provides insights into the interaction between cardiomyocytes and biomaterials, and benefits cardiac tissue engineering.

[1]  W. Clark,et al.  Cell contact as an independent factor modulating cardiac myocyte hypertrophy and survival in long-term primary culture. , 1998, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[2]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  The Development and Structure of the Ventricles in the Human Heart , 2009, Pediatric Cardiology.

[3]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Role of the cytoskeleton in the reaction of fibroblasts to multiple grooved substrata. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[4]  Juin-Yih Lai,et al.  Quantitative analysis of osteoblast-like cells (MG63) morphology on nanogrooved substrata with various groove and ridge dimensions. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[5]  V. Thomas,et al.  Biomechanical studies on aliphatic physically crosslinked poly(urethane urea) for blood contact applications , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[6]  Todd C McDevitt,et al.  Spatially organized layers of cardiomyocytes on biodegradable polyurethane films for myocardial repair. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[7]  Thomas Eschenhagen,et al.  Chronic stretch of engineered heart tissue induces hypertrophy and functional improvement , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[8]  I. Hall,et al.  Cell adhesion and mechanical properties of a flexible scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[9]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  Controlled delivery of PDGF-BB for myocardial protection using injectable self-assembling peptide nanofibers. , 2005, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[10]  P. Janmey,et al.  Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials , 2005 .

[11]  Shelly R Peyton,et al.  The effects of matrix stiffness and RhoA on the phenotypic plasticity of smooth muscle cells in a 3-D biosynthetic hydrogel system. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[12]  N. Severs,et al.  The cardiac muscle cell. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[13]  Andrew D McCulloch,et al.  Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[14]  A R Boccaccini,et al.  Myocardial tissue engineering: a review , 2007, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[15]  A Curtis,et al.  Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. , 1996, Experimental cell research.

[16]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  R. Dehaan,et al.  Electrical coupling among heart cells in the absence of ultrastructurally defined gap junctions , 2005, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[18]  J. Ohayon,et al.  The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[19]  S. Britland,et al.  Contact guidance of CNS neurites on grooved quartz: influence of groove dimensions, neuronal age and cell type. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[20]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  Microfabricated grooves recapitulate neonatal myocyte connexin43 and N-cadherin expression and localization. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[21]  Harold Bien,et al.  Scaffold topography alters intracellular calcium dynamics in cultured cardiomyocyte networks. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[22]  J. Moczko,et al.  Changes in heart rate variability caused by coronary angioplasty depend on the localisation of coronary lesions. , 2009, Kardiologia polska.

[23]  Peng-Yuan Wang,et al.  Modulation of alignment and differentiation of skeletal myoblasts by submicron ridges/grooves surface structure , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  M. Fukayama,et al.  Periostin is essential for cardiac healingafter acute myocardial infarction , 2008, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[25]  P. Moghe,et al.  Substrate microtopography can enhance cell adhesive and migratory responsiveness to matrix ligand density. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[26]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[27]  Smadar Cohen,et al.  Optimization of cardiac cell seeding and distribution in 3D porous alginate scaffolds. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[28]  P. Ohara,et al.  Contact guidance in vitro. A light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study. , 1979, Experimental cell research.

[29]  N. Nakatsuji,et al.  Experimental manipulation of a contact guidance system in amphibian gastrulation by mechanical tension , 1984, Nature.

[30]  K. Woodhouse,et al.  Polyurethane films seeded with embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes for use in cardiac tissue engineering applications. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[31]  T. Desai,et al.  Fabrication of microtextured membranes for cardiac myocyte attachment and orientation. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  Hsuan-Liang Liu,et al.  Fibronectin modulates the morphology of osteoblast-like cells (MG-63) on nano-grooved substrates , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[33]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Chao-Min Cheng,et al.  Composite polymer systems with control of local substrate elasticity and their effect on cytoskeletal and morphological characteristics of adherent cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[35]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[36]  P. Mattila,et al.  Contractility-dependent actin dynamics in cardiomyocyte sarcomeres , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[37]  Hyoungshin Park,et al.  Mechanical properties and remodeling of hybrid cardiac constructs made from heart cells, fibrin, and biodegradable, elastomeric knitted fabric. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[38]  H. Eppenberger,et al.  In vitro reestablishment of cell‐cell contacts in adult rat cardiomyocytes. Functional role of transmembrane components in the formation of new intercalated disk‐like cell contacts , 1999, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[39]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[40]  W. Tsai,et al.  Modulation of morphology and functions of human hepatoblastoma cells by nano-grooved substrata. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[41]  Milica Radisic,et al.  Interactive effects of surface topography and pulsatile electrical field stimulation on orientation and elongation of fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[42]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  New depths in cell behaviour: reactions of cells to nanotopography. , 1999, Biochemical Society symposium.

[43]  Satoshi Kawata,et al.  Control of cardiomyocyte orientation on a microscaffold fabricated by photopolymerization with laser beam interference. , 2006, Journal of biomedical optics.

[44]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Nanoscale cues regulate the structure and function of macroscopic cardiac tissue constructs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.