Industry Preparedness for Earthquakes and Earthquake-Triggered Hazmat Accidents in the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake

In this study, we report on the results of a random mail survey of 400 industrial facilities affected by the Turkey earthquake of 17 August 1999. The survey asked questions concerning damage and economic losses, hazardous materials and hazardous materials releases during the earthquake, and risk management and emergency response practices for hazmats prior to and after the earthquake. The study results indicate a high toll on industrial facilities in the region with more than 56% of industrial facilities reporting structural damage and over 60% reporting economic losses. A significantly higher number of industrial facilities built prior to the introduction of the first seismic building codes in 1975 suffered damage. In a logistic regression, older facilities and facilities owned by multinational firms were found to be more likely to suffer damages than Turkish-owned facilities or newer facilities. Eight percent of facilities handling hazardous materials suffered an earthquake-triggered hazardous materials release. Preparedness for earthquake-triggered hazardous materials releases prior to the earthquake was low, but increased significantly in the aftermath of the earthquake, especially for those facilities that had suffered earthquake damage.

[1]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Hazardous Materials Releases in the Northridge Earthquake: Implications for Seismic Risk Assessment , 1997 .

[2]  Enrico L Quarantelli,et al.  Initial findings from a study of socio-behavioral preparations and planning for acute chemical hazard disasters☆ , 1979 .

[3]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Earthquake Impacts and Hazard Adjustment by Acutely Hazardous Materials Facilities following the Northridge Earthquake , 1998 .

[4]  Thomas E. Drabek,et al.  Disaster Responses within the Tourist Industry , 1995, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[5]  Gary F. Bennett.  Chemical Hazards, Mitigation and Preparedness in Areas of High Seismic Risk: A Methodology for Estimating the Risk of Post-Earthquake Hazardous Materials Release, H.A. Seligson, R.T. Eguchi, K.J. Tierney, K. Richmond. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Chichester, UK (1996), price , 1998 .

[6]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Identifying and managing conjoint threats : Earthquake-induced hazardous materials releases in the US , 1996 .

[7]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Multi-method Assessment of Organizational Effectiveness in Local Emergency Planning Committees , 1996 .

[8]  James M. Dahlhamer,et al.  Businesses and Disasters: Empirical Patterns and Unanswered Questions , 2000 .

[9]  Richard T. Sylves,et al.  Disaster Management in the U.S. and Canada: The Politics, Policymaking, Administration and Analysis of Emergency Management , 1997 .

[10]  Laura J. Steinberg,et al.  When Natural and Technological Disasters Collide: Lessons from the Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999 , 2004 .

[11]  Qing Shen,et al.  Economic Impacts of the Loma Prieta Earthquake: A Focus on Small Businesses , 1991 .

[12]  James M. Dahlhamer,et al.  Determinants of Business-Disaster Preparedness in Two U.S. Metropolitan Areas , 1997, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[13]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Planning Effectiveness: Effectiveness of Community Planning for Toxic Chemical Emergencies , 1994 .

[14]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Effects of Organizational Environment, Internal Structure, and Team Climate on the Effectiveness of Local Emergency Planning Committees1 , 1995 .

[15]  Thomas E. Drabek,et al.  Disaster evacuation and the tourist industry , 1994 .

[16]  Jm Dahlamer,et al.  Determinants of Business Disaster Preparedness , 1997 .

[17]  P S Showalter,et al.  Natural disasters in the United States as release agents of oil, chemicals, or radiological materials between 1980-1989: analysis and recommendations. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.