The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields

Current research on e-journal usage patterns focuses more on measuring levels of use and measuring changes in reading patterns than developing theoretical models that enable the explanation and prediction of patterns in the adoption and uptake of e-journals across scientific fields. Typically, studies either focus on single disciplines or attempt to reach an overview of disciplinary differences by using broad disciplinary groupings, such as physical sciences, health sciences, applied technologies, social sciences, or humanities. We argue that there is a need for extending the domain analytic approach to incorporate a fuller understanding of the cultural characteristics of scientific specialisms, which include both epistemological and social considerations. To this end we suggest that Whitley's theory of the social organization of scholarly fields can be effectively used as an explanatory model of e-journal use across scientific fields. By using Whitley's theory we also illustrate the limitation of current approaches to the explanation of information practices and e-journal use that use the administrative unit of the discipline, or base comparison on coarse-grained aggregations as the unit of analysis, rather than the specialism.

[1]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. , 2002 .

[2]  Laura J. Neumann,et al.  The Information Work of Interdisciplinary Humanities Scholars: Exploration and Translation , 2002, The Library Quarterly.

[3]  Ghislaine Chartron,et al.  How French research scientists are making use of electronic journals: a case study conducted at Pierre et Marie Curie University and Denis Diderot University , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Rob Kling,et al.  Locally Controlled Scholarly Publishing Via the Internet: The Guild Model , 2002 .

[5]  Christine A. Barry,et al.  Critical issues in evaluating the impact of IT on information activity in academic research: Developing a qualitative research solution , 1995 .

[6]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Lisa Covi,et al.  Material Mastery: Situating Digital Library Use in University Research Practices , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[8]  Carole L. Palmer.  Aligning studies of information seeking and use with domain analysis , 1999 .

[9]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Documents, memory institutions and information science , 2000, J. Documentation.

[10]  Tonyia J. Tidline,et al.  Scholarly work in the humanities and the evolving information environment , 2001 .

[11]  Yin Zhang.  Scholarly use of internet-based electronic resources , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines , 2003, J. Documentation.

[13]  L.J.B. Mote,et al.  REASONS FOR THE VARIATIONS IN THE INFORMATION NEEDS OF SCIENTISTS , 1962 .

[14]  Cecelia M. Brown.  Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists , 1999 .

[15]  J. Hurd,et al.  Information-seeking behavior of health sciences faculty: the impact of new information technologies. , 1997, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[16]  Dagobert Soergel,et al.  The importance of SDI for current awareness in fields with severe scatter of information , 1979, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Kimmo Tuominen,et al.  Multiperspective digital libraries: The implications of constructionism for the development of digital libraries , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not Just a Matter of Time: Field Differences and the Shaping of Electronic Media , 1999 .

[20]  H. Albrechtsen,et al.  Toward a New Horizon in Information Science: Domain-Analysis , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Ken Eason,et al.  Patterns of use of electronic journals , 2000, J. Documentation.

[22]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[23]  Paul F. Burton,et al.  Electronic journals: a study of usage and attitudes among academics , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[24]  David Ellis,et al.  A Comparison of the Information seeking Patterns of researchers in the Physical and Social Sciences , 1993, J. Documentation.

[25]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Patterns of Journal Use by Scientists through Three Evolutionary Phases , 2003, D Lib Mag..

[26]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies , 2003 .

[27]  David Pullinger.  Academics and the new information environment: the impact of local factors on use of electronic journals , 1999, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[29]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Collaborative information synthesis , 2005, ASIST.