Lifestyle modification programmes for patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background Lifestyle modification programmes for coronary heart disease patients have been shown to effectively improve risk factors and related health behaviours, quality of life, reincidence, and mortality. However, improvements in routine cardiac care over the recent years may offset the incremental benefit associated with older programmes. Purpose To determine the efficacy of lifestyle modification programmes for coronary heart disease patients developed over the last decade (1999–2009) by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Results The study included 23 trials (involving 11,085 randomized patients). Lifestyle modification programmes were associated with reduced all-cause mortality (summary OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10–1.64), cardiac mortality (summary OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.17–1.88), and cardiac readmissions and non-fatal reinfarctions (summary OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.17–1.55). Furthermore, lifestyle modification programmes positively affected risk factors and related lifestyle behaviours at posttreatment (M = 10.2 months), and some of these benefits were maintained at long-term follow up (M = 33.7 months). Improvements in dietary and exercise behaviour were greater for programmes incorporating all four self-regulation techniques (i.e. goal setting, self-monitoring, planning, and feedback techniques) compared to interventions that included none of these techniques. Conclusion The evidence summarized in this meta-analysis confirms the benefits of lifestyle modification programmes – over and above benefits achieved by routine clinical care alone.

[1]  J. Chase Systematic Review of Physical Activity Intervention Studies After Cardiac Rehabilitation , 2011, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[2]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  S. Michie,et al.  A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: The CALO-RE taxonomy , 2011, Psychology & health.

[4]  Barry A Franklin,et al.  Recent advances in preventive cardiology and lifestyle medicine: a themed series. , 2011, Circulation.

[5]  R. Doughty,et al.  Understanding differences in results from literature-based and individual patient meta-analyses: an example from meta-analyses of observational data. , 2011, International journal of cardiology.

[6]  M. Cupples,et al.  Systematic Review of the Effect of Diet and Exercise Lifestyle Interventions in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease , 2010, Cardiology research and practice.

[7]  Richard Schulz,et al.  Intervention taxonomy (ITAX): describing essential features of interventions. , 2010, American journal of health behavior.

[8]  S. Maes,et al.  Psychological interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: Examining the role of self‐regulation with a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2010, Arthritis care & research.

[9]  R. Riley Commentary: like it and lump it? Meta-analysis using individual participant data. , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  R. Oostendorp,et al.  How to promote healthy behaviours in patients? An overview of evidence for behaviour change techniques , 2010, Health promotion international.

[11]  Paul Dendale,et al.  Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation , 2010, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[12]  C. Abraham,et al.  Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[13]  J. Newell,et al.  Effect of tailored practice and patient care plans on secondary prevention of heart disease in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  G. Kempen,et al.  The impact of a self‐management group programme on health behaviour and healthcare utilization among congestive heart failure patients , 2009, European journal of heart failure.

[16]  K. Kotseva,et al.  Cardiovascular prevention guidelines in daily practice: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, and III surveys in eight European countries , 2009, The Lancet.

[17]  Peter Jüni,et al.  Commentary: Which meta-analyses are conclusive? , 2009, International journal of epidemiology.

[18]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Global secondary prevention strategies to limit event recurrence after myocardial infarction: results of the GOSPEL study, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial from the Italian Cardiac Rehabilitation Network. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  G. Eide,et al.  How important are individual counselling, expectancy beliefs and autonomy for the maintenance of exercise after cardiac rehabilitation? , 2008, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[20]  R. Goud,et al.  Is the MacNew quality of life questionnaire a useful diagnostic and evaluation instrument for cardiac rehabilitation? , 2008, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[21]  C. Pischke,et al.  Long-term effects of lifestyle changes on well-being and cardiac variables among coronary heart disease patients. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[22]  R. Auer,et al.  Efficacy of In-Hospital Multidimensional Interventions of Secondary Prevention After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2008, Circulation.

[23]  O. Faergeman,et al.  Nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, family-based cardiovascular disease prevention programme (EUROACTION) for patients with coronary heart disease and asymptomatic individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a paired, cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[24]  A. Zwisler,et al.  Hospital-based comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care among patients with congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, or high risk of ischemic heart disease: 12-month results of a randomized clinical trial. , 2008, American heart journal.

[25]  H. Dalal,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom , 2008, Heart.

[26]  Neil C Campbell,et al.  Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: a 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care , 2008, Heart.

[27]  G. Eide,et al.  No difference in lifestyle changes by adding individual counselling to group-based rehabilitation RCT among coronary heart disease patients , 2007, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[28]  W. Linden,et al.  Psychological treatment of cardiac patients: a meta-analysis. , 2007, European heart journal.

[29]  Xiaolian Jiang,et al.  A nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation programme improves health behaviours and cardiac physiological risk parameters: evidence from Chengdu, China. , 2007, Journal of clinical nursing.

[30]  A. Clark,et al.  A critical realist approach to understanding and evaluating heart health programmes , 2007, Health.

[31]  S. Aldana,et al.  The Effects of an Intensive Lifestyle Modification Program on Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness: A Randomized Trial , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[32]  K. Postema,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of cardiac rehabilitation after revascularisation. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[33]  Vera Bittner,et al.  Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Pr , 2007, Circulation.

[34]  J. Coyne,et al.  Rebuttal: The black swan fallacy in evaluating psychological interventions for distress in cancer patients , 2006 .

[35]  J. Coyne,et al.  Psychological interventions for distress in cancer patients: a review of reviews , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[36]  J. Spinelli,et al.  The Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) after cardiac rehabilitation: a 4-year randomized controlled trial. , 2006, American heart journal.

[37]  T. Lancaster Review: secondary prevention programmes with and without exercise reduce all cause mortality and recurrent MI , 2006, Evidence-based medicine.

[38]  T. Vahlberg,et al.  Effects of health advocacy, counseling, and activation among older coronary heart disease (CHD) patients , 2005, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[39]  Lisa Hartling,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Secondary Prevention Programs for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[40]  L. Schou,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of hospital-based, comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care for patients with congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, or high risk of ischemic heart disease (the DANREHAB trial)--design, intervention, and population. , 2005, American heart journal.

[41]  H. Boshuizen,et al.  Effect Size Estimates of Lifestyle and Dietary Changes on All-Cause Mortality in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Systematic Review , 2005, Circulation.

[42]  Paul Karoly,et al.  Self‐Regulation Assessment and Intervention in Physical Health and Illness: A Review , 2005 .

[43]  K. Kotseva,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation for coronary patients: lifestyle, risk factor and therapeutic management. Results from the EUROASPIRE II survey , 2004 .

[44]  P. Murchie,et al.  Effects of secondary prevention clinics on health status in patients with coronary heart disease: 4 year follow-up of a randomized trial in primary care. , 2004, Family practice.

[45]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study , 2004, The Lancet.

[46]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[47]  J. Otterstad Influence on lifestyle measures and five-year coronary risk by a comprehensive lifestyle intervention programme in patients with coronary heart disease , 2003, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[48]  J. Spinelli,et al.  The Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) following cardiac rehabilitation trial. , 2003, European heart journal.

[49]  J. Simpson,et al.  Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: four year follow up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[50]  Hye-Sun Jeong,et al.  An individualized teaching program for atherosclerotic risk factor reduction in patients with myocardial infarction. , 2002, Yonsei medical journal.

[51]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Exercise‐based Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[52]  A. Ignaszewski,et al.  Extensive lifestyle management intervention following cardiac rehabilitation: pilot study. , 2001, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[53]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Randomised trials of secondary prevention programmes in coronary heart disease: systematic review , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[54]  C. Morrison,et al.  Nurse led shared care for patients on the waiting list for coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomised controlled trial , 2001, Heart.

[55]  K. McKenna,et al.  Rehabilitation outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[56]  I. Heilmbauer,et al.  A case-management program of medium intensity does not improve cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary artery disease patients: the Heartcare I trial. , 2001, The American journal of medicine.

[57]  I. Piña,et al.  Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Writing Group. , 2000, Circulation.

[58]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Management of coronary risk factors by registered nurses versus usual care in patients with unstable angina pectoris (a chest pain evaluation in the emergency room [CHEER] substudy). , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[59]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[60]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Physiologic and related behavioral outcomes from the Women’s Lifestyle Heart Trial , 2000, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[61]  A. Öhman,et al.  Two-year results of a controlled study of residential rehabilitation for patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A randomized study of a multifactorial programme. , 1999, European heart journal.

[62]  M. Cupples,et al.  Five year follow up of patients at high cardiovascular risk who took part in randomised controlled trial of health promotion , 1999, BMJ.

[63]  J. Meulman,et al.  A meta-analysis of psychoeducational programs for coronary heart disease patients. , 1999 .

[64]  Eber,et al.  Effects of intensified lifestyle modification on the need for further revascularization after coronary angioplasty , 1999, European journal of clinical investigation.

[65]  A. Öhman,et al.  Behavioral effects of a comprehensive, multifactorial program for lifestyle change after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study. , 1999, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[66]  K. Gould,et al.  Intensive lifestyle changes for reversal of coronary heart disease. , 1998, JAMA.

[67]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Behavioral and psychosocial effects of intensive lifestyle management for women with coronary heart disease. , 1998, Patient education and counseling.

[68]  L D Ritchie,et al.  Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: a randomised trial of nurse led clinics in primary care , 1998, Heart.

[69]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[70]  N. Campbell,et al.  Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: randomised trial of effect on health , 1998, BMJ.

[71]  G. A. Febbraro,et al.  Meta-analytic investigation of the effectiveness of self-regulatory components in the treatment of adult problem behaviors. , 1998, Clinical psychology review.

[72]  Helena C. Kraemer,et al.  Advantages of excluding underpowered studies in meta-analysis: Inclusionist versus exclusionist viewpoints. , 1998 .

[73]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[74]  M. Cupples,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of health promotion in general practice for patients at high cardiovascular risk , 1994, BMJ.

[75]  A. Astrup,et al.  Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart disease? , 1990, The Lancet.

[76]  R. Brand,et al.  Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart disease? The Lifestyle Heart Trial , 1990, The Lancet.

[77]  R. Rosenthal The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[78]  G. Kok,et al.  Standard care quality determines treatment outcomes in control groups of HAART-adherence intervention studies: implications for the interpretation and comparison of intervention effects. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[79]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  Decoding health education interventions: the times are a-changin'. , 2009, Psychology & health.

[80]  S. Allender,et al.  European cardiovascular disease statistics , 2008 .

[81]  Vera Bittner,et al.  Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update. , 2007, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[82]  L. Rydén,et al.  Long-term effects of lifestyle behavior change in coronary artery disease: effects on recurrent coronary events after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[83]  Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine BioMed Central Open Access Current 32002, Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine , 2002 .

[84]  J. Meulman,et al.  A meta-analysis of psychoeduational programs for coronary heart disease patients. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[85]  L. Rydén,et al.  Multifactorial evaluation of a program for lifestyle behavior change in rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. , 1999, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.