Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Complex Aircraft Configurations via an Adjoint Formulation

This work describes the implementation of optimization techniques based on control theory for complex aircraft configurations. Here control theory is employed to derive the adjoint differential equations, the solution of which allows for a drastic reduction in computational costs over previous design methods (13, 12, 43, 38). In our earlier studies (19, 20, 22, 23, 39, 25, 40, 41, 42) it was shown that this method could be used to devise effective optimization procedures for airfoils, wings and wing-bodies subject to either analytic or arbitrary meshes. Design formulations for both potential flows and flows governed by the Euler equations have been demonstrated, showing that such methods can be devised for various governing equations (39, 25). In our most recent works (40, 42) the method was extended to treat wing-body configurations with a large number of mesh points, verifying that significant computational savings can be gained for practical design problems. In this paper the method is extended for the Euler equations to treat complete aircraft configurations via a new multiblock implementation. New elements include a multiblock-multigrid flow solver, a multiblock-multigrid adjoint solver, and a multiblock mesh perturbation scheme. Two design examples are presented in which the new method is used for the wing redesign of a transonic business jet.

[1]  J. Lions.  Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations , 1971 .

[2]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  An assessment of airfoil design by numerical optimization , 1974 .

[3]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Wing Design by Numerical Optimization , 1977 .

[4]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[5]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[6]  R. A. Kennelly.  Improved method for transonic airfoil design-by-optimization , 1983 .

[7]  A. Jameson.  Solution of the Euler equations for two dimensional transonic flow by a multigrid method , 1983 .

[8]  Joe F. Thompson,et al.  Numerical grid generation: Foundations and applications , 1985 .

[9]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Multigrid algorithms for compressible flow calculations , 1986 .

[10]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[11]  V. Korivi,et al.  Sensitivity analysis, approximate analysis, and design optimization for internal and external viscous flows , 1991 .

[12]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization using sensitivity analysis and computational fluid dynamics , 1991 .

[13]  O. Baysal,et al.  Aerodynamic Sensitivity Analysis Methods for the Compressible Euler Equations , 1991 .

[14]  G. Burgreen,et al.  Improving the efficiency of aerodynamic shape optimization procedures , 1992 .

[15]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  Subsonic and Transonic Low-Reynolds-Number Airfoils with Reduced Pitching Moments , 1992 .

[16]  P. A. Newman,et al.  An incremental strategy for calculating consistent discrete CFD sensitivity derivatives , 1992 .

[17]  Arthur C. Taylor,et al.  Observations on computational methodologies for use in large-scale, gradient-based, multidisciplinary design , 1992 .

[18]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Practical design optimization of wing/body configurations using the Euler equations , 1992 .

[19]  M. D. Salas,et al.  Aerodynamic design and optimization in one shot , 1992 .

[20]  Michael B. Bieterman,et al.  Practical Design and Optimization in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 1993 .

[21]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Airfoil Shape Optimization Using Sensitivity Analysis on Viscous Flow Equations , 1993 .

[22]  A. Jameson,et al.  Control theory based airfoil design for potential flow and a finite volume discretization , 1994 .

[23]  G. Kuruvila,et al.  Airfoil Optimization by the One-Shot Method , 1994 .

[24]  P. A. Newman,et al.  Sensitivity derivatives for three dimensional supersonic Euler code using incremental iterative strategy , 1994 .

[25]  P. A. Newman,et al.  Aerodynamic optimization studies using a 3-D supersonic Euler code with efficient calculation of sensitivity derivatives , 1994 .

[26]  A. Jameson.  Optimum aerodynamic design via boundary control , 1994 .

[27]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Control theory based airfoil design using the Euler equations , 1994 .

[28]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Three-dimensional aerodynamic shape optimization of wings using sensitivity analysis , 1994 .

[29]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization using preconditioned conjugate gradient methods , 1994 .

[30]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Preconditioned domain decomposition scheme for three-dimensional aerodynamic sensitivity analysis , 1994 .

[31]  A. Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization of wing and wing-body configurations using control theory , 1995 .

[32]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Supersonic wing and wing-body shape optimization using an adjoint formulation , 1995 .

[33]  A. Jameson,et al.  A comparison of design variables for control theory based airfoil optimization , 1995 .

[34]  M. D. Salas,et al.  Airfoil Design and Optimization by the One-Shot Method , 1995 .

[35]  Ramesh Agarwal,et al.  Airfoil design via control theory using full potential and Euler equations , 1996 .

[36]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Automatic aerodynamic optimization on distributed memory architectures , 1996 .

[37]  Vijay Modi,et al.  Design of minimum drag bodies in incompressible laminar flow , 1996 .

[38]  Neal Pfeiffer,et al.  Business jet wing design using aerodynamic shape optimization , 1996 .