Geometry Design Optimization of Functionally Graded Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Mechanobiological Approach

Functionally Graded Scaffolds (FGSs) are porous biomaterials where porosity changes in space with a specific gradient. In spite of their wide use in bone tissue engineering, possible models that relate the scaffold gradient to the mechanical and biological requirements for the regeneration of the bony tissue are currently missing. In this study we attempt to bridge the gap by developing a mechanobiology-based optimization algorithm aimed to determine the optimal graded porosity distribution in FGSs. The algorithm combines the parametric finite element model of a FGS, a computational mechano-regulation model and a numerical optimization routine. For assigned boundary and loading conditions, the algorithm builds iteratively different scaffold geometry configurations with different porosity distributions until the best microstructure geometry is reached, i.e. the geometry that allows the amount of bone formation to be maximized. We tested different porosity distribution laws, loading conditions and scaffold Young’s modulus values. For each combination of these variables, the explicit equation of the porosity distribution law–i.e the law that describes the pore dimensions in function of the spatial coordinates–was determined that allows the highest amounts of bone to be generated. The results show that the loading conditions affect significantly the optimal porosity distribution. For a pure compression loading, it was found that the pore dimensions are almost constant throughout the entire scaffold and using a FGS allows the formation of amounts of bone slightly larger than those obtainable with a homogeneous porosity scaffold. For a pure shear loading, instead, FGSs allow to significantly increase the bone formation compared to a homogeneous porosity scaffolds. Although experimental data is still necessary to properly relate the mechanical/biological environment to the scaffold microstructure, this model represents an important step towards optimizing geometry of functionally graded scaffolds based on mechanobiological criteria.

[1]  Carmine Pappalettere,et al.  A model of tissue differentiation and bone remodelling in fractured vertebrae treated with minimally invasive percutaneous fixation , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[2]  Eugenio Guglielmelli,et al.  Load-Adaptive Scaffold Architecturing: A Bioinspired Approach to the Design of Porous Additively Manufactured Scaffolds with Optimized Mechanical Properties , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Mohan Edirisinghe,et al.  Novel preparation of graded porous structures for medical engineering , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  Patrick J. Prendergast,et al.  A Mechanobiological Model for Tissue Differentiation that Includes Angiogenesis: A Lattice-Based Modeling Approach , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Peter Greil,et al.  Functionally graded materials for biomedical applications , 2003 .

[6]  L. Geris,et al.  A computational model for cell/ECM growth on 3D surfaces using the level set method: a bone tissue engineering case study , 2014, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[7]  Patrick J. Prendergast,et al.  Tissue differentiation and bone regeneration in an osteotomized mandible: a computational analysis of the latency period , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[8]  S. Licoccia,et al.  Graded porous polyurethane foam: a potential scaffold for oro-maxillary bone regeneration. , 2015, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[9]  Melissa A Grunlan,et al.  Continuous gradient scaffolds for rapid screening of cell-material interactions and interfacial tissue regeneration. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[10]  I G Turner,et al.  Fabrication of HA/TCP scaffolds with a graded and porous structure using a camphene-based freeze-casting method. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  Luciano Lamberti,et al.  EFFECTS OF AGING ON THE LATENCY PERIOD IN MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS: A COMPUTATIONAL MECHANOBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS , 2008 .

[12]  Tabatabaei Qomi,et al.  The Design of Scaffolds for Use in Tissue Engineering , 2014 .

[13]  J. Leong,et al.  Controllable porosity hydroxyapatite ceramics as spine cage: fabrication and properties evaluation , 2003, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[14]  R. Huiskes,et al.  A biomechanical regulatory model for periprosthetic fibrous-tissue differentiation , 1997, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[15]  Y. Yang,et al.  Graded Porous β-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds Enhance Bone Regeneration in Mandible Augmentation , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[16]  Carmine Pappalettere,et al.  A mechano‐regulation model of fracture repair in vertebral bodies , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  S. Hollister,et al.  Optimization of scaffold design for bone tissue engineering: A computational and experimental study. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  Jan Wieding,et al.  Numerical optimization of open-porous bone scaffold structures to match the elastic properties of human cortical bone. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[19]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  Philip Kollmannsberger,et al.  How Linear Tension Converts to Curvature: Geometric Control of Bone Tissue Growth , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[22]  Jiandong Ding,et al.  Effect of porosities of bilayered porous scaffolds on spontaneous osteochondral repair in cartilage tissue engineering , 2015, Regenerative biomaterials.

[23]  P. Prendergast,et al.  A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  W. Yeong,et al.  Engineering functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2008, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[25]  C. Pappalettere,et al.  International Journal of Biological Sciences , 2011 .

[26]  Sara Checa,et al.  Simulation of angiogenesis and cell differentiation in a CaP scaffold subjected to compressive strains using a lattice modeling approach. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[27]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[28]  M. V. D. van der Meulen,et al.  A mathematical framework to study the effects of growth factor influences on fracture healing. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  K. F. Leong,et al.  Selective laser sintering of functionally graded tissue scaffolds , 2011 .

[30]  W. J. Hendrikson,et al.  Modeling mechanical signals on the surface of µCT and CAD based rapid prototype scaffold models to predict (early stage) tissue development , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[31]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[32]  C. Pappalettere,et al.  The Influence of Expansion Rates on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: A Computational Analysis , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[34]  A Tampieri,et al.  Porosity-graded hydroxyapatite ceramics to replace natural bone. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[35]  K. Leong,et al.  The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[36]  J. Ferreira,et al.  Development of porous ceramic bodies for applications in tissue engineering and drug delivery systems , 2004 .

[37]  S. M. Ahmadi,et al.  Mechanical analysis of a rodent segmental bone defect model: the effects of internal fixation and implant stiffness on load transfer. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  Byong-Taek Lee,et al.  Fabrication of pore-gradient Al2O3–ZrO2 sintered bodies by fibrous monolithic process , 2006 .

[39]  Dan Sun,et al.  Graded/Gradient Porous Biomaterials , 2009, Materials.

[40]  Luciano Lamberti,et al.  A Mechanobiology-based Algorithm to Optimize the Microstructure Geometry of Bone Tissue Scaffolds , 2016, International journal of biological sciences.

[41]  Xiang Li,et al.  Influence of Architecture of β-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds on Biological Performance in Repairing Segmental Bone Defects , 2012, PloS one.

[42]  Amir A Zadpoor,et al.  Bone tissue regeneration: the role of scaffold geometry. , 2015, Biomaterials science.

[43]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling of angiogenesis in porous biomaterial scaffolds. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[44]  Colleen L Flanagan,et al.  Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis. , 2015, Medical engineering & physics.