Analysis of Non-Uniform Shrinkage Effect in Box Girder Sections for Long-Span Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge

To consider the effect of non-uniform shrinkage of box girder sections on the long-term deformations of continuous rigid frame bridges, and to improve the prediction accuracy of analysis in the design phase, this paper proposes a new simulation technique for use with general-purpose finite element program. The non-uniform shrinkage effect of the box girder is transformed to an equivalent temperature gradient and then applied as external load onto the beam elements in the finite element analysis. Comparative analysis of the difference in deflections between uniform shrinkage and nonuniform shrinkage of the main girder was made for a vehicular bridge in reality using the proposed technique. The results indicate that the maximum deflection of box girder under the action of non-uniform shrinkage is much greater than that under the action of uniform shrinkage. The maximum downward deflection of the bridge girder caused by uniform shrinkage is 5.6 mm at 20 years after completion of bridge deck construction, whereas the maximum downward deflection caused by non-uniform shrinkage is 21.6 mm, which is 3.8 times larger. This study shows that the non-uniform shrinkage effect of the girder sections has a significant impact on the long-term deflection of continuous rigid frame bridge, and it can be accurately simulated by the proposed transformation technique.

[1]  V. Tryhuk,et al.  Report on the absolute differential equations I , 2015, 1504.00342.

[2]  Xu Jun-lan Analysis of Parameters Affecting the Midspan Deformation of Continuous Rigid Frame Bridge , 2007 .

[3]  Comite Euro-International du Beton,et al.  CEB-FIP Model Code 1990 , 1993 .

[4]  Reinforced Concrete Highway Bridges Proposed Standard Specifications for the Design and Construction of Stone, Concrete, and Reinforced Concrete Highway Bridges and Culverts , 1913 .

[5]  Ian N. Robertson,et al.  Prediction of vertical deflections for a long-span prestressed concrete bridge structure , 2005 .

[6]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Excessive Long-Time Deflections of Prestressed Box Girders. II: Numerical Analysis and Lessons Learned , 2012 .

[7]  Hikaru Nakamura,et al.  Misprediction of long-time deflections of prestressed box girders : Causes , remedies and tendon layout effect , .

[8]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Misprediction of long-time deflections of prestressed box girders: Causes, remedies and tendon layout effect , 2009 .

[9]  Zdenek P. Bazant,et al.  Box Girder Bridge Deflections , 2006 .

[10]  Z. P. Bažant,et al.  Nonlinear water diffusion in nonsaturated concrete , 1972 .

[11]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Pervasiveness of Excessive Segmental Bridge Deflections: Wake-Up Call for Creep , 2011 .

[12]  Rimantas Kacianauskas,et al.  Long-term deflections of reinforced concrete elements: accuracy analysis of predictions by different methods , 2013 .

[13]  Zdenek P. Bazant,et al.  Creep and Shrinkage Prediction Model for Analysis and Design of Concretetructures: Model B3 , 2000, SP-194: The Adam Neville Symposium: Creep and Shrinkage-Structural Design Effects.

[14]  W. Sung,et al.  Layer model for long-term deflection analysis of cracked reinforced concrete bending members , 2012 .

[15]  A.K.H. Kwan,et al.  Shrinkage movement analysis of reinforced concrete floors constructed in stages , 2009 .

[16]  Peter F. Takács Deformations in Concrete Cantilever Bridges: Observations and Theoretical Modelling , 2002 .

[17]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Excessive Long-Time Deflections of Prestressed Box Girders. I: Record-Span Bridge in Palau and Other Paradigms , 2012 .

[18]  Miloš Zich,et al.  Long-Term Deflections of Cantilever Segmental Bridges , 2013 .

[19]  E. A. Clark,et al.  CEB-FIP Model Code 1990 , 1995 .