Using quantitative image analysis to classify axillary lymph nodes on breast MRI: a new application for the Z 0011 Era.

PURPOSE To assess the performance of computer extracted feature analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance images (MRI) of axillary lymph nodes. To determine which quantitative features best predict nodal metastasis. METHODS This institutional board-approved HIPAA compliant study, in which informed patient consent was waived, collected enhanced T1 images of the axilla from patients with breast cancer. Lesion segmentation and feature analysis were performed on 192 nodes using a laboratory-developed quantitative image analysis (QIA) workstation. The importance of 28 features were assessed. Classification used the features as input to a neural net classifier in a leave-one-case-out cross-validation and evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values for features in the task of distinguishing between positive and negative nodes ranged from just over 0.50 to 0.70. Five features yielded AUCs greater than 0.65: two morphological and three textural features. In cross-validation, the neural net classifier obtained an AUC of 0.88 (SE 0.03) for the task of distinguishing between positive and negative nodes. CONCLUSION QIA of DCE MRI demonstrated promising performance in discriminating between positive and negative axillary nodes.

[1]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  M. Giger,et al.  Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. , 2010, Radiology.

[3]  Li Lan,et al.  Computerized assessment of breast lesion malignancy using DCE-MRI robustness study on two independent clinical datasets from two manufacturers. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[4]  Lorenzo L. Pesce,et al.  Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[5]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Evaluation of clinical breast MR imaging performed with prototype computer-aided diagnosis breast MR imaging workstation: reader study. , 2011, Radiology.

[6]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  A Fuzzy C-Means (FCM)-Based Approach for Computerized Segmentation of Breast Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images1 , 2006 .

[7]  L. Esserman,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. , 2012, Radiology.

[8]  Maryellen Giger,et al.  Computerized three-class classification of MRI-based prognostic markers for breast cancer , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. , 2004, Medical physics.

[10]  A. Giuliano,et al.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. , 2011, JAMA.

[11]  Mriganka Sur,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian modeling and Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling for tuning-curve analysis. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Giger,et al.  Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. , 2006, Medical physics.

[13]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer on mammograms , 1997, Breast cancer.

[14]  M. Giger,et al.  Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance images , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[16]  M. Giger,et al.  Combined use of T2‐weighted MRI and T1‐weighted dynamic contrast–enhanced MRI in the automated analysis of breast lesions , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.