STATISTICAL STUDY OF 2XMMi-DR3/SDSS-DR8 CROSS-CORRELATION SAMPLE

Cross-correlating the XMM-Newton 2XMMi-DR3 catalog with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 8, we obtain one of the largest X-ray/optical catalogs and explore the distribution of various classes of X-ray emitters in the multidimensional photometric parameter space. Quasars and galaxies occupy different zones while stars scatter in them. However, X-ray active stars have a certain distributing rule according to spectral types. The earlier the type of stars, the stronger its X-ray emitting. X-ray active stars have a similar distribution to most stars in the g – r versus r – i diagram. Based on the identified samples with SDSS spectral classification, a random forest algorithm for automatic classification is performed. The result shows that the classification accuracy of quasars and galaxies adds up to more than 93.0% while that of X-ray emitting stars only amounts to 45.3%. In other words, it is easy to separate quasars and galaxies, but it is difficult to discriminate X-ray active stars from quasars and galaxies. If we want to improve the accuracy of automatic classification, it is necessary to increase the number of X-ray emitting stars, since the majority of X-ray emitting sources are quasars and galaxies. The results obtained here will be used for the optical spectral survey performed by the Large sky Area Multi-Object fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST, also named the Guo Shou Jing Telescope), which is a Chinese national scientific research facility operated by the National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

[1]  Aniruddha R. Thakar,et al.  ERRATUM: “THE EIGHTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY: FIRST DATA FROM SDSS-III” (2011, ApJS, 193, 29) , 2011 .

[2]  Jun Li,et al.  THE NEXT GENERATION ATLAS OF QUASAR SPECTRAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS FROM RADIO TO X-RAYS , 2011, 1107.1855.

[3]  Tenerife,et al.  New ultracool subdwarfs identified in large-scale surveys using Virtual Observatory tools (Corrigendum) - I. UKIDSS LAS DR5 vs. SDSS DR7 , 2012, 1204.4328.

[4]  Patrick Petitjean,et al.  Artificial neural networks for quasar selection and photometric redshift determination , 2010 .

[5]  E. al.,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary , 2000, astro-ph/0006396.

[6]  P. Dubath,et al.  Random forest automated supervised classification of Hipparcos periodic variable stars , 2011, 1101.2406.

[7]  P. Gondoin,et al.  XMM-Newton observatory. I. The spacecraft and operations , 2001 .

[8]  Xue-Bing Wu,et al.  DISCOVERING BRIGHT QUASARS AT INTERMEDIATE REDSHIFTS BASED ON OPTICAL/NEAR-INFRARED COLORS , 2012, 1207.0204.

[9]  Yanxia Zhang,et al.  Automated classification of pointed sources , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[10]  W. N. Brandt,et al.  DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC X-RAY SURVEYS , 2005 .

[11]  Chad M. Schafer,et al.  Semi-supervised learning for photometric supernova classification★ , 2011, 1103.6034.

[12]  D. Schlegel,et al.  Maps of Dust IR Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and CMBR Foregrounds , 1997, astro-ph/9710327.

[13]  Raffaele D'Abrusco,et al.  Astroinformatics of galaxies and quasars: a new general method for photometric redshifts estimation , 2011, 1107.3160.

[14]  K. Abazajian,et al.  THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2008, 0812.0649.

[15]  J. Newman,et al.  Accepted for publication in ApJ Letters Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 6/22/04 AEGIS: THE COLOR-MAGNITUDE RELATION FOR X-RAY SELECTED AGN , 2006 .

[16]  R. Scholz Hip 63510C, Hip 73786B, and nine new isolated high proper motion T dwarf candidates from UKIDSS DR6 and SDSS DR7 , 2010, 1002.3073.

[17]  D. Schlegel,et al.  Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds , 1998 .

[18]  I. M. Stewart,et al.  The XMM-Newton serendipitous survey. V. The Second XMM-Newton serendipitous source catalogue , 2008, 0807.1067.

[19]  J. Richards,et al.  ON MACHINE-LEARNED CLASSIFICATION OF VARIABLE STARS WITH SPARSE AND NOISY TIME-SERIES DATA , 2011, 1101.1959.

[20]  A. Georgakakis,et al.  A serendipitous XMM survey of the SDSS: the evolution of the colour–magnitude diagram of X-ray AGN from z= 0.8 to 0.1 , 2011, 1101.4943.

[21]  L. Guzzo,et al.  The XMM-Newton wide-field survey in the COSMOS field - The point-like X-ray source catalogue , 2009, 0901.2347.

[22]  M. Irwin,et al.  The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS) , 2006, astro-ph/0604426.

[23]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[24]  T. Sakamoto,et al.  THE 22 MONTH SWIFT-BAT ALL-SKY HARD X-RAY SURVEY , 2009, 0903.3037.

[25]  Alexander S. Szalay,et al.  RANDOM FORESTS FOR PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS , 2010 .

[26]  Manuel Güdel,et al.  X-ray spectroscopy of stars , 2009, 0904.3078.

[27]  R. F. Mushotzky,et al.  Resolving the extragalactic hard X-ray background , 2000, Nature.