How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module

Abstract An informal mathematical module integrating Arts (modifying STEM to STEAM) and following an inquiry-based learning approach was applied to a sample of 392 students (aged 12–13 years). The three lesson module dealt with mathematical phenomena providing participants with the commercially available hands-on construction kit, aiming to advance STEAM education. Pupils built original, personal, and individual geometrical structures by using plastic pipes in allowing high levels of creativity as well as of autonomy. Tutors supervised the construction process and intervened only on demand. A pre-/post-test design monitored the cognitive knowledge and the variables of relative autonomy, visual reasoning, formal operations as well as creativity. Our informal intervention produced newly acquired cognitive knowledge which as a process was shown of being supported by a broad basis of (soft) factors as described above. A path analysis elaborated the role of creativity (measured with two subscale: act and flow) to cognitive learning (post-knowledge), when flow was shown to lead. Pre-knowledge scores were significantly influenced by both creativity subscales: act and flow. However, relative autonomy, visual reasoning and formal operations contributed, too. In consequence, cognitive learning within STEAM modules was shown dependent on external triggers. Conclusions for appropriate educational settings to foster STEAM environments are discussed.

[1]  H. Gardner,et al.  An Exchange: The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach. , 1992 .

[2]  D. Kuhn.  Education for Thinking , 1986, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[3]  Mari-Pauliina Vainikainen,et al.  Learning with dinosaurs: a study on motivation, cognitive reasoning, and making observations , 2017 .

[4]  Hannu Salmi,et al.  Mathematical thinking skills, self-concept and learning outcomes of 12-year-olds visiting a Mathematics Science Centre Exhibition in Latvia and Sweden , 2015 .

[5]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Making cooperative learning work , 1999 .

[6]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[7]  Frank Oppenheimer.  A Rationale for a Science Museum , 1968 .

[8]  K. Fenyvesi,et al.  Hands-On Math and Art Exhibition Promoting Science Attitudes and Educational Plans , 2017 .

[9]  J. Wohlwill,et al.  Curiosity, imagination, and play : on the development of spontaneous cognitive and motivational processes , 1987 .

[10]  Sebastian Ehrlichmann,et al.  Young Peoples Images Of Science , 2016 .

[11]  Hannu Salmi,et al.  Science centres as learning laboratories: experiences of Heureka, the Finnish Science Centre , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[12]  Cheryl McCarthy,et al.  Effects of thematic-based, hands-on science teaching versus a textbook approach for students with disabilities , 2005 .

[13]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Epistemology and Psychology of Functions , 1977 .

[14]  J. Grady.  Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought , 2002 .

[15]  Z. Lavicza,et al.  Experiential Education of Mathematics: Art and Games for Digital Natives , 2015 .

[16]  M. Shayer,et al.  HAS PIAGET'S CONSTRUCT OF FORMAL OPERATIONAL THINKING ANY UTILITY? , 1979 .

[17]  Frederick J. Brigham,et al.  Science Education and Students with Learning Disabilities , 2011 .

[18]  M. Shayer,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF PIAGETIAN STAGES OF THINKING IN BRITISH MIDDLE AND SECONDARY SCHOOL CHILDREN , 1976 .

[19]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Current Approaches to Science Education , 1993 .

[20]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Joachim Walther,et al.  Learning Together: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration of STEAM (STEM + the Arts) Education , 2016 .

[23]  Mari-Pauliina Vainikainen,et al.  Situational interest and learning in a science center mathematics exhibition , 2015 .

[24]  T. Lord,et al.  101 Reasons for Using Cooperative Learning in Biology Teaching , 2001 .

[25]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[26]  W. Huff.  EXPERIENCE OR EDUCATION , 1968 .

[27]  Anna Craft,et al.  Pedagogy and Possibility Thinking in the Early Years , 2006 .

[28]  E. Wong,et al.  Predictors of global self-worth and academic performance among regular education, learning disabled, and continuation high school students. , 1998, Adolescence.

[29]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Learning Science Outside of School , 2014 .

[30]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[31]  Amber D. Dumford,et al.  Creative Cognitive Processes in Higher Education , 2016 .

[32]  E. Faure,et al.  Learning to Be: The World of Education Today and Tomorrow , 1979 .

[33]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Introducing a fifth pedagogy: experience‐based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments , 2009 .

[34]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[35]  Martin Braund,et al.  Towards a More Authentic Science Curriculum: The contribution of out‐of‐school learning , 2006 .

[36]  E. Deci,et al.  Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. , 2002 .

[37]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry: Building Instructional Capacity Through Professional Development , 2012 .

[38]  P. Burnard.  (Re)positioning creativities in relation to effective arts pedagogy: UK perspectives on teaching for creativity and teaching creatively in the arts , 2015 .

[39]  J. Dewey.  Art as Experience , 1934 .

[40]  Patricia M. Greenfield,et al.  Technology and Informal Education: What Is Taught, What Is Learned , 2009, Science.

[41]  Alla Keselman.  Supporting Inquiry Learning by Promoting Normative Understanding of Multivariable Causality. , 2003 .

[42]  Helena Thuneberg,et al.  To know or not to know: uncertainty is the answer. Synthesis of six different science exhibition contexts , 2018 .

[43]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth Of Logical Thinking From Childhood To Adolescence: An Essay On The Construction Of Formal Operational Structures , 1958 .

[44]  Jarkko Hautamäki,et al.  Scientific Reasoning, School Achievement and Gender: a Multilevel Study of between and within School Effects in Finland , 2015 .

[45]  Bruce Alberts,et al.  Making a Science of Education , 2009, Science.

[46]  Tali Tal,et al.  Out-of-School: Learning Experiences, Teaching and Students’ Learning , 2012 .

[47]  J. Trowsdale,et al.  Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: how can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education? , 2017 .

[48]  F. Bogner,et al.  Science teaching based on cognitive load theory: Engaged students, but cognitive deficiencies , 2012 .

[49]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  What is Scientific Thinking and How Does it Develop , 2007 .

[50]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[51]  Beate Sodian,et al.  Scientific reasoning—Where are we now? , 2008 .

[52]  Hyonyong Lee,et al.  Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a Practical Educational Framework for Korea , 2012 .

[53]  R. Bakeman.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[54]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[55]  D. Klahr,et al.  Developing elementary science skills: Instructional effectiveness and path independence , 2008 .

[56]  J. Reeve,et al.  Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. , 2002 .

[57]  F. Bogner,et al.  Teaching Gene Technology in an Outreach Lab: Students’ Assigned Cognitive Load Clusters and the Clusters’ Relationships to Learner Characteristics, Laboratory Variables, and Cognitive Achievement , 2013 .

[58]  M. Shayer,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF PIAGETIAN STAGES OF THINKING IN BRITISH MIDDLE AND SECONDARY SCHOOL CHILDREN. II—14- to 16-YEAR-OLDS AND SEX DIFFERENTIALS , 1978 .

[59]  Michael Shayer,et al.  Intelligence for education: as described by Piaget and measured by psychometrics. , 2008, The British journal of educational psychology.

[60]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .