Enhancing Educational-Material Retrieval Using Authored-Lesson Metadata

Many authors believe that in order to achieve coherence and flexibility at the same time in multimedia-based learning units, it is highly recommendable to structure the different components as a graph. In a lesson graph, educational resources are encapsulated into learning objects (LO) along with their respective metadata and are interconnected through different kind of rhetorical and semantical relationships. The LOs of these graphs are stored within repositories, where their metadata are used to ease their retrieval. In this paper we propose to integrate the processes of searching LOs and editing the lesson graph. This new framework extends traditional keyword and metadata search to take advantage of the information stored implicitly in the lesson graph structure, making LOs retrieval more effective and the expression of queries more intuitive. The retrieval of the learning material consists of two processes: (1) The user first defines the topological location of a required piece of educational material within the lesson graph, this is, its relationships with other pieces. (2) Then, the user issues a traditional keyword query, which is processed by an IR system modified to take the graph structure into account. Experiments show the advantages of this approach.

[1]  Marco Carvalho,et al.  Enhancing Web Searches from Concept Map-based Knowledge Models , 2001 .

[2]  Tom Murray,et al.  Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An analysis of the state of the art , 1999 .

[3]  Diego Sona,et al.  Automatic Generation of Metadata for Learning Objects , 2006 .

[4]  Mimi Recker,et al.  Perspectives on Teachers as Digital Library Users: Consumers, Contributors, and Designers , 2006, D Lib Mag..

[5]  Olivier Motelet,et al.  Hybrid System for Generating Learning Object Metadata , 2006 .

[6]  Gordon I. McCalla,et al.  The Search for Adaptability, Flexibility, and Individualization: Approaches to Curriculum in Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1992 .

[7]  Thomas C. Schmidt,et al.  Reasoning about eLearning Multimedia Objects ? , 2006 .

[8]  Marco Carvalho,et al.  Googling for a concept map: towards automatic concept-map-based query information , 2004 .

[9]  Yoram Singer,et al.  An Efficient Boosting Algorithm for Combining Preferences by , 2013 .

[10]  Erik Duval,et al.  Finding Appropriate Learning Objects: An Empirical Evaluation , 2005, ECDL.

[11]  Erik Duval,et al.  Frameworks for the Automatic Indexation of Learning Management Systems Content into Learning Object Repositories , 2005 .

[12]  Randall Hagner Trigg,et al.  A network-based approach to text handling for the on-line scientific community , 1983 .

[13]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Social Recommender Systems: Recommendations in Support of E-Learning , 2005, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[14]  Stephan Fischer,et al.  Course and exercise sequencing using metadata in adaptive hypermedia learning systems , 2001, JERC.

[15]  José A. Pino,et al.  Taking advantage of the Semantics of a Lesson Graph based on Learning Objects , 2007, AIED.

[16]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Value-Added Metatagging: Ontology and Rule Based Methods for Smarter Metadata , 2003, RuleML.