Subcellular distribution of glycanases and related components in Ruminococcus albus SY3 and their role in cell adhesion to cellulose

Aims: To compare the subcellular distribution of glycanase‐related components between wild‐type Ruminococcus albus SY3 and an adhesion‐defective mutant, to identify their possible contribution to the adhesion process, and to determine their association with cellulosome‐like complexes.

[1]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  Cellulosomal Scaffoldin-Like Proteins fromRuminococcus flavefaciens , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  E. Bayer,et al.  Adherence of Clostridium thermocellum to cellulose , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  J. Miron,et al.  Characterisation of cellulose-binding proteins that are involved in the adhesion mechanism of Fibrobacter intestinalis DR7 , 1999, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[4]  Morag,et al.  An adhesion‐defective mutant of Ruminococcus albus SY3 is impaired in its capability to degrade cellulose , 1998 .

[5]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[6]  H. Ohara,et al.  Characterization of the Cellulolytic Complex (Cellulosome) from Ruminococcus albus , 2000, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[7]  J. Miron,et al.  Features of Fibrobacter intestinalis DR7 mutant which is impaired with its ability to adhere to cellulose. , 1998, Anaerobe.

[8]  E. Bayer,et al.  Ultrastructure of the cell surface cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum and its interaction with cellulose , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  D. Buxton,et al.  Microbial Adhesion and Degradation of Plant Cell Walls , 1993 .

[10]  D. E. Akin,et al.  Rumen bacteria: interaction with particulate dietary components and response to dietary variation. , 1977, Federation proceedings.

[11]  C. Forsberg,et al.  Regulation and distribution of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes S85 endoglucanases , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  J. Miron,et al.  Adhesion to cellulose by Ruminococcus albus: a combination of cellulosomes and Pil-proteins? , 2000, FEMS microbiology letters.

[13]  Costerton Jw,et al.  Rumen bacteria: interaction with particulate dietary components and response to dietary variation. , 1977 .

[14]  E. Bayer,et al.  Specialized cell surface structures in cellulolytic bacteria , 1987, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  T. Wood,et al.  Preparation of the cellulase from the cellulolytic anaerobic rumen bacterium Ruminococcus albus and its release from the bacterial cell wall. , 1982, The Biochemical journal.

[16]  R. B. Hespell,et al.  Characterization of the cell wall of Butyrivibrio species. , 1993, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[17]  B. White,et al.  Cellulase and xylanase genes from ruminal bacteria: domain analysis suggests a non-cellulosome-like model for organization of the cellulase complex. , 1997 .

[18]  R. E. Hungate,et al.  Effect of 3-Phenylpropanoic Acid on Capsule and Cellulases of Ruminococcus albus 8 , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[19]  D. Dinsdale,et al.  Electron microscopy of bacteria involved in the digestion of plant cell walls , 1984 .

[20]  M. Morrison,et al.  Adherence of the Gram-Positive BacteriumRuminococcus albus to Cellulose and Identification of a Novel Form of Cellulose-Binding Protein Which Belongs to the Pil Family of Proteins , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.