Fire spread across pine needle fuel beds: characterization of temperature and velocity distributions within the fire plume

The aim of this article is twofold. First, it concerns the improvement of knowledge on the fundamental physical mechanisms that control the propagation of forest fires. To proceed, an experimental apparatus was designed to study, in laboratory conditions, the flame of a fire spreading across a pine needle fuel bed. Characterization of temperature was managed by using a reconstruction method based on a double thermocouple probe technique developed recently. The vertical gas velocity distribution was derived from the previous reconstructed signals by measuring the transit time of a thermal fluctuation between two points of the flow. Second, the experimental data were used for the testing of a physical two-phase model of forest fire behavior in which the decomposition of solid fuel constituting a forest fuel bed as well as the multiple interactions with the gas phase are represented.

[1]  R. Chitty,et al.  Some Source-Dependent effects of unbounded fires , 1985 .

[2]  B. Porterie,et al.  On the Prediction of Firebreak Efficiency , 2001 .

[3]  Dominique Morvan,et al.  Firespread through fuel beds: Modeling of wind-aided fires and induced hydrodynamics , 2000 .

[4]  A. Grishin.  Mathematical Modelling of Forest Fires , 1996 .

[5]  D. E. Rosner,et al.  Soot volume fraction and temperature measurements in laminar nonpremixed flames using thermocouples , 1997 .

[6]  Numerical investigation of the flow field behind a shock wave propagating into a carbon–oxygen suspension , 1990 .

[7]  O. Séro-Guillaume,et al.  Modelling forest fires. Part II: reduction to two-dimensional models and simulation of propagation , 2002 .

[8]  S. Patankar.  Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[9]  J.-Y. Chen,et al.  A model for soot formation in a laminar diffusion flame , 1990 .

[10]  Masato Tagawa,et al.  Two-thermocouple probe for fluctuating temperature measurement in combustion : Rational estimation of mean and fluctuating time constants , 1997 .

[11]  M. Larini,et al.  A multiphase formulation for fire propagation in heterogeneous combustible media , 1998 .

[12]  R. Weber,et al.  Modelling fire spread through fuel beds , 1991 .

[13]  C. Fletcher.  Computational techniques for fluid dynamics , 1992 .

[14]  J. W. Eastwood,et al.  Springer series in computational physics Editors: H. Cabannes, M. Holt, H.B. Keller, J. Killeen and S.A. Orszag , 1984 .

[15]  T. Maciaszek,et al.  Temperature and Velocity Fluctuation Measurements in a Diffusion Flame with Large Buoyancy Effects , 1986 .

[16]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  Comparison of the algorithms PISO and simpler for solving pressure-velocity linked equations in simulating compartmental fire , 1997 .

[17]  Paul-Antoine Santoni,et al.  Measurement of fluctuating temperatures in a continuous flame spreading across a fuel bed using a double thermocouple probe , 2002 .

[18]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection , 1991 .

[19]  G. Cox,et al.  Gas velocity measurement in fires by the cross-correlation of random thermal fluctuations—A comparison with conventional techniques , 1975 .

[20]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  Beyond first‐order upwinding: The ultra‐sharp alternative for non‐oscillatory steady‐state simulation of convection , 1990 .

[21]  O. Séro-Guillaume,et al.  Modelling forest fires. Part I: a complete set of equations derived by extended irreversible thermodynamics , 2002 .

[22]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  Why You Should Not Use 'Hybrid', 'Power-Law' or Related Exponential Schemes for Convective Modelling—There Are Much Better Alternatives , 1995 .

[23]  S. Orszag,et al.  Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory , 1986, Physical review letters.