Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate invitation to community-based low-dose CT screening for lung cancer versus usual care in a targeted population at risk
暂无分享,去创建一个
R. Booton | M. Sculpher | D. Torgerson | S. Hinde | R. Murray | K. Franks | M. Callister | D. Baldwin | S. Janes | P. Crosbie | H. Møller | R. Gabe | P. Tharmanathan | R. Neal | U. Macleod | A. Cochrane | S. Quaife | M. Darby | M. Kennedy | S. Rogerson | Irene Simmonds | Nazia Ahmed | M. Messenger | Mike Messenger
[1] S. Parrott,et al. Yorkshire Enhanced Stop Smoking (YESS) study: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of adding a personalised smoking cessation intervention to a lung cancer screening programme , 2020, BMJ Open.
[2] Harry J de Koning,et al. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.
[3] A. Bhowmik,et al. Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT): Randomised Controlled Trial Testing Targeted Invitation Materials. , 2019, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.
[4] Summer S. Han,et al. A Comparative Modeling Analysis of Risk-Based Lung Cancer Screening Strategies , 2019, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[5] R. Booton,et al. Attendees of Manchester’s Lung Health Check pilot express a preference for community-based lung cancer screening , 2019, Thorax.
[6] K. Rodger,et al. The proportion of lung cancer patients attending UK lung cancer clinics who would have been eligible for low-dose CT screening , 2019, European Respiratory Journal.
[7] G. Corrao,et al. Prolonged lung cancer screening reduced 10-year mortality in the MILD trial: new confirmation of lung cancer screening efficacy , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[8] R. Booton,et al. The cost-effectiveness of the Manchester 'lung health checks', a community-based lung cancer low-dose CT screening pilot. , 2018, Lung cancer.
[9] R. Booton,et al. Second round results from the Manchester ‘Lung Health Check’ community-based targeted lung cancer screening pilot , 2018, Thorax.
[10] C. Hyde,et al. Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2018, Health technology assessment.
[11] J. Kleijnen,et al. Risk scores to guide referral decisions for people with suspected ovarian cancer in secondary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2018, Health technology assessment.
[12] M. Rutter,et al. Metformin in non-diabetic hyperglycaemia: the GLINT feasibility RCT. , 2018, Health technology assessment.
[13] R. Booton,et al. Implementing lung cancer screening: baseline results from a community-based ‘Lung Health Check’ pilot in deprived areas of Manchester , 2018, Thorax.
[14] S. Duffy,et al. Impact of low-dose CT screening on smoking cessation among high-risk participants in the UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial , 2017, Thorax.
[15] David Moher,et al. CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. , 2017, Annals of internal medicine.
[16] J. Wardle,et al. Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in socioeconomically deprived and heavy smoking communities: informing screening communication , 2016, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.
[17] J. Wardle,et al. The Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT): protocol for a randomised controlled demonstration lung cancer screening pilot testing a targeted invitation strategy for high risk and ‘hard-to-reach’ patients , 2016, BMC Cancer.
[18] S. Duffy,et al. CT screening for lung cancer: Is the evidence strong enough? , 2016, Lung cancer.
[19] N J Wald,et al. UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening , 2015, Thorax.
[20] M. Callister,et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. , 2015 .
[21] S. Duffy,et al. Barriers to uptake among high-risk individuals declining participation in lung cancer screening: a mixed methods analysis of the UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial , 2015, BMJ Open.
[22] M. Prokop,et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules: accredited by NICE , 2015, Thorax.
[23] Timothy R. Church,et al. Evaluation of the Lung Cancer Risks at Which to Screen Ever- and Never-Smokers: Screening Rules Applied to the PLCO and NLST Cohorts , 2014, PLoS medicine.
[24] William Hazelton,et al. Benefits and Harms of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Strategies: A Comparative Modeling Study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[25] V. Moyer. Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[26] A. Dirksen,et al. Smoking habits in the randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial with low-dose CT: final results after a 5-year screening programme , 2014, Thorax.
[27] Rongwei Fu,et al. Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review to Update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[28] S. Lam,et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.
[29] C. Berg,et al. Targeting of low-dose CT screening according to the risk of lung-cancer death. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.
[30] H. D. de Koning,et al. Characteristics of lung cancers detected by computer tomography screening in the randomized NELSON trial. , 2013, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.
[31] Timothy R Church,et al. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.
[32] C. Berg,et al. Applying the National Lung Screening Trial eligibility criteria to the US population: what percent of the population and of incident lung cancers would be covered? , 2012, Journal of medical screening.
[33] Randy W. Elder,et al. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.
[34] Emma Bradley,et al. The distribution of lung cancer across sectors of society in the United Kingdom: a study using national primary care data , 2011, BMC public health.
[35] D. Mant,et al. Primary care endorsement letter and a patient leaflet to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening: results of a factorial randomised trial , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.
[36] C. Gatsonis,et al. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening , 2012 .
[37] C. von Wagner,et al. Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England. , 2011, International journal of epidemiology.
[38] R. Steele,et al. Pre-notification Increases Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in All Demographic Groups: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2011, Journal of medical screening.
[39] R. V. van Klaveren,et al. Lung cancer screening and smoking abstinence: 2 year follow-up data from the Dutch–Belgian randomised controlled lung cancer screening trial , 2010, Thorax.
[40] Shari Bolen,et al. Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: A systematic review , 2008, Cancer.
[41] S R Cole,et al. An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening , 2007, Journal of medical screening.
[42] C. Gross,et al. The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer , 2005, Cancer.
[43] S. Cole,et al. Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner , 2002, Journal of medical screening.
[44] Roshan Bastani,et al. A randomized clinical trial to assess the benefit of offering on-site mobile mammography in addition to health education for older women. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[45] M. Christian,et al. How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[46] C. Forbes,et al. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. , 2021, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[47] J. Wardle,et al. Predictors of attendance in the United Kingdom flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial , 2000, Journal of medical screening.
[48] N Segnan,et al. Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination in randomized clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.
[49] J. Ware,et al. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.
[50] A. Williams. EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .
[51] A. Kasuya. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.
[52] M. Zelen. A new design for randomized clinical trials. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.