Ethidium monoazide for DNA-based differentiation of viable and dead bacteria by 5'-nuclease PCR.

PCR techniques have significantly improved the detection and identification of bacterial pathogens. Even so, the lack of differentiation between DNA from viable and dead cells is one of the major challenges for diagnostic DNA-based methods. Certain nucleic acid-binding dyes can selectively enter dead bacteria and subsequently be covalently linked to DNA. Ethidium monoazide (EMA) is a DNA intercalating dye that enters bacteria with damaged membranes. This dye can be covalently linked to DNA by photoactivation. Our goal was to utilize the irreversible binding of photoactivated EMA to DNA to inhibit the PCR of DNA from dead bacteria. Quantitative 5'-nuclease PCR assays were used to measure the effect of EMA. The conclusion from the experiments was that EMA covalently bound to DNA inhibited the 5'-nuclease PCR. The maximum inhibition of PCR on pure DNA cross-linked with EMA gave a signal reduction of approximately -4.5 log units relative to untreated DNA. The viable/dead differentiation with the EMA method was evaluated through comparison with BacLight staining (microscopic examination) and plate counts. The EMA and BacLight methods gave corresponding results for all bacteria and conditions tested. Furthermore, we obtained a high correlation between plate counts and the EMA results for bacteria killed with ethanol, benzalkonium chloride (disinfectant), or exposure to 70 degrees C. However, for bacteria exposed to 100 degrees C, the number of viable cells recovered by plating was lower than the detection limit with the EMA method. In conclusion, the EMA method is promising for DNA-based differentiation between viable and dead bacteria.

[1]  S. Drømtorp,et al.  Detection of viable and dead Listeria monocytogenes on gouda‐like cheeses by real‐time PCR , 2005, Letters in applied microbiology.

[2]  V. Lund,et al.  Susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni and Yersinia enterocolitica to UV radiation , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  C. Batt,et al.  Detection of Viable Listeria monocytogenes with a 5′ Nuclease PCR Assay , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[4]  M. Waring,et al.  Complex formation between ethidium bromide and nucleic acids. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  K. Holmstrøm,et al.  Inhibition of PCR by components of food samples, microbial diagnostic assays and DNA-extraction solutions. , 1992, International journal of food microbiology.

[6]  D. Graves,et al.  Ethidium bromide and its photoreactive analogues: spectroscopic analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid binding properties. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[7]  H. Steen,et al.  Uptake kinetics of nucleic acid targeting dyes in S. aureus, E. faecalis and B. cereus: a flow cytometric study. , 1999, Journal of microbiological methods.

[8]  W. E. White,et al.  Selective covalent binding of an ethidium analog to mitochondrial DNA with production of petite mutants in yeast by photoaffinity labelling. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  B. Mackey,et al.  Effect of stress treatments on the detection of Listeria monocytogenes and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by the polymerase chain reaction. , 1994, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[10]  K. L. Yielding,et al.  Ethidium bromide enhancement of frameshift mutagenesis caused by photoactivatable ethidium analogs. , 1979, Mutation research.

[11]  D. Klein,et al.  Proviral load determination of different feline immunodeficiency virus isolates using real‐time polymerase chain reaction: Influence of mismatches on quantification , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[12]  Yielding Kl,et al.  Efficiency of photolytic binding of ethidium monoazide to nucleic acids and synthetic polynucleotides. , 1979 .

[13]  Lee-Ann Jaykus,et al.  rRNA Stability in Heat-Killed and UV-Irradiated EnterotoxigenicStaphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coliO157:H7 , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  W. Bolton,et al.  Comparison of cell viability probes compatible with fixation and permeabilization for combined surface and intracellular staining in flow cytometry. , 1995, Cytometry.

[15]  M. Caprais,et al.  Salmonella DNA persistence in natural seawaters using PCR analysis , 1997, Journal of applied microbiology.

[16]  D. Kell,et al.  Viability and activity in readily culturable bacteria: a review and discussion of the practical issues , 1998, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[17]  J. Gaubatz,et al.  Demonstration of specific high affinity binding sites in plasmid DNA by photoaffinity labeling with an ethidium analog. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  Stephens,et al.  Assessment of bacterial viability status by flow cytometry and single cell sorting , 1998, Journal of applied microbiology.

[19]  A. Holck,et al.  Application of 5′-Nuclease PCR for Quantitative Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Pure Cultures, Water, Skim Milk, and Unpasteurized Whole Milk , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  A. Holck,et al.  Application of the 5′-Nuclease PCR Assay in Evaluation and Development of Methods for Quantitative Detection ofCampylobacter jejuni , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  M. Midgley.  The phosphonium ion efflux system of Escherichia coli: relationship to the ethidium efflux system and energetic studies. , 1986, Journal of general microbiology.

[22]  D. Mulvihill,et al.  Direct In Situ Viability Assessment of Bacteria in Probiotic Dairy Products Using Viability Staining in Conjunction with Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  K L Josephson,et al.  Polymerase chain reaction detection of nonviable bacterial pathogens , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[24]  K. Livak,et al.  Real time quantitative PCR. , 1996, Genome research.

[25]  H. K. Nogva,et al.  Detection and quantification of Salmonella in pure cultures using 5'-nuclease polymerase chain reaction. , 1999, International journal of food microbiology.

[26]  C. Stewart,et al.  Use of a photolabeling technique to identify nonviable cells in fixed homologous or heterologous cell populations. , 1991, Cytometry.

[27]  M. Drake,et al.  Nucleic acid persistence in heat-killed Escherichia coli O157:H7 from contaminated skim milk. , 1999, Journal of food protection.

[28]  J. Novak,et al.  Detection of heat injury in Listeria monocytogenes Scott A. , 2001, Journal of food protection.

[29]  D. Deere,et al.  Go with the flow – use of flow cytometry in environmental microbiology , 1997 .

[30]  T. Abee,et al.  Assessment of viability of microorganisms employing fluorescence techniques. , 2000, International journal of food microbiology.

[31]  K. L. Yielding,et al.  Binding of ethidium monoazide to the chromatin in human lymphocytes. , 1980, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[32]  H. Cheung,et al.  Comparative studies of the binding of ethidium bromide and its photoreactive analogues to nucleic acids by fluorescence and rapid kinetics. , 1980, Biochemistry.

[33]  B. Mackey,et al.  Detection of mRNA by Reverse Transcription-PCR as an Indicator of Viability in Escherichia coliCells , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  N. Pace.  A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. , 1997, Science.

[35]  J. C. Hoff,et al.  Inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni by chlorine and monochloramine , 1986, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[36]  P. Lebaron,et al.  Comparison of Blue Nucleic Acid Dyes for Flow Cytometric Enumeration of Bacteria in Aquatic Systems , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.